Sentences with phrase «with big transfer fees»

But everything has gone cold on big names especially those with big transfer fees.

«He was like the next best thing and came with a big transfer fee like Aubameyang too, so hopefully they can play at times together up front.»

As long as you have wenger in charge that wont happen and do nt be suprised to see Pavon get snatched with other teams and getting sold with bigger transfer fee!

When Mkhitaryan arrived in Germany in the summer of 2013, he was burdened with a big transfer fee and the pressure to replace Mario Götze.

Not exact matches

SEE ALSO: Neymar to Man Utd, Pogba to Chelsea: 10 BIGGEST names set for Premier League clubs before the transfer deadline Chelsea transfer news round up: Blues agree # 69m Pogba fee, battle with Man Utd for # 60m duo & more Chelsea transfer rumours

Galatasary have reportedly agreed a transfer fee with Arsenal for the big Frenchman, who has not started a game for the Gunners at all this year.

SEE MORE: Chelsea transfer news: Talks open to sign 36 - goal striker who could command British record fee Chelsea considering astonishing transfer u-turn for # 65m former Blues flop Chelsea in hunt for big - name striker, with Juventus, Napoli and Everton stars on list

With transfer fees continually on the rise and this summer seeing some crazy prices paid for players, such as the signing of rumoured Arsenal transfer target Gonzalo Higuain by Italian champions Juventus and the crazy money set to be shelled out by Manchester United for their former youth star Paul Pogba, is this why Arsenal have made just one big transfer so far?

Should Icardi end up agreeing this reported new deal with Inter, it'll come as a big boost to them, but a big blow to Chelsea, as it now seems that the Blues will have to fork out a huge transfer fee to sign the ace, one that would be a club record.

Maybe you are right but of the rumoured 150M we still have payment commitments from previous transfers that have not been completed, then wages which will be a big issue since a 40 - 60M player will probably be on 180 - 200k, also we will most likely be getting a reject like James Rodriguez or Turan since we are out of the champions league and if they are on the same level as ozil then we might as well not bother with them, then add onto the fact it may not be easy to get rid of our unwanted players like Walcott for example who will pay his 140k ontop of a 20M transfer fee?

The current situation in the Premier League and in some clubs around Europe must be hurting Arsene Wenger, because whereas Arsenal used to have to deal with just a few really big spending clubs swiping the best players, including our own top talent like van Persie, Fabregas and all, the Frenchman is now seeing huge transfer fees being splashed around by every man and his dog.

Like them, Arsenal still can not really compete with our big rivals when it comes to transfer fees and wages so perhaps we need to take a leaf out of their book and make sure that we have a keeper that will earn us vital points when maybe we don't deserve them or to make the difference in the really big games against the likes of United.

As well as the fans the English media can be brutal, especially with that sort of money and will expect you to hit the ground running, and more often than not we've witnessed the next big sensation command a hefty transfer fee only for him not to adjust to the rigours of the Premier league and their confidence to be damaged irreparably (exhibit A Lazar Markovic — or Falcao).

also other big clubs will want them... so clubs like chelsea, psg, man city etc can blow us out the water with transfer fee and wages

I agree with Wenger's point that «Big» players can be bought for transfer fees that are not big, and a few hidden gems turn out to be big players despite not costing much, but it's only a fBig» players can be bought for transfer fees that are not big, and a few hidden gems turn out to be big players despite not costing much, but it's only a fbig, and a few hidden gems turn out to be big players despite not costing much, but it's only a fbig players despite not costing much, but it's only a few.

Even someone with as big an ego as Mou will know that another # 5M in wages to keep an unhappy player on the bench and the loss of a # 10 - 12M transfer fee is not worth it.

Le Prof would NEVER spend that type of transfer fee on the lad but much like you've said Mick the big Belgian, if healthy would consisently be a 20 - 30 goal scorer with Ozil / Santi / Rambo / Sanchez and the likes feeding him on a weekly basis.

Liverpool parted with the huge big - money transfer fee as they looked to sure up their defence.

