Sentences with phrase «with average teachers»

If we could replace the bottom 5 - 8 percent of teachers with average teachers, we could perform as a nation near the top of the international math and science tests.

Assuming the lower - bound estimate of teachers» impact, U.S achievement could reach that in Canada and Finland if we replaced with average teachers the least effective 8 to 12 percent of teachers, respectively.

In 2008 — 09, with an average salary of $ 66,995, California ranked third behind New York with an average teacher salary of $ 69,118.

Our estimates imply that replacing a teacher whose value added is in the bottom 5 percent with an average teacher would increase students» cumulative lifetime income by a total of $ 1.4 million per classroom taught.

This has profound implications: Chetty and colleagues estimate that replacing a teacher whose value added is in the bottom 5 percent of the distribution with an average teacher would increase the present discounted value of students» lifetime income by more than $ 250,000 for a typical class (of 28 students).

Replacing a teacher from the bottom 5 percent of the cohort with an average teacher increases the lifetime earnings of a single student by $ 50,000.

Kane found that students «who are taught by a teacher in the bottom 5 percent of competence lose 9.54 months of learning in a single year compared to students with average teachers,» the judge noted in his ruling.

North Carolina continues with average teacher salaries among the lowest in the country.

A child with an average teacher who comes from a literate, economically secure, and stable family environment will, on average, have better achievement than a child with a superior teacher but with none of these contextual advantages.

Replacing the poorest performing 5 to 8 percent of teachers with an average teacher would, by my calculations, yield improved productivity and growth that amounts to trillions of dollars.

Assuming the upper - bound estimate of teachers» impact, U.S achievement could reach that in Canada and Finland if we replaced with average teachers the least effective 5 to 7 percent of teachers, respectively.

Replacing a teacher whose value added is in the bottom 5 percent with an average teacher would increase students» total lifetime incomes by more than $ 1.4 million for a typical classroom (equivalent to $ 250,000 in present value).

Still salaries didn't appear to much slow, with the average teacher salary rising slightly to $ 63,800, with 10 years experience, and $ 119,500 for administrators, with 19 years.

Contrast that with the average teacher, who peppers kids with 300 to 600 questions a day and waits an average of one second for each reply, and you have a recipe for what I call the «Global Questioning Crisis.»

Replacing the bottom 5 percent to 8 percent of teachers with average teachers could move the United States near the top of international math and science rankings with a present value of $ 100 trillion.

My own research suggests that replacing just 5 % to 8 % of the least effective teachers with an average teacher would noticeably boost the achievement of our current students and would pay off lavishly in the future, through their enhanced productivity and faster economic growth.

He finds that replacing the least effective 5 to 8 percent of all teachers with average teachers would bring the U.S. to a level of student achievement equivalent to that of Canada, and replacing the least effective 7 to 12 percent of teachers with those of average effectiveness would «move the United States to the level of the highest - performing countries in the world, such as Finland.»

«If you leave a low value - added teacher in your school for 10 years, rather than replacing him with an average teacher, you are hypothetically talking about $ 2.5 million in lost income,» Harvard Prof. John Friedman, a co-author of the research, told the Times.

«So if I replace 2 percent of the teachers with an average teacher, I get... almost 25 PISA points, and if I replace 6 percent of the teachers, I get 50 PISA points, which is the difference between the [PISA results for the] United States and Canada,» he said.

As Hanushek argues: «If you... replaced five to eight percent of the worst teachers with an average teacher, U.S. achievement would rise to somewhere between Canada and Finland.»

If we identify those far below average, eliminate them, and replace them with average teachers, then the resulting numeric mean for teaching quality in School A will be higher, but in reality not a single teacher has increased his or her teaching quality.

But if we could replace the bottom 5 % -10 % of teachers with an average teacher — not a superstar — we could dramatically improve student achievement.

«Computers can't replace the human interaction and understanding that an early years» teacher develops of their pupils, with an average teacher having thousands of interactions with their children every day.

Using the evidence from the most cost - effective secondary schools, with an average teacher salary of # 49,000 (2018) and 55 % of the school's income spent on teachers, we used our school funding model to look at the implications of the proposed national funding formula.

«If you leave a low value - added teacher in your school for 10 years, rather than replacing him with an average teacher, you are hypothetically talking about $ 2.5 million in lost income,» said Professor Friedman, one of the coauthors.