Sentences with phrase «with court judgments against»

Yet it is the protection of Huntington renters insurance that we all really need, from the liability protection that can help you deal with court judgments against you to the personal contents coverage that safeguards your belongings against covered loss or damage.

Not exact matches

Gawker Media founder and CEO Nick Denton will file for personal bankruptcy protection as early as Monday after losing a fight in a Florida court for a shield against a judgment in a breach of privacy case involving professional wrestler Hulk Hogan, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Appellate court confirms judgment against Credit Suisse Group AG DALLAS — February 21, 2018 — Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P. and NexPoint Advisors, L.P. announce today that the Texas Court of Appeals confirmed an aggregate $ 351 million award in favor of the Highland Floating Rate Opportunities Fund (NYSE: HFRO)(«HFRO») and the NexPoint Credit Strategies Fund (NYSE: NHF)(«NHF», and together with HFRO, tcourt confirms judgment against Credit Suisse Group AG DALLAS — February 21, 2018 — Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P. and NexPoint Advisors, L.P. announce today that the Texas Court of Appeals confirmed an aggregate $ 351 million award in favor of the Highland Floating Rate Opportunities Fund (NYSE: HFRO)(«HFRO») and the NexPoint Credit Strategies Fund (NYSE: NHF)(«NHF», and together with HFRO, tCourt of Appeals confirmed an aggregate $ 351 million award in favor of the Highland Floating Rate Opportunities Fund (NYSE: HFRO)(«HFRO») and the NexPoint Credit Strategies Fund (NYSE: NHF)(«NHF», and together with HFRO, the...

After Meggett failed to respond to her support suit (he did not dispute paternity but did claim that he had never been served with the papers), Estabrook went to court seeking a default judgment against him.

In one case, Denenberg allegedly prepared a «fake order» in which the court granted his client a motion for summary judgment, dismissing a claim against it with prejudice, the suit said.

After the judgment, the EFCC lawyer, Idris Mohammed, urged Justice Hassan to award a cost of N5m against Ogungbeje for wasting the judicial time of the court with his application.

At the hearing of the appeal, Daudu faulted the judgment of the appeal court on among other grounds that it erroneously affirmed the competence of the proceedings of the Code of Conduct Tribunal, which sat on the appellant's case with only two members as against the three provided for in the provisions of Paragraph 15 (1) of the Fifth Schedule to the 1999 Constitution.

Speaking with our correspondent on Thursday, the Anambra REC said its legal department had studied the judgments and asked it to go ahead with the election as ordered by the court of appeal as against the Tsoho Federal High Court judgcourt of appeal as against the Tsoho Federal High Court judgCourt judgment.

Appeal from judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Mark D. Fox, Magistrate Judge), which held that defendant Board of Education of the Newburgh Enlarged City School District intentionally discriminated against plaintiff Santina Polera in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and awarded damages to plaintiff.

(a) Whenever the Attorney General receives a complaint in writing signed by an individual to the effect that he is being deprived of or threatened with the loss of his right to the equal protection of the laws, on account of his race, color, religion, or national origin, by being denied equal utilization of any public facility which is owned, operated, or managed by or on behalf of any State or subdivision thereof, other than a public school or public college as defined in section 401 of title IV hereof, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly progress of desegregation in public facilities, the Attorney General is authorized to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section.

(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.

Even if you're not criminally charged with fraud, you can still be incarcerated in some states if the bank gets a judgment against you in civil court.

The court can award them with a judgment against you.

If you were served with a complaint but ignored it or failed to appear in court, the judge will most likely enter a default judgment against you in favor of the plaintiff and the plaintiff wins by default.

With most debts, the creditor has to go to court and secure a judgment against your spouse first, then apply for a court order.

