Sentences with phrase «with defendants»

First, is the plaintiff's evidence ambiguous, i.e., is it as consistent with the defendants» permissible independent interests as with an illegal conspiracy?

Since Alice, this strategy has been quite successful, with defendants winning more than 50 % of the motions to dismiss filed in 2015.

Generally, the Settlement includes Texas homeowners or automobile insurance policyholders who had certain types of insurance policies with the Defendants between October 1, 1999 and February 28, 2003.

-LSB-...] I agree with the defendants» submission that there should be some reasonable controls on the provision of information to the funder.

In the decision, Justice Juriansz appears to have signaled that Mr. Mehedi's request has merit, noting that the video tape «provides considerable support for Mr. Mehedi's position» and later suggesting that Mr. Mehedi «consider attempting to obtain the entire hidden camera interviews with the defendants.»

The claimant suffered injury when the car he was driving collided with the defendants» horse which had panicked and escaped with others from its field.

Video is hopeless with defendants suffering from mental deficiencies or language difficulties.

A defence lawyer reported: «I have had communication break down entirely with defendants who become agitated — it's a lot easier for them to become frustrated and take out their anger with a «face on a screen» than a human being in the room with them.»

Q: Do you think the Commission will seek settlements with defendants or push for rulings that impose fines?

Representing a US resident Russian businessman in US$ 55m dispute over control of Manx companies, two Gulfstream jet and various other assets, with defendants in the Isle of Man, US, Monaco and Russia

Hill recently served as the lead associate on two copyright infringement lawsuits regarding the Starz series «Power,» with defendants including Anchor Bay Entertainment, CBS Entertainment as well individuals like rapper 50 Cent.

On this point, the plaintiff was in agreement with the defendants / respondents CAFC and Mr. Hrynew; the employment and franchise contexts do not apply to the impugned commercial contract [paras 77 - 78, 84 of the Respondents» Factum].

Wifi One argued that the petitions were time - barred because Broadcom was in privity with defendants to a prior infringement action filed by the prior owner of the Wifi One patents.

Default judgment is the procedure for dealing with defendants who completely fail to engage with the court.

The motion judge agreed with the defendants and struck the claim.

Matters arising out of Claimants personal injury (industrial deafness) arising out of the Claimants» employment with the Defendants at their premises at Maylands Avenue, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire specifically relating to the Claimant's deafness caused by excessive noise at the Defendants premises from 1963 to 2003.

Bowen dismissed one count accusing Oasis of usury under the penal code, agreeing with the defendants that it was a criminal statute and so there was no private right of action under the law.

The district court agreed with the defendants and ruled that the shopping center did not have a duty to protect against criminally reckless drivers, so the accident «was not foreseeable as a matter of law,» and therefore no duty existed.

The litigation concerns claims made against the Defendants by subscribers to a film partnership scheme known as the Evolution Films Partnerships in connection with the Defendants» actions as (i) sponsor and promoter, (ii) administrator, and / or as appropriate (iii) tax and financial adviser in relation to the Evolution Films Partnerships.

(a) that the Claimants contracted with the Defendants to purchase package holidays at the Club Aguamar Hotel and stayed at the Club Aguamar Hotel between the dates set out in the schedule to the order, and (b) that the Claimants suffered gastric or other illness of various durations, and / or personal injury, and / or distress, inconvenience, loss and damage as a result of improper performance of the provision of services under the holiday contract, in respect of which the Claimants hold the Defendant liable (i) under the Package Travel, Package Holidays and Package Tours Regulations 1992, and / or (ii) by reason of breaches of the said contracts of various dates for the provision of holidays, made in writing, and within the jurisdiction of this Court, and / or (iii) by reason of the Defendant's negligence during the said period, and / or (iv) by reason of the Defendant's misrepresentations made on various dates and inducung the Claimants to enter the said contracts for the provision of holidays.

The same goes with defendants and insurers in personal injury cases.

He readily accepts challenges, working with defendants facing a multitude of charges, including sex crimes, drug crimes, federal offenses, fraud, theft, assault, felonies, property crimes, juvenile offenses, traffic offenses, and weapons crimes.

Damages at trial were assessed at just over $ 1.1 Million with the Defendants being jointly and severally liable.

