Not exact matches
In a Harvard Business Review article titled «Men Shouldn't Refuse to
be Alone
with Female Colleagues,» United States Naval Academy professors W. Brad Johnson and David G. Smith
make a similar
argument.
Basically, the
argument was, if you
're going to spend decades
with a person you
're going to miscommunicate, you
're going to misunderstand each other, you
're going to have situations where you don't get where the other person
is coming from or you
make the wrong assumptions.
The suits
are part of a group of at least four other cases
with similar
arguments in various courts around the country, and they
make legal experts wary, particularly as the differences in opinion seem to indicate their destiny to go before the Supreme Court.
However, on the other hand, the
argument could
be made that parodies in the adult context would qualify for a fair use defense, as
with other parodies.
Klepper said he noticed while covering Trump rallies that the information, language, and
arguments that people
were making had less in common
with Fox News and more in common
with Breitbart News and even the conspiracy - peddling Infowars.
There
's a depth of reporting here that suggests he took this assignment personally, and he
makes a compelling
argument that the interests of a publicly traded corporation and a Wall Street culture hell - bent on wringing every last efficiency from a business aren't compatible
with the stock in trade of the journalism industry — reporting that earns and safeguards the public trust.
You could describe this as social media
with training wheels, and
make the
argument that it
's helpful for kids to learn to use social media under the eye of an adult.
Shah
's argument about «an inferior competitive landscape»
makes no sense, however, although it
's of a piece
with other Tesla mega-bulls, such as Loup Ventures» Gene Munster, who seems to think that Tesla can basically sell 11 million cars in the US alone.
With criticism of self - driving cars swirling, our hunch
is that it
's a staged video
made in the hopes of driving the
argument that autonomous vehicles
are safe to get behind the wheel of, even when you
're asleep.
(See The Curse of Microsoft Excel) I remember long
arguments with clients in one of my first businesses, where we tracked customer satisfaction by
making millions of phone calls each year to consumers at home to determine how satisfied they had
been with a recent experience.
His whole
argument that he wouldn't
be able to negotiate a good deal
with Play - Doh unless he had a controlling stake in Soy - Yer - Dough
made no sense, as Herjevac pointed out.
This
is because, even if you have a heated
argument, as long as you keep in the back of your mind that the people you
're arguing
with do have the best in mind for the company and wider team, you'll always
be able to
make it to the end and remain friendly.
argument is usually
made with complete lack of acknowledgement for the trade - off
being consciously
made for investment in growth.
Stagnating incomes and soaring housing prices have led to an affordability crisis, and the government could
make the
argument that this should
be addressed
with a policy intervention.
While I truly want to
be with you on the hands - off - free - market
argument, I just have to believe that these rules
are in place for good reasons... like
making sure your sweet Granny don't get fleeced by a huckster.
I heard this line of
argument in 2011, 2012, 2013 — and it
's still
being made,
with investing sages telling people to sell stock and hold more cash.
That
's an
argument Sun CEO Scott McNealy
makes frequently when defending his company
's general reluctance to enter the services business but instead rely on partnerships
with consulting firms.
The
arguments of Adair Turner and others seem to me to depend on a notion that you
are making some kind of permanent commitment
with respect to future monetary policy by engaging in money - financed fiscal policy.
Asked which province — B.C., which wants to delay the project for environmental reasons, or Alberta, which wants to avoid delays for economic reasons —
is making the more compelling
argument, Canadians
are evenly split,
with 50 per cent saying each province's government
is more persuasive
Here
is a post from Libertarian News that begins, «I recently got into an
argument over on the Reddit Bitcoin boards where I held the position that fractional reserve banking
with Bitcoins
was not possible,» which sounds fun; he recants that view but does
make what I think
is a very valid point:
An
argument can
be made that there
are no «regulators» that can bring down the price of bitcoin like they could
with silver.
You'd probably have to come up
with a statistical model that estimates what the fluctuations should
be given some basic assumptions on how people will buy to
make a conclusive
argument that there
is something fishy here.
A plausible
argument can
be made that the Fed should now deviate from its rule book, but the
argument isn't that the economy
is too weak to cope
with tighter monetary policy.