Appellate court confirms judgment against Credit Suisse Group AG DALLAS — February 21, 2018 — Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P. and NexPoint Advisors, L.P. announce today that the Texas Court of Appeals confirmed an aggregate $ 351 million award in favor of the Highland Floating Rate Opportunities Fund (NYSE: HFRO)(«HFRO») and the NexPoint Credit Strategies Fund (NYSE: NHF)(«NHF», and together with HFRO, the... Read More... Readcourt confirms judgment against Credit Suisse Group AG DALLAS — February 21, 2018 — Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P. and NexPoint Advisors, L.P. announce today that the Texas Court of Appeals confirmed an aggregate $ 351 million award in favor of the Highland Floating Rate Opportunities Fund (NYSE: HFRO)(«HFRO») and the NexPoint Credit Strategies Fund (NYSE: NHF)(«NHF», and together with HFRO, the... Read More... ReadCourt of Appeals confirmed an aggregate $ 351 million award in favor of the Highland Floating Rate Opportunities Fund (NYSE: HFRO)(«HFRO») and the NexPoint Credit Strategies Fund (NYSE: NHF)(«NHF», and together with HFRO, the... Read More... Read More

If you own property and fall into arrears with an unsecured creditor, such as a credit card or line of credit, that creditor has the option to obtain a judgment from court and register a writ against your property.

If you can get a court judgment against that person, you would provide the Education Department with that as well as proof of your identity and possibly signature samples from the approximate date of the loan.

With every account holder who dies not respond to a court summons, or a false court summons, they get closer to getting a judgment against them.

Denying request for summary judgment, the Los Angeles Superior Court gave Activision the green light to go to trial with its $ 400 million contract interference lawsuit against Electronic Arts over Call of Duty creators Jason West and Vince Zampella.

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Busseri v. Doe, 2014 ONSC 819, dealt with the defendant's motion to set aside default judgment against him in an internet defamation case.

[3] In the «unusual circumstances» presented by the New Hampshire case, the Court used the doctrine against the State of New Hampshire, which had clearly and unequivocally argued a different interpretation of the phrase «middle of the [Piscataqua] river» in a separate 1977 consent judgment concerning border rights with Maine.

Because neither party obtained a monetary recovery, the claims against trustee were not dismissed, and plaintiff obtained an equitable judgment against trustee, the case — with respect to routine costs — fell within the catch - all provision of CCP § 1032 (a)(4) which allows the trial court discretion to determine the prevailing party by comparing the relief sought with that obtained, along with the parties» litigation objectives.

Settling (while class certification and summary judgment motions were pending) a statewide putative class action filed in San Mateo Superior Court for nuisance value with the named plaintiffs who alleged multiple wage and hour claims (unpaid regular and overtime wages, noncompliant meal and rest periods, untimely payment of final wages, noncompliant itemized wage statements, unpaid / forfeited vacation, and violation of PAGA) against a pharmaceutical supply company's call center;

In its judgment the court said the existence of the right of appeal given by the Child Support Act 1991 (CSA 1991), s 20 and the right to receive interest on arrears in prescribed circumstances given by s 41, when taken in conjunction with the right to seek judicial review of failures to collect or enforce arrears of maintenance, means CSA 1991 provides the parent with care with substantial protection against incompetence on the part of the CSA.

In a nutshell: the relevant jurisprudence concerning the applicable standard of review of intelligence sources and analysis was developed by the General Court in a series of judgments concerning the freezing of assets of the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran («PMOI») in connection with the EU's fight against terrorism.

The British Columbia Supreme Court has recently given judgment for Century 21 Real Estate company against a company (affiliated with Rogers Communications) that scraped real estate listing information from the Century 21 sites and repackaged it on its own site: Century 21 v Rogers Communications 2011 BC 1196.

«I am not prepared to adopt, as the defendant's argue, a blanket principle that an Ontario court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a common law action to recognize and enforce a foreign judgment against an out - of - jurisdiction judgment debtor in the absence of a showing that the defendant has some real and substantial connection to Ontario or currently possesses assets in Ontario... No jurisprudence binding on me has expressly placed a gloss on that ability to assume jurisdiction by requiring the plaintiff to demonstrate that the non-resident judgment debtor defendant otherwise has a real and substantial connection with Ontario.»

If a foreign court enters a judgment against someone by default that judgment will probably be enforceable in the country where the judgment was entered (or in the case of the U.S. in the state where it was entered with easy domestication to another U.S. state) against assets in that country.

In the course of proceedings before the tribunal between the commissioners and the taxpayer company, X, in relation to X's liability under a county court judgment for unpaid PAYE income tax and national insurance contributions, the tribunal awarded costs in the sum of # 30,500, against the commissioners because of their «serial failures to comply with the time limits in the tribunal, rules and directions».