After supporting the extensive investigation, and before proceedings, we robustly engaged with the defendants and were able to quickly achieve an excellent out of court settlement, bringing substantial monies back into the estate and enabling a dividend to creditors.

In a 5 - 4 vote, the court had agreed with the defendants that they had no alternative but to use the exact same drug labels as the ones used by the brand drug makers.

The Plaintiff ended its relationship with the Defendants in 2012, alleging that the Defendant's Chinese companies were selling clones of the Plaintiff's product in China.

[21] This is not a case where the plaintiffs were hired, had a long history with the defendants and where the defendants ran into financial difficultly, leaving the plaintiffs as creditors.

With respect to the comment «ham is not a toy» and repeated mischaracterization of the leftover ham steak as a ham sandwich, both attributed to Levesque, when coupled with the defendants» contemptuous laughter, the Court of Appeals concluded that viewers were encouraged «to form negative conclusions about Levesque, thus tending to harm his reputation».

The Defendants also argued that the act of negligence which formed the basis for Mr Justice Cross's liability finding had never been canvassed with the Defendants» witnesses at trial so that they might address or contest such alleged negligence.

On June 6, 2003, the Court granted preliminary approval to a $ 10 million settlement with defendants JSC Uralkali and JSC Silvinit.

A court hearing is set up to review the case with defendants engaging expert criminal lawyers in challenging the charges made by the prosecution which must prove the crime through:

As a psychologist, I have seen that our system struggles to cope with defendants whose alleged offence (s) were one side of an interaction with, or were determined by another stronger or more controlling person.

In a final written decision, the PTAB ruled that the challenged claims were unpatentable, and that Wi - Fi One had not proven the Broadcom was in privity with the defendants in the earlier infringement action.

«It involves balancing the interests of claimants with defendants, and also balancing the social costs of increased clinical negligence payouts and increased insurance premiums with protecting the interests of vulnerable claimants,» he added.

In MacDonald v. BMO, the firm is class counsel to those who held registered accounts with the defendants.

Wi - Fi One argued that Broadcom was in privity with the defendants in the earlier action, and thus the petition was barred under § 315 (b).

Like those capable replications on the small screen, our attorneys opt to go to trial rather than settle with defendants for sums that are a fraction of our clients could potentially receive should we take the case before a judge.

After Discovery is over, your lawyer will try to settle the lawsuit with the defendants» attorneys.

At times, the prosecutors aren't interested in negotiating with the defendants who represent themselves.

That nurse carefully recorded all of the events of that morning in the patient's chart and she also kept personal notes of all of her conversations with the defendants.

On June 15, 2012, the matter was resolved with the Defendants» agreement to pay $ 97 million for the properties at issue, $ 3 million for a litigation settlement fee and agreement to pay all of Plaintiff's fees and costs associated with the lawsuit.

The lawyers were unable to find the defendants to allow for personal service, but the defendants» Facebook profiles contained enough information to satisfy the court that it would provide a sufficient method of communicating with the defendants.

In respect of a passing off claim the Court examined the elements of the action and found that the defendants failed to establish that they had a reputation or goodwill with the average HD motorcycle rider, or owner in Canada — «that the average HD motorcycle owner knows of their existence and more importantly of the existence of their trademark and associate it with the defendants and no one else».

The Court found that that the mental association of the reasonable buyer of Harley - Davidson motorcycle clothing is instead made with the senior mark, HARLEY - DAVIDSON, rather than with the defendants.

The plaintiff in Raffles v. Wichelhaus (1864), 2 H. & C. 906 (LLMC), 159 E.R. 375 (Hein), 33 L.J.N.S. 160, claimed he had a contract with the defendants for the delivery of some cotton to the defendants in Liverpool «ex Peerless from Bombay» (a.k.a. Mumbai).

If a plaintiff can reach a settlement with some defendants, the amount of the settlement is deducted from total judgment.

«There are so many types of cases that can be handled... We can really work with defendants on dealing with this in areas of civil infractions, misdemeanors, just simple non-moving violations...

Tort remedies are essential to protect people (and their property) who do not have contractual relations with defendants from harms such as air and water pollution.

Although the federal court disagreed with the defendants» argument that the jury award could only have resulted from passion or prejudice, the Southern District of Florida held that the non-economic damages award was not logically supported by the evidence offered at trial.

The Canadian class action itself settled with the defendants agreeing to pay the class $ 2.1 billion.