But this is to say that there is nothing in the least wrong
with the early church's criterion of canonicity, however mistaken its historical judgments in applying this criterion.
The «church» does not need to change its message as long as it is Jesus, as it was
with the early church.
We need to remember that orthodoxy was not a pre-supposition
with the early church and in the second and third centuries the demarcation between heresy and orthodoxy was rather thin or fluid everywhere in the church.
The examples of Jesus gathering crowds and what happened
with the early church are not written in Scripture as examples to be followed for all Christians everywhere.
The argument is that since this is what happened
with the early church, it is what God wants to accomplish in our communities also.
One can not gain even a little acquaintance
with the early church — which means, one can not do even a little reading in the New Testament — without recognizing not only the importance of what the word «Christ» stands for in its life, but also the richness and manifoldness of this same reality.
«It makes them feel more in touch
with the early Church's tumultuous beginnings.
Some of the sayings attributed to Jesus are thought by scholars to have very probably originated
with the early Church and not with Jesus himself.
It reflected the early modern impulse to submit Scripture to reason more than it harmonized
with early church tradition, which regarded a literal six - day creation as unnecessary to Christian orthodoxy.»
Browsing the new arrivals shelf at your local theological library, you're now as likely to find titles by the Catholic dogmatician Matthew Levering, the Orthodox historical theologian Paul Gavrilyuk, and the Reformed theologian Kevin Vanhoozer on why we need to continue to speak,
with the early Church, of God's inability to suffer — and of God's voluntary assumption of our human nature, in Jesus Christ, in order to share, and thereby overcome, our suffering — as you are to find another volume on God's suffering in the divine nature itself.
At that point we moderns simply have to part company
with the early church fathers.»
In the case of the Bible, Textual Criticism, starting
with the early church fathers who were students of the Apostles, the Bible could be pieced together just from their quotations.
Cessationist theology (which believes miracles ended
with the early Church) is almost non-existent outside the Western Church.
Not exact matches
I await confirmation from the researchers at Think Progress, but I suspect that the religious right's obsession
with morays in particular and eels in general, derives not from the canonical Book of Job but from the non-canonical
early church writing, The Epistle of Barnabas, which in verse 10:5 reads:
But in the
early primary state of South Carolina,
with voters scheduled to go to the polls on Saturday and candidates working the state furiously this week, local evangelical pastors are using their influence to rally
church members towards salvation, not electioneering.
Israel and the
early Church are marginal and at odds
with worldly powers.
Unless of course, you agree
with the RCC's response (from your link): «Indeed, the Vatican's
early response to the 2002 revelations of widespread
Church cover - ups of se -LSB--RSB- xual abuse by priests was to declare that gay men should not be ordained.»
Levy, a professor of historical theology at Providence College, overturns the image of a placid medieval
Church and shows instead that the crises of interpretive authority that we associate
with the
early modern period in fact have their roots in the turbulent controversies of the Middle Ages.
«We planned to celebrate the 50th anniversary of our dialogue
with the Lutheran
Church in Germany in late November or
early December,» Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk noted at the time.
Realizing
early on that the Catholic
Church would be ill - served in the coming battles
with secularism without an ability to draw on her own best treasures, Migne devised the scheme of publishing, in uniform format, the entire extant corpus of
early Christian literature, much of which was still in manuscript.
5) the
early years of this country were highly infused
with politics in the
church.
I went to a small town in the midwest to work for a non-profit thinking it'd be like chicken - soup - for the soul... INSTEAD it was a fundamentalist nightmare... it was NOT just small town mindedness... I could hardly find a
church with out people wondering — why is this attractive woman in her
early 30's unwed (or at least divorced
with 3 kids) people were cold and unfathomable judgmental and sometimes downright hostile eager to quote scriptures seemingly un-lead by the Holy Spirit.
In his account, the
Church's attempts to tame violence through preaching humility and peace had a negligible effect on the ancient traditions of manliness until its efforts were joined
with the state's in the
early modern period.
But I know a few evangelical and Pentecostal pastors who'd worry that one in four people in
church on most Sundays wasn't on board with the resurrection, a biblical reality reflected in the teachings of our Lord, of St. Paul, and the early C
church on most Sundays wasn't on board
with the resurrection, a biblical reality reflected in the teachings of our Lord, of St. Paul, and the
early ChurchChurch.
The Vatican's failure occurred despite the establishment of safeguards established four years
earlier to deal
with the growing abuse scandal inside the Catholic
Church, they said.
The late 1980s merger of the old American Lutheran
Church (ALC), Lutheran
Church in America (LCA), and Association of Evangelical Lutheran
Churches (AELC, a much smaller body that broke
earlier with the Lutheran
Church» Missouri Synod) resulted in an organization of 5.3 million members that has been producing red ink, membership losses, and general demoralization since its start.
