Sentences with phrase «with certain feelings»

Sometimes this stuckness has to do with certain feelings, sometimes it is about past traumas, often it shows up as repeating patterns in significant relationships, and sometimes it manifests as a malaise in which a direction in life seems impossible to find.»

Children begin to associate food with certain feelings.»

It does this by rewarding your with certain feel - good neurotransmitters like dopamine, serotonin and endorphins.

It's the most beautiful car you'll see in the parking lot and that comes with a certain feeling of pride when you press the unlock button on your key fob and start heading its way knowing that people in the vicinity will be looking at you with some level of envy, but only you know the kind of headaches that come with it.

Not exact matches

For certain roles, the manager in charge of hiring for that position will take candidates to meet the team they would be working with to see if both sides feel comfortable with the other.

It was about a certain economy of space, that it worked big, small, embroidered, that's a lot different than just going with what feels good.

Sometimes your employees won't feel comfortable coming to you with certain issues because of that.

For the same reasons regular people feel emotional connections to certain movies, songs, and television shows, moguls have a track record of becoming enamored with «content,» even when that leads them to make bad financial decisions.

Often entrepreneurs grow their company to a certain point and feel comfortable with the position attained.

I feel like I can instantly identify with most business owners / business starters on a certain level — because we've learned similar lessons through the school of hard knocks.

Children learn by example, so if they see you struggling with poor body image, they'll almost certainly get the message that they need to meet a certain physical ideal to feel comfortable in their own skin.

The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for... doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance to change,» while reprimanding those who «give excessive importance to certain rules,» overemphasize «ecclesial rules,» believe that «doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior to others because they observe certain rules,» have «an answer for every question,» wish to «exercise a strict supervision over others» lives,» «long for a monolithic body of doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we give glory to God... simply by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on others like heartless judges, lording it over them and always trying to teach them lessons.»

The historian Jules Isaac... obtained an interview with Pius XII in June 1949 and felt he was heard «with good will and understanding sympathy»... During the 1950's, the signs of understanding increased in the Vatican media, particularly at Christmas or Unity Week; the philo - Semitic orientation of certain religious orders; the effort to understand Judaism in theology schools, and meetings in ecumenical settings, no longer met with distrust by Roman Congregations.

As with Rachel, these students provide valuable insights, particularly to instructors who feel that certain works are too difficult for students to understand.

One thing is certain to a pastor: the only parishioners fighting the old battles are old themselves, their felt banners frayed and their guitar strings broken, while a young battalion is rising, with no animus against the atrophied adolescence of their parents, and only eager to engage a real spiritual combat in a culture of death.

Granted humans can't literally control weather with emotions, but enough people feeling a certain way could have a slight affect on weather patterns.

The Holy Spirit gives us a certain feeling if the man belongs with us.»

I either go with them to the clinic or feel certain they will go on their own.»

They talk to Christ like I talk to Pan, and we both feel a certain «presence» when we commune with our gods.

I felt safer with those people than I've ever felt in certain states in this country.

As we gather (or don't) with certain family members or friends, our feelings of loneliness, lack of personal fulfillment or longing for something we don't yet have tends to weigh on us a bit more heavily.

More often than we're comfortable admitting, I think, we find ourselves feeling what many recent theologians say we should: a twinge of uneasiness at speaking of heaven outside of church; the sense that Jesus» death and resurrection can't quite be brought to bear on our daily routine, our social life, our moneymaking, our recreation; an inability to see with the heart the goodness of the Good News; a certain emptiness in our prayers.

Why do they feel that only certain prayers said in the right way, and with certain actions and in specific rituals actually «work?»

The various institutions of» religion grew up only after and as a result of certain attitudes, first felt by the individual, subsequently shared with a group.

Particularly illustrative of the gradual development of Buber's dialogical thought is his progressive reinterpretation of the feeling of unity with certain objects of nature.

This conception of present psychophysiological knowledge allows the assumption that certain types of cerebral processes are identical with the experienced «raw feels.»

The couple is in touch with certain of the feelings that are actually generated by the experience, but they are not in touch with all of them.

And once you adopt the basic beliefs, you are expected to automatically adopt any other belief that comes along with that particular religion even though one may not reason and / or feel that certain aspects are right.

I think that atheists must often feel like outsiders with regard to a certain dimension of our national experience.

