Sentences with phrase «with at least some evidence»

Private schools are often perceived to be more effective, with at least some evidence to buttress that position.
With curiosity, I thought this might be the first Op - Ed to suggest, hopefully with at least some evidence, that VAM - based data can be used in some type of formative way (s).

Not exact matches

But, HBO's The Jinx provided an in - depth look at Durst's odd behavior and quirky personality traits, while also bringing to light crucial new evidence that eventually paved the way for authorities to revive at least one murder case associated with Durst.
Given at least some evidence of softening in the job market in tandem with slower core price growth, a data - driven Fed should pause and take stock of where we are.
The FCC, however, offered no evidence of the attacks, with at least one pro-net neutrality group expressing skepticism of the FCC's claims.
Whilst the sector has traditionally been seen as a stepping stone on the way to long - term leases, the evidence suggests that the sector is now being seen as a long - term option with 39 % of businesses now staying in businesses centres for at least three years, an almost three-fold increase on 2014.
According to U.S. best practices, nonprofit boards should be comprised of at least five people who have little overlap with an organization's staff or other related parties.70 However, there is only weak evidence that following these best practices is correlated with success, and if they are correlated, that may be because more competent organizations are more likely to both follow best practices and to succeed — rather than because following best practices leads to success.
What is most uncomfortable about the present market environment is that even some people whom we respect are tossing out comments about market valuation here that are provably wrong, or at least require one to dispense with the entirety of historical evidence if their optimistic views are to be correct.
What would be shocking however is if this alien race had an incredibly similar story to that found in the bible complete with a single god, a jesus, some miracles, some parables, etc.... It would be the similarity of religions between alien races in this hypothetical that would truely shock me and at least make me question if that would be a solid point of evidence for the religious.
We hurt their feelings and probably interfere with their sleep patterns by calling them out on everything from poor spelling to having a faith grounded in no evidence (at least in its core claims).
«By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles by which Christianity is supported, — that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible, do miracles become, — that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us, — that the Gospels can not be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events, — that they differ in many important details, far too important as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eyewitness; — by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation.
At least with science, we look at empirical evidence, craft a theory that explains the evidence, then continually look to refine the theory as we uncover more evidence to support or refute our theorieAt least with science, we look at empirical evidence, craft a theory that explains the evidence, then continually look to refine the theory as we uncover more evidence to support or refute our theorieat empirical evidence, craft a theory that explains the evidence, then continually look to refine the theory as we uncover more evidence to support or refute our theories.
Not to compare it with your belief, but many people are convinced that they experienced an alien abduction, but that experience is not considered evidence of aliens on earth, at least not by most people.
I applaud what he is doing and hope that he brings others to God throught the torture and bloody human sacrifice of his son (himself, actually) where he died (well, for a few hours anyway) for us all (at least so the story goes) so that we may live with him in heaven (a great place for which no evidence or photographs exist) until the end of time.
That would just be ludicrous), as time goes on, there seems to be more and more evidence coming up that there isn't a god, especially YOUR kind of god at least, as the Bible just seems to be getting destroyed with actual facts.
If you want to disagree with the exegetical evidence, fine, but at least give me reasons why you disagree with my findings.
They may not be valid, but they are at least consistent with the evidence as it's understood.
Scientists who don't agree with evolution or at least admit that there is no concrete evidence to back it up, generally get overshadowed (in layman's terms — shutout) by science organizations that dominate the scientific community.
Citing a biblical scholar, he says: «In the light of the conclusions drawn earlier that there is no explicit Old Testament justification for assuming that wine drinking is ever appropriate for the saint, even in moderation, it is important to indicate briefly that the New Testament evidence concurs with, or at least is not contrary to, this conclusion» (p. 137).
Throw us a bone, cup your mouth, and whisper in our ears what you know we are listening for about the nature of Scripture, and then you can go on your way with broad, philisophical musings that interest some but at least we will have some evidence that you are not dragging the doctrinal wing of the church into the forest of no return.
I shall assume that the aim of an explication of «valid induction» is to find a numerical or comparative function c (h, e)-- the «confirmation of hypothesis h given evidence e» — which is a syntactic function of the statements h and e, and which has a high or comparatively high value in those cases where normally accepted or intuitive inductive methods would direct us to accept hypothesis h on evidence e, at least in comparison with other hypotheses having lower c - value.
With respect to this evidence, I shall now proceed to argue (1) that the experiences Whitehead cites do not prove what they need to prove in order to substantiate his theory, (2) that we do not actually have such experiences anyway, at least not in the form Whitehead describes them, and (3) that such experiences of causes and effects together, when they involve a reference to the subject experiencing them, seem in principle to be impossible.
Eight years of experience with special training programs for men who have been in the ministry at least five years have provided a vast amount of evidence as to the basic problems confronting Christian ministers today.
The beliefs are just so far out there for me, that whenever I see someone in ardent support of them I have to think they're a troll, because I don't know how they could possibly believe or accept that (there are a few exceptions of people who pt things very well, cite supporting evidence, and are consistent and coherent - I don't agree with them, but I can at least understand what they're saying)
But on the whole, there is enough evidence at least to suggest that, if one wants to have both a market economy and democracy, it is better to have the former precede the latter» if you will, to have perestroika before glasnost (it being understood, of course, that Gorbachev had something other than full capitalism in mind with the former term, and something less than full democracy with the latter).
