Sentences with phrase «with dangerous levels of lead»

Some 1,000 children in Buffalo are diagnosed every year with dangerous levels of lead in their blood.

Not exact matches

Some of the formula recalls in the last few years have been triggered by the discovery of high levels of phytoestrogen hormones, high levels of aluminum and lead, bacterial contamination, unsanitary production linked to gastrointestinal illness, salmonella, and glass particles mixed in with the powder Researchers in the Netherlands found dangerous bacteria, which can cause meningitis and sepsis, in 52.5 percent of the formula samples they cultured from 35 countries.

Women with PCOS often develop small, fluid - filled cysts on their ovaries (hence the name), which are not dangerous but lead to higher levels of male hormones in the body.

Buffalo continues to have a lead poisoning crisis — hundreds of children were diagnosed with dangerous lead levels again last year — but you wouldn't know it by City Hall's slow rollout of its plan to deal with the problem.

It would also be used to hire a nurse dedicated to managing cases of children with lower - but - still - dangerous lead levels of lead poisoning that fall below 10 - microgram threshold.

The drug interaction interfered with drug metabolism and led to an accumulation of Seldane to dangerous levels.

THERE are grave flaws in a study which claims that replacing conventional cars with electric vehicles will expose people to dangerous levels of lead, according to industry and environmental groups.

Coupled with selenium deficiency, one can understand that excessive iodine intake can lead to dangerous levels of hydrogen peroxide production.

That's because these powders contain highly concentrated ingredients, and if the ingredients were grown with pesticides or other chemicals, you could end up consuming concentrated levels of lead, arsenic or other dangerous heavy metals.

As Mark Blois from Browne Jacobson LLP explains in his session, the key to being comfortable with legal duties is to have access to just the right level of information: a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing, but too much information can sometimes lead to paralysis.

The idea (quoted in the United Nations Environmental Programme report) that in order to be reasonably sure of avoiding dangerous and potentially irreversible climate change, a minimum of a 50 % cut in global emissions compared with 1990 levels is required by 2050, is based firmly on the IPCC - led consensus, contrary to the impression you appear to have.

As intriguing a concept as it is, a «tipping point» is less useful if poorly defined quantitatively or largely unknown, as apparently is the case with two key examples that you cite: thermohaline circulation and substantial melting of ice sheets leading to «dangerous» sea level rise.

I can point to experimental evidence showing the rapid build - up of CO2 in a car with a sleeping infant and windows closed leading to rapid temperature increase and death, but we are not living in closed cars, and the atmosphere's CO2 at even 760 ppmv falls well short of the dangerous levels in that experiment (which of course said nothing about radiation).

Georgia - based Exide took over the smelter in 2000 and ramped up the volume of batteries processed at the plant — and with it, emission levels of dangerous pollutants such as lead and arsenic.

«Capex Tracker is going to provide the world with a leading indicator to understand whether the flows of capital are set to create dangerous levels of climate change.