Except in cases affecting the personal status of the plaintiff, and cases in which that mode of service may be considered to have been assented to in advance, as hereinafter mentioned, the substituted service of process by publication, allowed by the law of Oregon and by similar laws in other States, where actions are brought against non-residents, is effectual only where, in connection with process against the person for commencing the action, property in the State is brought under the control of the court, and subjected to its disposition by process adapted to that purpose, or where the judgment is sought as a means of reaching such property or affecting some interest therein; in other words, where the action is in the nature of a proceeding in rem.

I was discussing OXY USA Inc. v. Schell with a friend, and he came up with this puzzle: Supposing Company A is facing a lawsuit, has received a judgment against them in a district court, and has...

The same issue comes up at the state level when a court awards a money judgment against a state or local government with taxing power, or holds that a state government has insufficiently funded education as required by a state constitution.

Represented founder, President, and Chief Executive Officer of a distributor of consumer electronics with gross revenues of approximately $ 20 million in connection with all facets of companies» Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases, including critical strategic planning with respect to $ 45 million federal court judgment against Debtor - companies and their President.

On the third day of the trial, the Court agreed with the merits of the motion, and dismissed the case against Mr. Mavrick's client and entered judgment in favor of Mr. Mavrick's client.

In 2008, another federal court harshly dismissed his claims for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act against two other creditors, noting that Flury had «filed eleven lawsuits against various defendants over the last four years, and with the exception of one case that ended in a default judgment, plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed every action once the defendant moved to dismiss the case or otherwise responded to the complaint.»

Among other things: successfully obtaining the continuation of a US $ 2 billion freezing order under s. 25 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 in support of Russian proceedings; and successfully acting on an ex parte appeal against a Judge's refusal to grant a Chabra freezing order — the Order was granted by the Court of Appeal and continued on the return date (with Stephen Smith QC and Ben Griffiths).

Plaintiffs allege that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company conspired with Illinois Supreme Court Justice Lloyd Karmeier's campaign to elect Karmeier to the Supreme Court, with State Farm providing campaign funding in exchange for Karmeier's vote to overturn the judgment against them.

[9] Judgments or orders given in representative actions are normally binding on all persons represented in the claim, but may only be enforced by or against non-parties with the court's permission.

Even though the defendant based in Taiwan is served with all the legal documents, like the court notice and summons, in compliance with the foreign laws, the Taiwan court will accept the defendant's argument against the default foreign judgment that the legal documents are not served as per Taiwanese laws.

the person against whom the judgment was given submitted to the jurisdiction of that court by voluntarily appearing in the proceedings (which will not include submitting arguments on the merits where under local law, a challenge to jurisdiction can only be brought in conjunction with such arguments on the merits); or

The acte clair doctrine, first articulated in Cilfit (C - 283 / 81), states that in accordance with article 267 TFEU, a national court against whose judgment there is no higher appeal must refer a question to the ECJ when a question on the interpretation of EU law arises, unless the answer is «so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt».

