I do hope to persuade you that you need to learn a bit more about it if you want to deal effectively
with economic liberals.
Not exact matches
In contrast to the new U.S. administration, Canada's
Liberal government has remained positive on free trade,
with prime minister Justin Trudeau and various members of his cabinet touting the
economic growth it creates and suggesting the country could benefit from its continued openness to global commerce.
Striking a balance
with China — an important
economic partner, but also a potential rival on other fronts — is unquestionably a fraught process, and veteran China watchers are concerned the
Liberal government hasn't shown sufficient backbone.
The federal
Liberal government is trying to forge deeper
economic ties
with China, notably through exploratory talks on a free - trade agreement.
A former
economic adviser in the George W. Bush administration wants to place a bet
with two
liberal economists over the GOP tax plan.
He has worked
with Canadian politicians and policymakers of all political stripes to craft more effective public policy, including his most recent role as an outside
economic adviser to
Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau.
«The government has been in office long enough to have a clear plan to deal
with the current
economic situation, but the sense of urgency from the Trudeau
Liberals has been completely absent,» Ambrose said in a statement.
In a surprising interview
with the small
liberal magazine the American Prospect, White House chief strategist Steve Bannon said there is «no military solution» to North Korea, declared that «ethnonationalists» like those who rallied in Charlottesville, Virginia, were «losers,» and threatened an «
economic war» against China.
During the second half of the 1990s, the
Liberal government was «blessed»
with ever growing surpluses, largely because of rapid global
economic growth, especially from the United States.
A settlement finalized this week between the B.C.
Liberal government and Boss Power will hit taxpayers
with a $ 30 million bill, serving as a stark reminder of how costly
Liberal economic mismanagement has been for taxpayers.
«Even though Premier Clark and the B.C.
Liberals are completely pre-occupied
with LNG to the exclusion of other important
economic sectors, they are failing to do what's needed to ensure responsible development of B.C.'s LNG potential,» said New Democrat Leader John Horgan.
«The tax plan is just the latest in a long line of really bad
economic policies that are based on an idea of how corporations work that has nothing to do
with how corporations actually work today,» Nell Abernathy, vice president of research and policy at the
liberal - leaning think tank the Roosevelt Institute, told me.
The
Liberals embraced the recommendations of many economists, including ourselves, that
with a sustainable fiscal situation, they could strengthen long - term
economic growth by undertaking infrastructure spending financed by borrowing at historically low interest rates.
As President Donald Trump's recent $ 60 billion - a-year trade tariffs against China have made abundantly clear, there has been growing discontent in the United States
with Beijing's failure to conform to
liberal economic and democratic norms.
If those guys are largely right about the incentive factors that would then come into play (and especially if Americans were moderating their
economic libertarianism
with devotion to family, virtue, community, and God, as your work would urge them to), then by no means would that cause the social welfare policy disaster most
liberals assume it would.
Wolin has described how the
liberal discontent
with all forms of political authority led to a fascination
with the idea that
economic society could be a «self - adjusting order,» a «network of activities carried on by actors who knew no principle of authority.»
Whereas challenges to biblical faith, world war, the decline of conventional morality,
economic depression, and growing expectation of another great war undermined
liberal optimism, that scenario made the dispensationalist interpretation of scripture,
with its predictions of a downward spiral preceding the second coming of Christ, increasingly plausible.
Adam Smith, the founder of classical
liberal economic theory, was also deeply concerned
with morality.
Other
liberals said that love must be expressed directly in all social struggles, but
with the effective means at hand, whether political,
economic, or even military which may be necessary in an imperfect world.
Both
liberals and conservatives want to recover a balance of freedom and solidarity,
with liberals emphasizing lifestyle freedom while wanting to recover
economic solidarity, and conservatives pushing
economic freedom while urging cultural solidarity.
Liberals have long hoped for the moment when the Catholic Church stops being «anti-modern,» which doesn't mean engaged
with science, philosophically sophisticated, and capable of formulating a vision for modern political and
economic life — the Church does all that — but instead means adopting
liberal attitudes toward moral truth.
Economic liberals argue that the state should not interfere with the economic activities of citizens as this constitutes an impingement on their
Economic liberals argue that the state should not interfere
with the
economic activities of citizens as this constitutes an impingement on their
economic activities of citizens as this constitutes an impingement on their liberty.
His first book, «The
Liberal Party and the Economy, 1929 - 1964» (Oxford, 2015) explored how British
Liberals engaged
with economic thought in the era of John Maynard Keynes and William Beveridge.
Despite Nick Clegg's suggestion that he is the «heir to Thatcher» in the run - up to the May 2010 General Election, the
Liberal Democrats went into the election
with a broadly similar
economic policy to Labour's.
Colm: I fear you are allowing your (and my) disagreements
with the classical
liberal / libertarian right on social and
economic policy to get in the way of the possibility of useful discussion of civil liberties issues.
The team also debate whether democracies can grapple
with complex
economic problems; plus first - past - the - post in multi-party elections, the fate of the
Liberal Democrats, and in light of this week's election result in Finland, our tendency to idolise Nordic politics.
