Sentences with phrase «with arguments presented»

The Court agreed with the arguments presented by Mr. Kump and his team, ruling in favor of their clients and summarily denying Petitioners» request for an emergency stay and reversal of the trial court's orders in an international child custody case.

The Tribunal disagreed with both arguments presented by MBM.

The Tax Court of Canada agreed with the CRA's position, but the Federal Court of Appeal, in a unanimous 3 - 0 decision, agreed with the arguments presented by TDS counsel, Jeff Pniowsky.

The links provided do not necessarily reflect my personal opinion and should be seen as general interest: oftentimes I do not agree with arguments presented, but nevertheless think it is worthwhile to read them.

Only time will tell whether there is now an emerging Democratic majority but with the arguments presented by Teixeira and Judis, it's hard to argue against this current political trend.

The problem with the argument you present here is you have presented ideas as being mutually exclusive that are not, in fact, mutually exclusive.

Not exact matches

It presented two findings: First, the German public didn't like the reforms passed by Merkel's government in its first year; second, when the public was presented with arguments and data justifying the reforms, it liked them even less.

In a recent interview with Cory Johnson on Bloomberg TV, Cuban presented an interesting argument against people pursuing so - hot - right - now computer science degrees or attending learn - to - code bootcamps.

They then conducted a series of experiments that measured how open to being wrong the volunteers were and how it affected their estimation of people with opposing views, as well as how accurately they'd understood the arguments they'd been presented with.

However, there had been prior incidents during which the two employees had engaged in full - blown arguments with customers present.

I think mutual funds with load are in its way to extinction, but there are many of them still out there and there are many astute commission - based advisors who will present persuasive arguments for you to buy them.

The argument you have just presented is known as Pascal's Wager and it is a thoroughly laughable argument to anyone with a brain.

Religion encourages the need to cloak one's self in a security blanket which only belittles any argument presented by the religion — and they do it with a 2000 year old book.

Still not sure I agree with this totally, but it presents an interesting argument against Calvinistic election.

In presenting an argument, I just wish that those who try to tear down the integrity of the Old Testament prophets would at least be honest, transparent, with the other point of view.

If you want to have a serious debate, you'll have to start engaging with the facts and arguments that have been presented rather than merely ignoring them and restating the same old arguments that you seem so desperate to believe.

You have yet to directly respond to the specific points I've made at least three times now, i.e.: 1) the immutable good nature argument is simply unsupported definitional fiat (god can be equally described as malevolent or apathetic with equal support); 2) the immutable good nature argument presents a source of morality beyond god's direct control placing the argument in the god says so because it is good prong of the dilemma; and 3) the argument suggests god is not omnipotent because god is constrained to only a limited set of potential behaviors.

Surely the students must be presented with both sides of the argument?

Having once been an agnostic, I know most of the arguments unbelievers use, I use most of them myself... I also know for a fact that you can not argue someone into a belief in God, they have to get their on their own, with the evidence presented for Him...

I am sympathetic to the common - sense argument that the book presents — especially as it is remarkably well documented and proceeds with a lawyer's precision.

We can connect Whitrow's argument with Craig's intuitions about counting to infinity, but this time, we will run the sequence from the past to the present (indeed, the past is symmetrical).

Shalom's argument against the former relies on Grice's notion of «present total temporary states,» Shalom totally includes memory as an element in a «present total temporary state» and within this context charges that «what is called «memory» necessarily ceases to possess the property of «pastness» which is associated with memory» and required by Hartshorne's theory.

They trade upon the current power and meaning of these words, and thus their arguments present themselves with enormous force.

There never was a time in History that atheists exist, only in this present stage of our intellectual developement that they deny His exisrence, but it can be easily explained that they are just part of the dialectical process of having to have two opposing arguments or forces to arrive to the truth, The opposing forces today are the theists or religious believers of all religions and the other are the atheists who denies religion, The reslultant truth in the future will be Panthrotheism, the belief that we are all one with the whole universe with God, and that we Had all to unite to prepare for human survival that will subject us humans in the future.Aided by the the enlightend consevationist, environmentalists, humanists and all of the concerned activists, we will develop a kind of universal harmony and awareness that we are all guided towards love and concern for all of our specie.The great concern of the whole conscious and caring world to the natural disaster in the Phillipines,, the most theist country now is a positive sign towards this religious direction.Panthrotheism means we will be One with God.

