Sentences with phrase «with dangerous offenders»

Tomasi says Correctional Services Canada also offers yearly training programs for parole officers to update their skills in certain areas, such as supervising Aboriginal offenders, or working with dangerous offenders.
The update deals specifically with the dangerous offender provisions and forms a useful guide for criminal lawyers still seeking to get to grips with what are very complex provisions (see www.sentencing-guidelines.gov.uk).

Not exact matches

Grayling's reforms could prove dangerous, with initial reports suggesting a breakdown in communication over offender management
Republican Assemblymen Jim Tedisco and Steve McLaughlin and Sen. Hugh Farley held a news conference just before Memorial Day asking for a «three strikes» law that would hit multiple offenders with lifetime revocation, although that concept encompassed all forms of dangerous driving as opposed to crimes specifically related to drunken or drugged operation.
The Daily News reported today about repeated failures with the governor's initiative to move juvenile offenders from state run facilities into New York City programs that are obviously unequipped to handle the dangerous offenders.
Cleaning products tend to be the worst offenders and are some of the most dangerous to have around the house with kids.
Instead of relying on the Canadian criminal justice system to punish serious offenders in accordance with the law, to rehabilitate offenders, and working to reintegrate them into society, the federal government will deport potentially dangerous individuals to countries where they could pursue further violence against Canada and others.
«Ontario is the place you don't want to be if a dangerous offender or long - term offender application is on the table,» he says, adding it was shocking the attorney general allowed the Crown to go ahead with an application in this case in light of Klassen's findings.
According to the defence counsel in the matter, the case is one of the first since 2008 changes to the dangerous offender provisions to deal with the question of when a sexual offender isn't a dangerous offender.
Brodksy, who acted for J.D.S., says the case reflects the ease with which Ontario Crowns often seek and obtain dangerous offender designations given Klassen's comments that the offender was unlikely to reoffend.
The headline points are: ● prolonged, persistent and deliberate bad driving and consumption of drink and drugs puts offenders in the most serious category with jail sentences of at least seven years; ● a combination of these features of dangerous driving accompanied by aggregating factors, such as a bad driving record, attracts sentences towards 14 years; ● careless driving under the influence of drink or drugs provides for a longer sentence, as the degree of intoxication increases; ● regarding mobile phones — an offender distracted by a handheld mobile phone when the offence was committed will be treated as particularly serious; ● reading or composing texts over a period of time at the wheel is also likely to result in a higher level of seriousness and offenders should serve up to seven years in prison.
In 1967, some 46 years before Whatcott was decided, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld a lower court's finding that Everett George Klippert (a confessed homosexual) was a «dangerous sexual offender» on the basis that he «was likely to commit further sexual offences of the same kind with other consenting adult males.»
More than two years following implementation of the dangerous offender provisions in the Criminal Justice Act 2003, the Court of Appeal still has to grapple with complex sentencing issues.
This case continues with the theme of sentencing chaos following the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and once again grapples with the issues surrounding consecutive sentences for dangerous offenders.
Keywords: Criminal Law, Dangerous Offenders, Criminal Harassment, Failure to Comply with Probation Orders, Criminal Code, s. 753 (1)(a)(i), R v. Walters, 2012 ONSC 3567, Sentencing, R v. Boutilier, 2017 SCC 64, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 936
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z