No third party could be effective, he felt, unless it displaced one of the major parties — in which case it would become a competitor for power, with its idealism and sincerity certain to be «diluted with opportunism and corrupted with the lust of office and the greed for the spoils of office» (October 19, 1932).

I had a fascinating conversation with Max Stackhouse of Andover - Newton Seminary who felt that one of our greatest needs in the subject area of this book was for an examination of the history of preaching on certain texts as the «Rich Young Ruler» to see how sermons related to different contexts.

In this chapter we are simply showing that the use of the term «on the third day» does not necessarily mean that Paul was familiar with the account of the empty tomb, and that some scholars feel quite certain that he was not.

I shall never forget the impact on my ministry when I sat down a few years ago and jotted on paper «the great rocky facts of being» (Augustus Hopkins Strong): some elementary but elemental truths I felt certain of, with certainty defined as «no doubt about it» but as «convictions by and for which one lives and dies.»

At the same time, I have felt a certain sympathy with more traditional Christians who have argued that many liberals have undersold one» vital element of the faith an actual, loving God.

As prehended by a certain actual occasion, God is that unity of feelings which result from the integration of his primordial nature with his prehensions of the past actual world of that actual occasion.8

Do we know for certain that we feel with our hands, see with our eyes, hear with our ears, etc.?

Even opponents of terrorism may feel a certain moral ambivalence when faced with acts of terror.

To make the point he quotes Dawkins» own «perceptive» summary of Lot in The God Delusion: «If this dysfunctional family was the best that Sodom had to offer by way of morals, some might begin to feel a certain sympathy with God and his judicial brimstone» (Cheekily adding, «Well, Rabbi Dawkins, I think I'm very happy with that gloss!»)

As between the old Christian America, which did, it can not be denied, visit the Jews with certain discomforts, and the new atheist America, which goes straight for the jugular of their children and their children's children, how can America's Jews feel there is even any choice?

So, there I was, pondering, with an old familiar feeling of perplexity (about which more anon), certain reactions to my reaction to various reactions to the pope's last encyclical, when it occurred to me that the one thing on which Hegelians of every stripe — right or left, theological or....

Just about anything people have grown up with or live with becomes natural and people tend to feel absolutely certain about a lot of things they have no basis for believing.

I can not but think that the most important step forward that has occurred in psychology since I have been a student of that science is the discovery, first made in 1886, that, in certain subjects at least, there is not only the consciousness of the ordinary field, with its usual centre and margin, but an addition thereto in the shape of a set of memories, thoughts, and feelings which are extra-marginal and outside of the primary consciousness altogether, but yet must be classed as conscious facts of some sort, able to reveal their presence by unmistakable signs.

I feel God's pleasure when I discover something new about a certain Greek word in Luke 4:18 which I can then share with others through teaching or writing.

Yes, some of them do come off as feeling superior, and they feel that way because they are certain that they have managed to deduce the «correct» meanings to Bible verses with their cleverness over millions of other believers and the scholars who build their careers studying them,... and they accuse us of having inflated egos!

However, as we look around today and ask what conditions seem on the whole to make for happiness in marriage, we are driven to the curious conclusion that the more «civilized people become the less capable they seem of lifelong happiness with one partner» (p. 135) For a marriage to work requires that there «be a feeling of complete equality on both sides; there must be no interference with mutual freedom; there must be the most complete physical and mental intimacy; and there must be a certain similarity in regard to standards of value» (p. 143).

At least, our experience of the animals with whom we live is that they exhibit behaviors similar to many of our own; that those behaviors clearly seem to be signs of emotional and mental qualities familiar to us from our own knowledge of ourselves; that animals possess distinctive individual traits, characteristics that are irreducibly personal (even if we feel obliged to recoil from that word on metaphysical principle), their own peculiar affections and aversions, expectations and fears; that many beasts command certain rational skills; and that all of this makes some kind of natural appeal to our moral sense.

The eastern wing felt as strongly that the panel had to approach its work with a certain disinterestedness and critical distance and that its primary task was the education of the church in film discrimination.

The case has been made that childhood was invented — which it was, at least in the sense that certain societies began to feel that young children should be excluded from the workforce, and women with them, to some extent at least.

I think this is a myth that we probably have had forever, but I think I really see it with this younger generation, where we have taught them «Listen to your heart; expect your job to feel a certain way... find your mission, find your why and then go live out of it.»

When certain sciences, such as psychology, study particular feelings, they do their work in an objective fashion, i.e., with other people's emotions.