If I'm presented with an argument that is valid and makes sense then I will change my mind.

Indeed, to the best of my knowledge Hartshorne does not explicitly link his position on creation with his position on relativity, contingency, and potentiality, as he does link the latter with his position on temporality.13 On the other hand, he does present other arguments against the traditional position, none of which seem tome to have any substance.

Despite my own dissatisfaction with these arguments, it is only right that I should present them as sympathetically as possible.

My kids chose atheism over religion when presented with arguments for both.

Part of the answer is that these ancient events are moments in a living process which includes also the existence of the church at the present day; and another part is that, as Christians believe, in these events of ancient time God was at work among men, and it is from his action in history rather than from abstract arguments that we learn what God is like, and what are the principles on which he deals with men, now as always.

That does not work in this argument... Jesus was making a point with the rich young man... the rich young man was trying to justify himself... and when Jesus presented him this..

Plato, then» this is the heart of Nussbaum's argument» presents us with a «harsh and alarming» picture of love: «We see two kinds of value, two kinds of knowledge; and we see that we must choose.

In addition to the argument from the wonders and the apparent intelligence of the world, and from the course of human history, past and future, as he believed it might he calculated, Second Isaiah had one other consideration which is presented with such brevity that there is danger of reading into it perhaps more than he meant.

See, Johnny, that's exactly my point; I present people like you with well - developed arguments and, when you have run out logical avenues by which to respond, you turn immediately to the mantras of your faith — «jesus rose from the dead».

Meanwhile let me say that I hope that the present volume may be followed by another, if I am spared to write it, in which not only Professor Royce's arguments, but others for monistic absolutism shall be considered with all the technical fullness which their great importance calls for.

Kasemann's argument that this form of pronouncement comes from early Christian prophecy is careful and convincing, with the result that we must accept the fact that in their present form the two gospel sayings come from an early Christian tradition and not from the teaching of Jesus.

He has stated elsewhere, for example, that the fact that evil presents no serious logical or probabilistic argument against God's existence or goodness will be cold and abstract comfort to a person who is faced with «the shocking concreteness of a particularly appalling exemplification of evil» (AP 35 - 36).

I thought, however, that the entire argument presented by Aquinas on the existence of God began with a premise I can not accept.

This argument is not new, but I have not seen it presented with such power and intensity.

In keeping with Thomas Lynch, who made a similar argument a few weeks ago in the pages of this magazine, Sarat wants to televise state killing, arguing that «the public is always present at an execution» — the only question that remains is whether we are willing to see what is being done in our name.

It is quite clear that a book subjected to attacks like this from a man like Luther begins with a handicap, although Calvin was perfectly right when he said that he saw nothing in James to criticize, because it was quite unreasonable to expect every man to present the argument for Christianity and Christ in exactly the same way

Our objection would be that the Catholic side of the argument in section 3, on marriage and family life, is woefully inadequate, and that the non-Catholic side is presented with unacknowledged quasi-relativist assumptions which are profoundly opposed to Catholic thinking and formation.

He even acknowledges with regard to the purpose present in the universe that «some of the arguments for it in the past have come to seem naive in the light of the insights of Darwinian biology».

You may disagree, but in order to be credible you're going to have to deal with the careful and methodical arguments presented.

On the other hand, I could make a number of reasonable arguments to demonstrate that belief in your god is unjustified (such as the argument that I've just presented you with).

It was an appropriate conclusion to a genial evening in which the Catholic side, while largely failing to engage directly with opposing arguments, presented its vision much more coherently than in the Intelligence Squared debate of last November.

In The Myth of Monogamy, Barash and Lipton present a compelling (and cross-disciplinary) argument that heteros.exual couples have never been paragons of fidelity to begin with.

Arsenal are blessed with with a large squad of performing stars at present, and with Olivier Giroud fit and ready to return, there could be argument for a switch in tactics.

I'm not presenting this argument as way to keep you on board with Hinkie or «The Process» or anything like that.

As much as news might not have hit the airwaves due to the precision with which the transfers were executed, just imagine how many top clubs would want to have the two (and please don't give me the «present form» argument, most managers are smarter than that) from two seasons ago.

Great banter with all opinions accommodated as the tone was respectful and generally based on facts and well presented arguments and opinions.