A major emphasis of Mormonism is that the Mormon
church is the restored
church,
with everything practiced as it was in the
early church.
In disputes
with Jews, Christian thinkers in the
early centuries argued that the promises of return and restoration (in Isaiah, Ezekiel, and the minor prophets) must be interpreted to refer either to the time of the exile in the sixth century B.G.E, i.e., the time of the return from exile in Babylonia, or to the new gathering of humankind in the
church.
But my
early days of questioning the
church were always in the context of seeking «biblical truth» when I found my views in direct conflict
with those expressed in my
church.
«The argument against the authenticity of 2 Peter turns on three main problems: (1) problem of external attestation in the
early church; (2) stylistic and literary problems
with 1 Peter and Jude; and (3) historical and doctrinal problems that seem to indicate internal inconsistency and a late date.
It also places it in continuity
with the experiences of the
early church, and within the continuing narrative of the development of Christian thought — as people have struggled to make sense of and articulate their lived experience of God — which produced the great ecumenical creeds (
with their clear progression of understanding about God, Christ and the Holy Spirit)- and which continues on today.
My wife and have have a retired pastor friend who
early on in his pastoral career,
with the help of several new, young couples challenged the bullies in the
church.
Evangelicals have been blessed
with the recent increase of studies on the
early church fathers.
As the
early Church navigated the tension of «everything is permissible but not everything is beneficial,» we will continue to wrestle
with tensions Austin Powers addressed.
Since my
early days as assistant at my teacher Edmund Schlink's Ecumenical Institute at Heidelberg and afterward during many years of regular ecumenical discussions, especially
with Roman Catholic theologians, I became increasingly aware that Christian theology today should not limit itself to some narrowly defined confessional loyalty inherited from the past but should help to build the foundations of a reunited, if to some degree pluralistic, Christian
church that should become more and more visible within the foreseeable future.
There was a security, love, and wonder I sensed (at an
early age) that only Catholics had ¯ the hushed, steepled
churches and the priests; the parish school
with veiled nuns whose black habits swept the floors; the picture of the pope on the bedroom wall, a strange man
with what looked like an eggshell on his head who gave the sense of a wider world and eternity.
In Ephesians we are presented
with a stark reminder of the
early church's understanding of the power of the risen Christ, who was placed by God «far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in that which is to come.
Perhaps a more thoughtful translation would be for us to understand that Paul did not want believers of the first century partnering
with unbelievers who would impair the work of spreading the «good news» to build the
early church.
I often struggle
with what appear to be misogynistic elements of the Levitical purity codes, of ancient Israeli wartime conduct, of the letters of Paul and the doctrines of the
early church.
Third and fourth reads of the text have proven to be useful in understanding the «downfall» of the
early church; roots of error and departure from NT expectations for a local assembly that have bloomed into flowers
with an unpleasant aroma that must be a stench in the nostrils of God.
How did the
early church do so much
with so little?
Ann Marie worked for CPS at the time, and having recently wed her partner, Patricia (in a
church commitment ceremony at which I served as celebrant), she decided to become a foster co-parent to Hailey, a child
with special needs stemming from the chaos of her life's
earliest months.
In the
early 1520s, Luther's preaching against the power of the Roman Catholic
Church served as a rallying cry, helping give these peasant revolts a higher sense of purpose, and providing them
with a language of spiritual and political critique.
Wright begins
with a painfully short analysis of the
early church and the assembling of the canon, noting that the emergence of Gnosticism and other heresies led to an emphasis among
early Christians on the historical nature of the
church as rooted in the Jewish story, stressing «the continuity from Jesus» day to their own, and indeed on the continuity of the people of Abraham, transformed through Jesus the Messiah but still obedient to the same world - transforming call.»
the reminder that Orthodox theology continually refreshes its thinking by reference to the
early Church Fathers, who were much concerned
with the question of God's activity in the other sects and traditions and in the wisdom of humankind.
In the
Churches of the Reformation the immediate result was, undeniably, an outburst of religious spontaneity such as marks periods of expansion and revival, comparable
with prophetic movements in the
early Church and in the history of
In the United States, where the
Church experienced a particular problem
with clerical abuse scandals during the 90s and
early 00s, their Bishops Conference commissioned a Report on the causes and nature of clerical abuse by the John Jay Institute, an independent legal research group, called the John Jay Report.
This is what members of the
early church were wrestling
with when Peter and Paul wrote their household codes.
Four years
earlier the other two households had left, angry
with each other and the
church over a vote at a session meeting.
It is my sense that Paul was warning the
early church not to be «yoked»
with folks who didn't allow God to make a real difference in their lives — inside and out.