Sentences with phrase «with deep emissions reductions»

Not exact matches

Achieving the 2025 target will require a further emission reduction of 9 - 11 % beyond our 2020 target compared to the 2005 baseline and a substantial acceleration of the 2005 - 2020 annual pace of reduction, to 2.3 - 2.8 percent per year, or an approximate doubling;» Substantial global emission reductions are needed to keep the global temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius, and the 2025 target is consistent with a path to deep decarbonization.

This target is consistent with a straight line emission reduction pathway from 2020 to deep, economy - wide emission reductions of 80 % or more by 2050.

«Only a plan that combines carbon pricing with ambitious regulations in every sector of the economy will result in emissions reductions deep enough to reach our current climate targets and put Canada on a path to exceeding those targets.»

When efficiency is combined with clean heating technologies, a deep emissions reduction pathway emerges.

We will need to see a deep decline if we are to limit dangerous climate change, and even with existing emissions - reduction commitments, global emissions are not expected to decline until at least after 2030.

It acknowledges that any plausible path toward climate mitigation will involve a lot of nuclear energy, carbon capture and natural gas, pushing back against the delusional claims of the mainstream environmental movement that deep reductions in emissions can be accomplished with present - day wind, solar and energy - efficiency technologies alone.

«With some level of warming and sea level rise already in the pipeline no matter what we do, we won't see a reduction in impacts or even a sudden levelling - off — impacts are projected to increase at the same rate in all scenarios for the next couple of decades or so, and after that they merely increase more slowly in the deep emissions cuts scenarios,» Betts told Mongabay.

That one was called RESPONSES, dealing with: «European responses to climate change: deep emissions reductions and mainstreaming of mitigation and adaptation.»

In 2018, strengthened INDCs would need to include (1) deeper emission reductions by 2030, (2) longer term targets with substantial cuts in emissions, and (3) participation by all nations.

The least cost way to achieve deep emissions reductions from electricity generation is with a high proportion of nuclear power.

The least cost option with deep CO2 emission reductions is with 70 % to 80 % nuclear and 10 % renewables.

«Achieving this goal will require deep global emissions reductions, with most countries including Australia eventually reducing net greenhouse gas emissions to zero or below.»

(Bernie Fraser, Chairman, Climate Change Authority): «The funding of the kind of scale that would be necessary to deal with the extra emissions reductions that Australia will have to pursue to do its bit to reduce global emissions makes it quite fanciful I think to think that the ERF could be scaled up and funded to the degree that one would think would be necessary»... (John Connor, CEO Climate Institute): «The debate is shifting into even deeper reductions that we need to have beyond 2020 and it shows that the emissions reduction fund is just an inadequate tool to be the primary tool for emission reductions, while the renewable energy target is a critical target that we need to be strengthening, not weakening.

Our results show that very aggressive future emissions reduction pathways, in which rapid and deep mitigation begins today (not 5 - 10 years earlier as in many emissions scenarios), would be approximately consistent with the long - term temperature goals of the Paris Agreement.

Moreover, low - carbon supply technologies can not deliver the necessary rate of emission reductions — they need to be complemented with rapid, deep and early reductions in energy consumption»