Wolfe has taken it upon himself to explain various aspects of science — having to do
with biological evolution, linguistics, psychology and cognitive neuroscience — to scientists, in the process disparaging titans in their fields such as Charles Darwin and Noam Chomsky.
If one follows Whitehead in extrapolating from human experience, one can find in this interpretation of the divine priority a doctrine of creation that is compatible
with biological evolution: in the concept of God supplying a «lure» to evolution, «process» thinking approximates to that of Teilhard de Chardin.
The Bible could be read as the evolutionary or progressive discovery of the truth about God, a truth that is quite compatible
with biological evolution.
As for the Second Law of Thermodynamics, this has nothing to do
with biological evolution.
If we compare
it with biological evolution on different Geological Time Scale first developed life was also in the form of fish which originated during Cambrian period.
Not exact matches
Here's how the groups put it in their official release on the guidelines, dubbed the NIA - AA Research Framework: Towards a
Biological Definition of Alzheimer's Disease: «This
evolution of the previous diagnostic criteria is in line
with most chronic diseases that are defined biologically,
with clinical symptoms being a... consequence....
EDITORIAL COMMENT: Mr McEwan would seem to be right (i) in his depiction of Professor Ayala's somewhat deistic leanings concerning the role of the creator (see our Cutting Edge column July 2010), (ii) that we,
with Ayala, affirm that physical, chemical and
biological evolution is a well attested fact, and (Hi) that the idea that this process is a chance one does not work.
scot, It's one thing to believe so deeply that you eschew
evolution or the
biological fact that humans are animals, it's entirely another to willfully misrepresent statements by others to support your position, and to deride and taunt people
with other positions.
consciousness is present in all matter, just like gravity it is inherent and innate to everything produced after the big bang, only its level of existence varies
with evolution, highest is that of living things, at the top is us humans because of the
biological nature of our existence we evolve fastest and our brains has attained the highest level of complexity
How many Catholics realize that Pope Pius XII's 1950 encyclical, Humani generis, indicates that duscussion of
biological evolution is compatible
with Christian faith (# 36)-- as long as God's intervention is recognized as necessary for creating the human soul.
By the end of the 19th century the scholars of Protestant liberalism had fully accepted the humanistic origins of the Bible, come to terms
with the scientific notion of
biological evolution, and were completely confident that the essential core of Christian doctrine could be salvaged intact and re-expressed in terms relevant to the modern age.
The term moderate
evolution might therefore be applied to a theory which simply inquires into the
biological reality of man in accordance
with the formal object of the
biological sciences as defined by their methods and which affirms a real genetic connection between that human
biological reality and the animal kingdom, but which also in accordance
with the fundamental methodological principles of those sciences, can not and does not attempt to assert that it has made a statement adequate to the whole reality of man and to the origin of this whole reality.
Another form of this dualism is the commonly made claim that the evolutionary process continues on the human level
with cultural
evolution, which is totally distinct from
biological evolution.
Clearly, we need a solid exposition of how such imperfection might all fit together
with orthodox teaching and
biological evolution.
The conference is subtitled «A critical appraisal, 150 years after The Origin of Species,»
with regard to Charles Darwin's seminal work on
biological evolution, published in November 1859.
But, in fact, he was struggling valiantly
with the idea of the
evolution of the subjective both in this book and in The
Biological Basis of Human Freedom (BBHF).
«
Evolution is any change across successive generations in the heritable characteristics of
biological populations» so, what you have to say is «
Evolution by an entirely random process
with out supernatural intervention» and, unfortunately that doenst really say anything yet..
It wants to be a thoroughgoing thinking of becoming, though in such a way that can be accounted not only for the becoming of nature,
with both its «degradation of energy» and its «upward course of
biological evolution» (Whitehead, Function xx) but for history, too,
with also its progression and its degeneration.
You don't have to agree
with the principles of
biological evolution after learning this stuff, but you will at least see why you house example is so far off the mark.
3At present, for example, the well - entrenched neo-Darwinian hypothesis of «gradualism» (
biological evolution occurs slowly, and more or less continuously as the constant interplay of random variations and natural selection over vast periods of time) is confronted
with a somewhat more radical and neo-Lamarckian theory of «punctuated equilibrium» favored by Harvard biologists Stephen Jay Gould and Peter Williamson, collaborated by fossil discoveries of paleontologist and cultural anthropologist Richard Leakey in Africa.
Theistic
evolution or evolutionary creation is a concept that asserts that classical religious teachings about God are compatible
with the modern scientific understanding about
biological evolution.
The best evidence of
evolution is still the fossil record
with its discrete and progressive order of
biological forms.
The natural process of
biological evolution can not explain the concurrent appearance of a highly advanced ecology in conjunction
with the explosive introduction of the first true multicellular animals.
For though Darwin's particular theory of
biological evolution was destined to undergo changes and modifications in the hands of successive biologists and zoologists (and
with this we are not here concerned), there can be no going back to the simple Biblical picture of origins which was commonly held before Darwin.
Their claim was that Fr George Coyne's publicsupport for the Darwinian idea of
biological evolution had brought him into conflict
with other Vatican doctrinal officials, and so brought about his replacement.
The
biological doctrine of
evolution has also evolved since Darwin's day, being first transformed by classical genetics and later by molecular biology,
with plenty of controversy still associated
with the contemporary understanding of how
evolution occurs.
One can readily see that the theory of
biological evolution is completely at variance
with what had hitherto been the common view of origins.