The Catalan giants have been heavily linked with a move for a big - name signing for weeks, especially after the exit of Neymar who joined Paris Saint - Germain earlier this month for a world - record transfer fee.

Given he is under contract until 2020, Valencia will be in a strong position to demand a hefty fee for him, and so that could be another determining factor with few likely to back Arsenal in a transfer war with big - spending City who will be expected to give Guardiola plenty of financial backing this summer to bolster his squad after a disappointing opening campaign in England.

Alexis will know in 12 months time he could get more than now, no transfer fee and we would have to compete with others to keep him... Could be a big final payday still as long as he performs this season.

So I read with interest the Sky Sports report that claims that Southampton are willing to sell their own midfield warrior Victor Wanyama, as long as we are willing to pay a big transfer fee to get him.

It's added that Tielemans would command a transfer fee of # 25m +, while Inter, Juventus, Monaco and Paris Saint - Germain are all keen on the midfield ace too which could set up a real transfer war this summer with Europe's finest aiming to land one of the next big potential stars.

In our desperation for a new striker we might end up signing the wrong guy for a transfer fee he's not worth, this Lacazette is not all that and there's a reason why no big teams are after him even despite his 48 goals in Ligue 1, even though I'm not a fan of Giroud I would rather stick with him with Sanchez as second striker like Griezmann for France than sign Lacazette

Jose Mourinho has spent a great deal on big names since taking over at United, with an # 89m move for Griezmann enough to match the club's current record transfer fee paid for Paul Pogba last year, as reported at the time by BBC Sport.

Chelsea, like Arsenal, no longer compete with the Manchester clubs in fanning the wild flames of transfer fee inflation leaving them as big six also - rans with the feel of a famous 1970's rock band who continue to tour under the same name but with none of the original line - up.

In the January transfer window, the Reds were once again linked with a big - money move for the speedster but Virgil van Dijk was the only player to sign for Liverpool, with his # 75 million move a world record fee for a defender.

The CIES Football Observatory Weekly Post number 219 presents the 50 big - 5 league players with the most positive gap between their current transfer value and the fee paid for them by their employer club.

Arsene Wenger made big mistake to buy Masut Ozil with record transfer fee at Arsenal history.

The Sun has reported that Sandro would most likely cost around # 70 million, which is a massive transfer fee for a left - back — one which will see the media criticise the club for spending another big chunk of cash with teams like Manchester City having a ceiling price for a player and seemingly make these options work.

After a January transfer window of high drama, Darren Bent believes some of the limelight following his big - money switch from Sunderland to Villa was taken away because of the handsome fees that were shelled out on Andy Carroll and Fernando Torres, with Sportinglife.com claiming the England striker to be the» forgotten man».

Among other things including embezzlement and tax fraud, Mamic is charged with illegally keeping a big chunk of the transfer fee from Spurs for himself rather than for Dinamo.

AC.Milan was the first truly big European club that Thiago Silva joined in a transfer that was completed back on 2009 for a transfer fee which is believed to be in the region of $ 10 million and after spending 3 seasons with the Italian club, Ac.Milan offloaded him to PSG for around $ 42 million.

While balance transfers do come with some catches (such as an up - front balance transfer fee for some cards), you could in fact be tossing away big money by not considering it.

You may think it's not really a big deal, but the average balance transfer fee is 3 % of the total balance transfer with the minimum finance charge of $ 5 and a maximum charge of around $ 75.

Am I better off paying the minimum on the big card, paying as much as I can every month on the new card, and then doing another transfer (with 3 % fee) every month?

Neither card charges foreign transaction fees, and they both come with big sign - up bonuses, reasonable annual fees, fantastic earning categories and the ability to transfer points to seven different airline partners, including several international carriers.

The biggest difference from the Chase Slate to the Citi Simplicity is, with the Slate card there is no balance transfer fee for the first 60 days.

But if you're looking to capitalize on a big sign - up bonus, take advantage of bonus rewards categories or have the option to transfer points to potentially increase their value, you're better off checking out an alternative no - annual - fee card with a far better earning scheme.