Moreover, individualized notions of rights rooted «
liberal» values are claimed to be incompatible
with Ugandan political epistemologies and counterproductive to combatting wider social and
economic inequalities.
The responsibility for the crisis is identified in turn
with Berlusconi and his failure to deliver on the
liberal revolution he repeatedly promised;
with the Democratic Party which many saw as hopeless during the long years in opposition; and finally,
with Mario Monti, whose technocratic government some perceive as the product of the
economic establishment which created the crisis and is now passing the costs on to the middle class.
With Labour effectively mute, the
Liberal Democrats diminished and Ukip still frighteningly appealing, we lack clear strong voices in favour of
economic pragmatism.
The party's leftist, post-material and socially
liberal stance is well - known, and emphasises policies such as opposition to
economic austerity and to PFIs to fund public services; higher marginal rates of income tax for the wealthy; a «living wage» for all; and the replacement of VAT
with «eco-taxes» such as aviation fuel tax.
On
economic issues,
liberal Democrats vary,
with some supporting neo-
liberal economics while others support Keynesian economics or a mixed
economic system.
«As you know Labour are now in formal talks
with the
Liberal Democrats to see if we can agree a stable government to secure the
economic recovery and change our politics,» the letter, signed by the joint general secretaries Tony Woodley and Derek Simpson, said.
Liberal Democrats
economic affairs spokesman Vince Cable said # 11 billion of the total loan was completely unsecured
with the remainder offered on more «relaxed standards» than usual.
What is the most appropriate response from
Liberal Democrat representatives at their Party's annual conference to an invitation to endorse and to continue
with the Conservative's
economic strategy?
With no new money committed to capital spending over that announced in March's Budget, however, the Social
Liberal Forum is concerned that further cuts to current spending in the Chancellor's Spending Review are unlikely to repair public finances in the absence of robust
economic recovery.
Blair and Mandelson know that their political project — to eliminate trade union and rank and file influence from the Labour Party and move it towards coalition
with the
Liberals — and the government's
economic policies, notably the goal of cutting social spending, will collide
with successive layers of the labour movement.
Are these
Liberal Democrats «okay»
with making some of the most vulnerable people in our society pay for the
economic mess caused by millionaire bankers?
That must start
with the coherent
economic strategy, independent of George Osborne, that
Liberal Democrats but not their leadership wanted to see debated in March.
But he seized the opportunity of forming a coalition
with the
Liberal Democrats to provide
economic stability and to achieve and deliver a lot of Conservative policies under the Coalition Agreement.
The
Liberal Democrats have an opportunity, at their annual conference, to make their dissatisfaction
with George Osborne's self - defeating austerity plain, regain some of their Party's political integrity, give real momentum to a more intelligent
economic strategy and help to restore a modicum of intellectual coherence to the Party's approach to
economic policy - making.
He is campaigning on his pragmatic approach that has coupled tax cuts and upstate
economic development initiatives
with liberal victories like gun control and same - sex marriage.
He has further explained that his often - expressed view that British
liberals should «reclaim our
economic liberal heritage» 4 has been «misunderstood and misrepresented, as implying a downgraded commitment to the party's social
liberal roots... The argument is that social
liberal goals should be pursued
with economically
liberal means.»
Founded by a merger of the Social Democratic Party and the
Liberal Party, the party can be simplistically labelled as a mixture of
economic liberalism and social liberalism, and it has become fashionable to insist that while the party could sit comfortably
with such differences when in opposition, it is much trickier when in government, particularly as a minority party.
The party was widely perceived to be lacking strong leadership and
economic credibility, which it assumed it could overcome
with a «35 % strategy» of holding onto its core vote from 2010 and grafting on some
Liberal Democrat defectors.
He was elected in 2010 as a «new Democrat» who married centrist
economic policies — a cap on property tax increases, business tax cuts, a reduction in pension benefits for new public employees —
with liberal social policies like strict gun control and support for same - sex marriage.
In a joint press conference
with Liberal Democrat Chris Huhne, the Tory chairman branded Labour's
economic performance «criminal» and pinned the blame for the deficit reduction plan squarely on the shoulders of the opposition.
The debate opens
with an amendment put forward by the Social
Liberal Forum (SLF), a left - wing pressure group, for a change of
economic policy.
Liam Byrne speaks for the fifty percent who support
liberal interventionism, want to retain an independent nuclear deterrent, think it's vital Labour has a credible
economic policy, and think it's equally vital Labour builds a good relationship
with business.
The extent of the discomfort
with the government's
economic plans was laid bare even further when a group of
Liberal Democrat councillors wrote a letter criticising the spending cuts programme in the strongest possible terms.
«As New Yorkers are faced
with a punishing
economic climate fueled by Gov. Cuomo's special interest donors and
liberal career politicians, Congressman Gibson's announcement of an exploratory committee for governor is a light at the end of the tunnel,» said Nojay, a conservative lawmaker from the Rochester area and a talk - radio host.