Sentences with phrase «with argument from»

In the result, if you are faced with an argument from ICBC that you do not have any entitlement to ICBC money because of the worker vs. worker argument then it's best to get a lawyer

And from Wired GC's perspective, Cisco is winning the war on the blogging front with this argument from Chandler:

The post also interacts with other posts, quoting and agreeing with an argument from the well - known Likelihood of Confusion blog.

I took issue before with an argument from a «conscious carnivore» that going vegetarian would not stop factory farming.

One might argue that Monckton is simply using his opponent's argument against him, and that Monckton has no truck with the argument from authority, except that to top off his smackdown Monckton appeals to his own authority: the unnamed statistician.

First she opens up with an argument from authority (even using the term).

I have written many times about how Lewandowsky uses Argument from Authority ad nauseum along with ad hominems, and lightly seasoned with Argument from Ignorance.

Overton took issue with the argument from some lawmakers in the General Assembly who say that districts simply need to do a better job managing the funds they have been allocated by the state.

Most disappointingly, you might be faced with this argument from other mothers who feel as if you breastfeeding your child might somehow damage their children who see it.

You haven't responded to what I have talked about with argument from authority, so I'm not going to consider your recommendations.

EDIT: I would generalize this case with arguments from the preceding paragraphs.

«I would bring in some of these observational aspects; he would come back with arguments from theory, and we would push each other.

Anyone working in the pension reform movement is soon confronted with arguments from defenders of the current pension system that are — to put it nicely — inconsistent with standard financial economics.

The Guardian explained how «Tor rips up the rulebook on digital rights management» and the BBC featured a long article with arguments from both sides, drawing links with the music industry's experience of the transition and highlighting that «the key difference with the music business is that the book trade can see what mistakes the record labels made and avoid them.»

Pekka responds with arguments from authority (i.e. «the scientific community has agreed...») or cites physical theory, but has not cited any empirical evidence so far.

Not exact matches

Basically, the argument was, if you're going to spend decades with a person you're going to miscommunicate, you're going to misunderstand each other, you're going to have situations where you don't get where the other person is coming from or you make the wrong assumptions.

The Trump Administration counters that critique by saying that these cuts will be deficit neutral, with individuals enjoying economic growth stemming from these cuts and reinvesting that windfall into the economy, an argument that Mnuchin delivered at a Wednesday press briefing announcing the plan.

Before this starts to sound like the annual lecture from management — perhaps you're one of those corporate employees forced to sleepwalk through an intranet quiz once in a while to prove to your higher - ups that you're familiar with the company's code of conduct — consider DeMars's argument for the value of the ethical office from a personal standpoint: «In order to live happily and at peace with ourselves, we have to live in ways that are congruent with our morals,» she argues.

There are a lot of hypotheticals in that, per usual with this line of argument, but it's not that far from being a reality.

There's a depth of reporting here that suggests he took this assignment personally, and he makes a compelling argument that the interests of a publicly traded corporation and a Wall Street culture hell - bent on wringing every last efficiency from a business aren't compatible with the stock in trade of the journalism industry — reporting that earns and safeguards the public trust.

Bargaining for Advantage, the book by Wharton professor G. Richard Shell, often backs its arguments with tidbits drawn from psychological research.

In conjunction with watching Star Trek, we will read excerpts from the writings of great philosophers, extract key concepts and arguments and then analyze those arguments.»

The city argues in a news release that the company should be required to comply with all municipal bylaws, despite its argument they were unconstitutional because they conflicted with approval from the federal government and the National Energy Board Act.

Brian and Brittany Schear were on a red - eye flight April 23 from Maui to Los Angeles when they got into an argument with airline officials, who said the seat in question needed to be given to another passenger.

He based his lawsuit on the argument that the Russia investigation had charged him and Gates with crimes unrelated to the original intent of the investigation, but instead had pursued «any matters that arose or may arise directly from» it.

The same issue has come up recently with demands from mega-givers not to have to disclose their giving on the argument that they're likely to be criticized or «vilified» or «intimidated.»