Trump's lawyers have
made a number of
arguments to try to get Zervos's suit dismissed, but the most important has to do
with the fact that Zervos
is suing in New York state court.
The problem I've always had
with the stocks vs bond yield
argument is that if rates rise, the whole thing doesn't
make sense.
How convenient, once again, that something that
makes absolutely no sense whatsoever can
be explained away
with an
argument that can't
be refuted.
To
make gains among these voters, Republicans needed to
make detailed (but pithy)
arguments about what
was wrong
with Obamacare and the benefits of Republican health care policy X (read National Affairs to get an idea of some of the things they could have said), and do so in plain language.
If you
're going to
make the stupid
argument that the term «belief» means the same thing whether it
's applied to a god or the sun coming up, then argue
with someone else.
Ms. Morthole
is trying to justify her continued sinning
with very weak
arguments on how sinning
makes her feel good about herself.
So here we have «Chuck» (aka Mark) pretending nothing
was said, no proofs given, no
arguments made, so he can pat himself on the back for «denying» the truth and taking (I suppose) some of the sting of losing away
with him.
Start
with the science that shows the humanity and individuality of the embryo, and then
make philosophical
arguments about the equality of all human
beings as persons possessing inherent dignity.
It
's an
argument I've
been making for years,
with little success: Social observers in general and religious folk in particular vastly overestimate the influence of the news and entertainment media.
Fundamentalist Chrsitians
made a big mistake
with this intelligent design nonsense — it
's the wrong
argument.
like former leader... we too have kept open house and had people live
with us long and short term for nearly all our married life... we've had debate,
argument, sadness, hilarity... even had someone
with a disturbing psychosis... not at one stage have we felt the need to
make any rules... that would almost
be like copping out of relationship.
The problem
with that
argument is that
with this new evidence they
are not
making a claim based on «silence» they
are basing it on actual archaeological data.
It
is no accident that Percy summons Flannery O'Connor to such questions as well; but unlike her, he does not anchor his response in St. Augustine and St. Paul (we have here no abiding place) nor in St. Thomas, whose
argument is insistent that the poet's, the artist's, responsibility
is to the good of the thing
being made, not
with the correction of appetites in his audience.
the burden of proof lies
with the individual who
is making the
argument.
To go along
with this, you have to believe three things, all controversial: (1) that authenticity
is a valid idea; (2) that you can argue in reason about ideals and about the conformity of practices to these ideals; and (3) that these
arguments can
make a difference.
If what you
're trying to use here
is the ad hominem fallacy - attacking an
argument by attacking the person
making the
argument - then the only people you'll convince
with this tactic
are those who haven't learned to think critically.
Of course they may end up disagreeing
with Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth about the moral significance of our
being created male and female, but shouldn't they
be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition
made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even
make our
argument for inclusion»?
Press those who
make that
argument, however, and we discover that they do have definite notions of what
is obscene, beginning
with the people who protest obscenity.
The problem
with this
argument is you
are making the assumption that the Big Bang
was true, despite its own problems.
LA there
is nothing wrong
with making an
argument that Jesus may have implied such a thing or even that Jesus agreed
with everything stated in the OT.
While I agree
with your as.sertion that an
argument for the oversimplification can
be made on nearly any position, I think the previous statement
is not only unreasonably over simplified, if such
were definable, but
is, in fact, flat out incorrect.
there
are scholars
with whom I disagree but I recognize they
are actually appealing to scholarship &
making an INFORMED
argument.
Noreen, 50,
was the first woman to
be sentenced to death under Pakistan's blasphemy laws when she received the punishment in November 2010, after allegedly
making derogatory comments about the Prophet Muhammad during an
argument with a Muslim woman.
As for the claim that if one simply waits long enough
with an open heart, God will reveal Himself — that same
argument is made by just about every religion.
They knew how to
make their case to a jury — by creating a framework for the jury through which they will
be compelled to agree
with the perspective and
argument of the lawyer / theologian.
The only
argument that
makes sense for Christians
is to claim that God, working
with believing players to give them the courage to
be better ones on both sides of every game, ultimately
makes the game a better one, and more entertaining.
But such
arguments make little headway
with socialists, says Novak, because, contrary to appearances, socialism
is not really a practical political proposal at all.