You should send that one into the folks that maintain the logical fallacy bingo game, along
with argumentum ad Latinum gloriosum, arguments based on fancy Latin phrases.
Please do not confuse personal insults
with argumentum ad hominem.
Not exact matches
Bible Scholars claim «
argumentum ad vercundiam»
with the Bible, knowing full well that one passage is consider in errant, then the whole text becomes in question.
Then you'd have to decide whether you want to go
with a plan that seems to have a good reason behind it, but constitutes
argumentum ad ignoratiam, or tell yourself that
argumentum ad ignoratiam is always a logical fallacy, and therefore stubbornly continue crossing against the light.
Ad hominem (Latin for «to the man» or «to the person» [1]-RRB-, short for
argumentum ad hominem, is a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated
with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.