Sentences with phrase «with dubious data»

In this digital era, the modern real estate client has access to any number of websites offering real estate market charts and trends, with dubious data being sourced.

Not exact matches

While crowd - sourced information can sometimes be dubious (we recognize the nature of sites like wikipedia), strong efforts are made to verify data confidence with multiple crowd - based websites before anything is included in this list.

The aim of my post is: with poor resolution data (temporal noise due to multi-year oscillations, geographical noise from local ocean level increases / decreases etc.) any claim of a clear signal is dubious.

Rabbeting on about climate scientists should do this and they should not put up with data of dubious quality is completely missing the point that they are not in charge of the data.

[IOW a lot of very dubious old data with much of the more reliable new Argo - based data either «excluded» or «corrected»).

That data does not agree with the tree proxies, and it gives the concept of AGW dubious support if any.

The criminal aspect is not only the failure of the alarmsits to observe these basic facts bu the Hockeystick fraud giving hundreds of times the weighting to faulty Bristlecone pine proxy data as to other sets in order to give a desired result, the blatant tampering of Data to warm the past with extremely dubious reasons, the NZ NWA scandal where they demonstrably altered data to fit the alarmist agenda, the Darwin Australia tampering, the crude attempt to prove a «hotspot» by making the base temperature representation red and thus appear hot in a now debunked graph etc Then there's the Nazi / Stalin / Lenin / Maoesque attempts to silence debdata as to other sets in order to give a desired result, the blatant tampering of Data to warm the past with extremely dubious reasons, the NZ NWA scandal where they demonstrably altered data to fit the alarmist agenda, the Darwin Australia tampering, the crude attempt to prove a «hotspot» by making the base temperature representation red and thus appear hot in a now debunked graph etc Then there's the Nazi / Stalin / Lenin / Maoesque attempts to silence debData to warm the past with extremely dubious reasons, the NZ NWA scandal where they demonstrably altered data to fit the alarmist agenda, the Darwin Australia tampering, the crude attempt to prove a «hotspot» by making the base temperature representation red and thus appear hot in a now debunked graph etc Then there's the Nazi / Stalin / Lenin / Maoesque attempts to silence debdata to fit the alarmist agenda, the Darwin Australia tampering, the crude attempt to prove a «hotspot» by making the base temperature representation red and thus appear hot in a now debunked graph etc Then there's the Nazi / Stalin / Lenin / Maoesque attempts to silence debate.

The temperature records before 1979 are rife with dubious TOBS and other adjustments that mostly serve to cool historical temperatures compared to the true raw data.

Which is not to say that I always agree with the interpretation of data or that often extremely scant and dubious data is given far more credence than it should.

Global warming is a question that many are saying is a catasrophe for the planet, that will determine the spending of trillions of dollars around the globe and yet Michael is worried about giving data to someone with a dubious argument?

How can you expect to be taken seriously in your crusade for open access to data, when the credibility of the arguments and the advocates you associate yourself with is so dubious?

NOAA even puts the IG's efforts at par with the efforts of others with dubious distinctions: «The findings in the Inspector General's investigation are similar to the conclusions reached in a number of other independent investigations into climate data stewardship and research that were conducted by the UK House of Commons, Penn State University, the InterAcademy Council, and the National Research Council, after the release of the stolen emails All of the reports exonerated climate scientists from allegations of wrong - doing.»