«To place defendants» argument in a real world context,» she wrote, «they assert that for the payment of approximately $ 100 a year to the Copyright Office (the payment for a Section 111 compulsory license) and without compliance with the strictures of the Communications Act or plaintiffs» consent, that they are entitled to use and profit from the plaintiffs» copyrighted works.»

Third, the argument that mini flash crashes played a contributory role could benefit in the future from supplementary analysis, such as parallel analysis of liquidity levels that was time - aligned with the increase in mini flash crashes.

The argument from people in support of increasing the transaction capacity by this amount was that there are always inherent centralisation pressure with bitcoin mining.

The week begins with court arguments on whether companies can prevent workers from joining together to sue them.

Neal and Taylor's argument was rooted in math: there were more consumers than there were IT users, which meant that over the long run the rate of improvement in consumer technologies would exceed that of enterprise - focused ones; IT departments needed to grapple with increased demand from their users to use the same technology they used at home.

Here is a post from Libertarian News that begins, «I recently got into an argument over on the Reddit Bitcoin boards where I held the position that fractional reserve banking with Bitcoins was not possible,» which sounds fun; he recants that view but does make what I think is a very valid point:

I did read the article, yes — and I am familiar with the arguments around Bitcoin from a number of different perspectives.

Other issues with the page stem from reliable sources, arguments on how the fork was initiated, and debates regarding the Segregated Witness protocol.

@ermine — I don't want to have the «returns from cash» argument with you again.

The other argument for a fund with concentrated holdings comes from Phil Fisher, one of Warren Buffett's favourite investors.

Other issues with the page stem from reliable sources, arguments on how the fork was initiated, and debates regarding the

While this sounds like monetary madness, it should be remembered that Ben Bernanke, former Chair of the US Federal Reserve, urged such action on the Japanese government a decade ago to deal with that country's deflationary crisis, and referenced Milton Friedman's argument that a central bank financed stimulus via a «helicopter drop» of money could have saved the United States from the Great Depression.

Since the argument is that this is the scientific way to do things, let me start with an example from serious science: pharmaceuticals.

A plausible argument can be made that the Fed should now deviate from its rule book, but the argument isn't that the economy is too weak to cope with tighter monetary policy.

One argument with superficial attractiveness is that the old regimes failed these countries, and therefore something else — preferably very different from the old regime — will solve the problem.

The usual arguments from the far right («we can not afford this,» they say, or «if you pay people for not working, people won't work») join with those on the far left («this is just a way to reduce pressures on the minimum wage or cut back all the other programmes that are vital») are mutually reinforcing, even though they're largely inaccurate.

Crabtree «appeared sympathetic to Market Synergy's arguments that independent marketing organizations (IMOs) and independent agents will suffer irreparable harm» unless DOL «is enjoined from enforcing Revised PTE 84 - 24 with respect to fixed indexed annuities,» said Sweeney, a former DOL attorney.

Much of your argument such as I've seen, for your sky fairy (and I really think that is an appropriate term for your obviously fictional deity with all the self - contradictory tales about it in the bible), really seems to consist of a combination of willed ignorance and arguments from ignorance.

The truth project was blatantly intelligent design and loaded with quote mines, arguments from ignorance, god of the gaps, strawmen, etc...

your claim of «they change the definition» tries to under - cut the argument itself «at the knees» so to speak... but let me remind you that you changed your self - definition from drunk and unsaved to «drunk with the new wine» and saved (get the Acts reference, i'm kinda proud of that one; — RRB --RRB- things change and when we know better we do better.

The last childlike argument from someone with no valid position or evidencial support.

A populist who inspires so little enthusiasm from actual voters that he drops out before the first ballot gets cast probably isn't the man to improve Mitt Romney's numbers with blue - collar voters in Ohio and Michigan — and absent that qualification, the argument for picking Pawlenty mostly evaporates.

I find it funny that the Christian position, when met with any logical argument to discount the greatness of the Bible, can only cite more passages from the same book, as opposed to countering with a equally logical counter position.

But from what I can gather, the Brits probably mopped the floor with the Americans — the former's bad arguments being less bad than the latter's.