(52) The solution may seem to us not very persuasive, but it is at least evidence of the honest, profound, and imaginative wrestling with the problem of God's presence among banished exiles.
Moreover, such evidence explicitly supports the belief, also traditional, that one self - same scheme of thought animates and finds at least implicit expression in Whitehead's writings beginning with Science and the Modern World.
The available evidence indicates that this relationship of the Indian church with the church in Basra existed at least from the third century.
I tend to avoid lumping Jesus in with the Tooth Fairy, Pink Unicorns and the Flying Spaghetti Monster, as there is at least some evidence the dude actually existed.
We both accept, I think, these four related things about human knowing: (1) sentient experience of «physical things» is intrinsically infused with objective meaning, purposefulness and value; (2) flowing out, of this and intertwined with it is, at least for humans, «cognition» of the physical, and moral experience of such value; (3) this moral experience and engagement reveals the spiritual realm as something foundational to and «abstractly distinguishable» from the physical realm — values for Ward, mind for me; and (4) one piece of evidence for making such a distinction is the uniquely «publicly....
There is a growing acceptance among Christians and Christian leaders of, at the very least, old earth theories that are in line with scientific evidence.
There is significant evidence to suggest that at least some complex features of organisms result from what biologists call exadaptation, a phenomenon in which one genetic mutation confers a certain kind of survival advantage on an organism, and later, after subsequent mutations have occurred, the original mutation combines with the subsequent ones to confer a wholly different advantage.
With Ricky Silberman's assistance he reassembled his brief of facts and allegations, suppressed disconfirming evidence, strong - armed a hostile witness, and blasted Mayer and Abrahamson's book to the point of denying at least one claim that he knew was true: «Up to this point in my career, even when I fell short, I had always believed I was pursuing accurate information.
This is at least arguably consistent with the evidence from the appearance to Paul.
and although there are many problems that admit of no certain solution, e.g. the difficulty of reconciling passages where the kingdom is spoken of as present with those where it is spoken of as future, there is at least sufficient evidence for reconstructing the main lines of Jesus» authentic eschatological teaching.
At least with an executive board there are some checks and measures — whereas Abramovich can basically do what he wants, as evidenced by the Cech saga and his many other run - ins with his managers before.
The evidence shows that these words — at least at times — were spoken to Martin in a cutting tone or with the intent to humiliate him.
I mean this site / thread probably isn't the place (understatement) but I have delved into this argument more thn the averge joe, and I guarantee someone taking the opposing position in a debate against me on this subject is going to have their hands full with the amount of evidence I could put forth on them for the supposition that an intelligent enity at the very least kick started this thing off.
Having watched the TV cop / crime procedural shows jurors want to see scientific evidence — there will be at least one on every jury who will be thinking to him / herself «Ted Danson and Elisabeth Shue would have done a much better job with this case.»
Though the football is far from, well, good (Lambert's a bright coach, yet have I seen any evidence he's a miracle worker) they at least play with a degree of positivity - ie; endeavour to pass the thing - and the young chaps he's drafted in appear committed, fearless and a darn sight easier to love.
Interestingly, just days before the NFL's decision to suspend the use of impact sensors was announced, my local paper, The Boston Globe, came out with a powerful editorial in which it urged college, high school, and recreational leagues in contact and collision sports to consider mandating use of impact sensors, or, at the very least, experimenting with the technology, to alert the sideline personnel to hits that might cause concussion, and to track data on repetitive head impacts, which, a growing body of peer - reviewed evidence suggests, may result, over time, in just as much, if not more, damage to an athlete's brain, as a single concussive blow, and may even predispose an athlete to concussion.
Researchers said clinical evidence shows that up to 35 % of children with food allergies have atopic dermatitis, much of which is explained by at least three different gene mutations that reduce the skin barrier.
Evidence is accumulating that mothers with the fewest personal and social resources, including low income, benefit more from the service, at least in the areas assessed, than do those with more resources.2
DR. STUART FISCHBEIN: Usually [00:16:25] is something that I do because as the hospital birth practitioner when it gets to somewhere all other things are not working and then the possibility is to do an external cephalic version which is a hand - on technique to try and turn the baby, and that is usually done in the hospital described that in just a second but the way I do it because I don't use meditation, I often will have a woman spend at least thirty minutes prior to the procedure with a medical therapist to put her in a relaxed state, I do believe there is pretty good evidence out there that this increases the success rate by just being totally relaxed.
OT, but I've been wondering for a while how strong the evidence is for recommending that babies should share a room with their parent (s) for at least the first six months of life?
The American Academy of Pediatrics stated that there was «evidence that exclusive breast - feeding for at least 4 months compared with feeding intact cow milk protein formula decreases the cumulative incidence of atopic dermatitis and cow milk allergy in the first 2 years of life» (22).
I realise this has been written for the US market but even there women are opting to stay at home with a midwife, where the hormones can be least disturbed, plus the evidence is overwhelming that this is not only safe but optimal for bonding.
While that «live - and - let - live argument» doesn't fly with me when it comes to truly non-nutritive foods like sugary birthday treats in the classroom or junk food in cafeterias, I think there's enough evidence (or at least controversy) over the nutritive value of milk that I'd keep it available.
These findings add to a growing body of evidence that has suggested breastfeeding may have multiple health and other benefits for children.12 28 The particular significance of the present findings is that they show the cognitive benefits that are associated with breastfeeding are unlikely to be short - lived and appear to persist until at least young adulthood.
However there is evidence that at least some children with hyperactive behaviour are made worse by one or more of a wide range of food.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z