It was a symbol of society's struggle
with arbitrary authority and the evolution from one stage in society to another.
Not exact matches
Scalia, attorney for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the lead plaintiff, opened
with a smooth presentation outlining familiar arguments: the DOL lacks the
authority to regulate advisors, acted in an «
arbitrary and capricious» manner, and violated plaintiffs» First Amendment rights.
Finally, every effort must be made to insure that persons entrusted
with the office of teacher will be selected
with regard to their dedication to the
authority of truth and right and not of
arbitrary command.
Can we say
with any
authority, for example, whether the parliamentary democracy of the UK, at some
arbitrary point before european...
The judge not only ordered the state to make sure «school needs» drive school funding, but also to: intervene
with «unconditional
authority» in troubled districts, restore the meaning of high school graduation, end
arbitrary spending on special education and stop churning out «uselessly perfect teacher evaluations.»
He has a few minor eccentricities: his command of invective, which has earned him the Egyptian sobriquet of Father of Curses, his explosive temper, his autocratic,
arbitrary method of dealing
with the
authorities of the Service des Antiquités, which had led in the past to our being barred from most of the interesting sites in Egypt... Well, but no proud mother could have asked for a better son than mine.
The toolset of denialist restriction - by -
authority is always the same: rudeness, abuse, anger amounting to rage, personal profiling, selective enforcement of
arbitrary rules, legal threats, enemy lists, and outright censorship of threatening ideas — always
with a view toward sustaining a «protected bubble» for denialist beliefs.
As explained by the ECJ in its previous case - law (Case C ‑ 419 / 14, WebMindLicenses), the requirement that any limitation on the exercise of that right must be provided for by law implies that the legal basis which permits any interference
with personal rights and liberties must be sufficiently clear and precise, affording legal protection against any
arbitrary interferences by public
authorities.
As a result, a regime of general data retention should be established on the basis of measures adopted by a legislative
authority, that are accessible and foreseeable while offering adequate protection against
arbitrary interference
with the rights of privacy and data protection (§ 153).
But apart from the (rather fundamental) rule of law point — that obligations need to have some legal
authority for them to be binding — if they do want to impose such an obligation, it should be expressly set out in the Rules,
with a corresponding commentary, so that lawyers know exactly what actions they have to take, or not take, to comply
with their obligation (and, crucially, aren't at the whim of
arbitrary diktats from the LSUC).
I hope that more people
with the
authority to make hiring decisions will see the wisdom in hiring the most qualified candidate and stop a practice that potentially screens out good applicants because of something as
arbitrary as employment status.