Thus,
biological evolution appears to be associated
with a final causation or teleology — the reciprocal maintenance and proliferation of adaptive species over the phylogenetic scale in an evolving and stable physical universe.
Many of the speakers, including many of the scientists, starting
with the very opening paper by Cambridge palaeobiologist Simon Conway - Morris, were keen to emphasise above all that whilst accepting fully the rectitude of the science of the
biological theory of
evolution (mutation
with natural selection), yet a «totality of explanation it is not» (Conway - Morris's words).
It aimed to follow an itinerary which began
with the evidence for
evolution in the
biological world, and moved gradually towards its relevance and interpretation in the theological sphere, via the intermediary disciplines of anthropology and philosophy.
He develops his argument against atypically atheistic Darwinism around the fact of evolutionary convergence: «The central point is that because organisms arrive repeatedly at the same
biological solution... this provides not only a degree of predictability, but more intriguingly points to a deeper structure to life...» His viewpoint is quite clear: «Metric - sized animals that are the end - result of many billions of years of prior stellar and
biological evolution may be the only way to allow at least one species to begin its encounter
with God.
In the process perspective,
biological evolution is seen not just as involving mechanical changes say to the heart as a pump, but internal changes whereby the experience or internal relations becomes richer in a human being as compared
with a mosquito.
Besides our capacity for abstract thought, our mastery of fire, and our obsession
with reality television, the simple fact of being bipedal has had drastic effects in our ongoing
biological and social
evolution.
Common garter snakes, along
with four other snake species, have evolved the ability to eat extremely toxic species such as the rough - skinned newt — amphibians that would kill a human predator — thanks to at least 100 million years of
evolution, according to Joel McGlothlin, an assistant professor of
biological sciences in the College of Science and a Fralin Life Science Institute affiliate.
Babies are born
with the ability to learn and use language, a feature of human behavior that, like other behavioral capabilities, emerged from eons of
biological evolution — a scientific explanation that author Tom Wolfe rejects in his new book, The Kingdom of Speech.
«These findings demonstrate a single origin of gills that likely corresponds
with a key stage in vertebrate
evolution: when some of our earliest relatives transitioned from filtering particles out of water pumped through static bodies to actively swimming through the oceans,» says lead author Dr Andrew Gillis, a Royal Society University Research Fellow in Cambridge's Department of Zoology, and a Whitman Investigator at the Marine
Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, US.
The
evolution of human biology should be considered part and parcel
with the
evolution of humanity itself, proposes Nicole Creanza, assistant professor of
biological sciences.
We also know that cancers
with low levels of WWOX tend to be more aggressive and less responsive to treatment,» says Professor Rob Richards, Head of Genetics and
Evolution in the University's School of
Biological Sciences.
«Comparing human, chimpanzee and bonobo cells can give us clues to understand
biological processes, such as infection, diseases, brain
evolution, adaptation or genetic diversity,» says senior research associate Iñigo Narvaiza, who led the study
with senior staff scientist Carol Marchetto at the Salk Institute in La Jolla.
These mutations varied tremendously between populations, which counters a popular view that many of the differences between populations arose by chance or were genetic variants that hitchhiked along
with other genes that improved reproductive success, says
biological anthropologist Henry Harpending of the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, and co-author of another study of accelerated
evolution.
From this we compared the genomic distributions of our hotspots to the genomic distribution of various features associated
with genome
evolution and genes that participate in particular
biological processes.
«In the course of
evolution, Nature has developed strategies that endow
biological processes
with exquisite selectivity and specificity, and produce superior materials and structures,» says Aizenberg.
«Anatomically modern humans colonized Europe around 45,000 - 43,000 years ago, replacing Neanderthals approximately 3,000 years later,
with potential cultural and
biological interactions between these two human groups,» said Professor Hervé Bocherens, a biogeologist at the Senckenberg Center for Human
Evolution and Palaeoenvironment at the University of Tübingen, Germany, and lead author of a study published in the journal Scientific Reports.
«Our faculty members have been very successful in obtaining support from the National Science Foundation, including major research equipment grants and grants for cooperative training and instructional projects such as projects for training graduate students in
biological and cultural
evolution together
with the WSU Department of Anthropology, and for training undergraduates in mathematical biology together
with the Department of Mathematics.»
Core NYCEP faculty at NYU are based in the
Biological Anthropology section of the doctoral program in the Department of Anthropology,
with an emphasis on research broadly related to the study of human
evolution, molecular primatology and primate behavior.
It was pretty groundbreaking stuff at the time, because rather than the prevailing, societally accepted view, which believed that man was at the apex of all things, Darwin put forth this idea that each species followed its own independent course of
evolution, but
with repeating structures and patterns, common solutions to
biological problems appearing again and again.
That is the challenge we face today to achieve the MDGs, to which we must reply
with a new awareness - identity of «Homeland - Earth», where the human being is seen as a same
biological specie
with the same
evolution, because the future history of our biosphere will depend of the future history of knowledge we develop and how we choose to apply it.
However, over long time periods, the variation of the global average temperature
with CO2 concentration depends on various factors such as the placement of the continents on Earth, the functionality of ocean currents, the past history of the climate, the orientation of the Earth's orbit relative to the Sun, the luminosity of the Sun, the presence of aerosols in the atmosphere, volcanic action, land clearing,
biological evolution, etc..
In the case of a
biological reactor,
evolution tells us that over time this will lead to replacement of the unstable design
with a more stable design.
The loss of sea ice is interesting, but the melt of permafrost
with subsequent, rapid
biological evolution of CH4 is a really big story.