Judicial Tribunal for the Dubai Courts and DIFC Courts awards Dubai Courts jurisdiction in «conduit» cases: The Judicial Tribunal for the Dubai Courts and the DIFC Courts, established in 2016 to rule on conflicts of jurisdiction and conflicts of judgments between the two courts, has issued two recent decisions in cases where claimants obtained an order from the DIFC Courts recognising arbitral awards made outside the DIFC, where there was no connection with the DIFC, and where the order recognising the award was referred for enforcement to the Dubai courts for enforcement against assets located Courts and DIFC Courts awards Dubai Courts jurisdiction in «conduit» cases: The Judicial Tribunal for the Dubai Courts and the DIFC Courts, established in 2016 to rule on conflicts of jurisdiction and conflicts of judgments between the two courts, has issued two recent decisions in cases where claimants obtained an order from the DIFC Courts recognising arbitral awards made outside the DIFC, where there was no connection with the DIFC, and where the order recognising the award was referred for enforcement to the Dubai courts for enforcement against assets located Courts awards Dubai Courts jurisdiction in «conduit» cases: The Judicial Tribunal for the Dubai Courts and the DIFC Courts, established in 2016 to rule on conflicts of jurisdiction and conflicts of judgments between the two courts, has issued two recent decisions in cases where claimants obtained an order from the DIFC Courts recognising arbitral awards made outside the DIFC, where there was no connection with the DIFC, and where the order recognising the award was referred for enforcement to the Dubai courts for enforcement against assets located Courts jurisdiction in «conduit» cases: The Judicial Tribunal for the Dubai Courts and the DIFC Courts, established in 2016 to rule on conflicts of jurisdiction and conflicts of judgments between the two courts, has issued two recent decisions in cases where claimants obtained an order from the DIFC Courts recognising arbitral awards made outside the DIFC, where there was no connection with the DIFC, and where the order recognising the award was referred for enforcement to the Dubai courts for enforcement against assets located Courts and the DIFC Courts, established in 2016 to rule on conflicts of jurisdiction and conflicts of judgments between the two courts, has issued two recent decisions in cases where claimants obtained an order from the DIFC Courts recognising arbitral awards made outside the DIFC, where there was no connection with the DIFC, and where the order recognising the award was referred for enforcement to the Dubai courts for enforcement against assets located Courts, established in 2016 to rule on conflicts of jurisdiction and conflicts of judgments between the two courts, has issued two recent decisions in cases where claimants obtained an order from the DIFC Courts recognising arbitral awards made outside the DIFC, where there was no connection with the DIFC, and where the order recognising the award was referred for enforcement to the Dubai courts for enforcement against assets located courts, has issued two recent decisions in cases where claimants obtained an order from the DIFC Courts recognising arbitral awards made outside the DIFC, where there was no connection with the DIFC, and where the order recognising the award was referred for enforcement to the Dubai courts for enforcement against assets located Courts recognising arbitral awards made outside the DIFC, where there was no connection with the DIFC, and where the order recognising the award was referred for enforcement to the Dubai courts for enforcement against assets located courts for enforcement against assets located there.

Apart from the proceedings of the CJC against Justice Camp, his decision was reversed on appeal, with the Alberta Court of Appeal stating that, «We are also persuaded that sexual stereotypes and stereotypical myths, which have long since been discredited, may have found their way into the trial judge's judgment»: R v. Wagar, 2015 ABCA 327 at para. 4.

In its judgment in Tsakouridis, the Court held that Article 28 (3) of Directive 2004/38 is to be interpreted as meaning that the fight against crime in connection with dealing in narcotics as part of an organised group is capable of being covered by the concept of «imperative grounds of public security» which may justify a measure expelling a Union citizen who has resided in the host Member State for the preceding 10 years.

This is the third time (yes, indeed) that Turkey's Constitutional Court dealt with this case — each time with identical facts (a woman asking to keep her name upon marriage)-- and the second time it has done so since the European Court of Human Rights delivered a violation judgment against Turkey on the very same issue.

The Court in Bindra explained its decision to do nothing with regards to the property in India as a «Catch 22 situation»: To grant her judgment against the Husband in Canada and still allow her to retain joint ownership of the Property in India would not be appropriate.

[10] This Court has no jurisdiction to suspend the precedential value of Grant Thornton Ltd. v. Alberta Energy Regulator and introduce another legal regime — the one in place before Chief Justice Wittmann released his judgment — for the governance of other bankrupts, receivers and trustees in bankruptcy and secured creditors for a period commencing with the date of pronouncement of any stay order and ending with the date the Supreme Court of Canada either resolves an appeal against this Court's judgment or dismisses the applicants» leave - to - appeal application.

If letters and private documents can thus be seized and held and used in evidence against a citizen accused of an offense, the protection of the Fourth Amendment declaring his right to be secure against such searches and seizures is of no value, and, so far as those thus placed are concerned, might as well be stricken from the Constitution... The tendency of those who execute the criminal laws of the country to obtain conviction by means of unlawful seizures and enforced confessions, the latter often obtained after subjecting accused persons to unwarranted practices destructive of rights secured by the Federal Constitution, should find no sanction in the judgments of the courts which are charged at all times with the support of the Constitution and to which people of all conditions have a right to appeal for the maintenance of such fundamental rights.

«Cause» shall mean any of the following events: (i) breach by either party of any of its obligations hereunder; (ii) misappropriation by either party of funds or property of the other party; (iii) any court injunction or judgment against either party relating to copyright or trademark infringement, or other unethical business practices; or (iv) the failure by either party to fulfill any of its obligations hereunder (v) vendor's non-compliance with state or local requirements.