When I decided to revise the novel I stopped printing and now that the revisions done I'm shopping around for an agent so I can have a
chance with a commercial publisher.
She also touches on something I've pointed out before, which is that holding up someone like Hocking as an argument for why you should self - publish makes exactly as much sense as holding up Rowling to prove you should
go with a commercial publisher.
With the addition of new search features the free legal database is continually closing the
gap with the commercial publishers, who will have to develop completely innovative services to take legal research to the next level... [more]
To me, doing that is just common sense... but
with commercial publishers charging as much for ebooks as they do for print ones, I guess Amazon felt the need to put common sense in writing.
Doreen, believe it or not, even
authors with commercial publishers would like to know the answer to the distribution question and so would be interested in a future post about that.
A: I intend to continue
working with commercial publishers, but I also hope to expand my list of self - published titles to accommodate those special books that I want to develop in a specific way.
Inevitably institutes develop a need for publishing skills and recruit the necessary talents either on the payroll, in
partnership with commercial publishers or (frequently) a combination of the two.
With the addition of new search features the free legal database is continually closing the
gap with the commercial publishers, who will have to develop completely innovative services to take legal research to the next level.
So many institutes could and should benefit from working
with commercial publishers, and in some cases, vice versa.