It's not much of a thinker, and Damon's a bland choice for the lead role, but director Doug Liman injects
it with enough pace to keep things entertaining.
A movie for kids of all ages,
with enough pace and effects to amuse the youngsters and humour plus message to engage adults.
Monreal (who should be asked to be cautious as he ventures forward) and hopefully with his defensive bias, should be able to track back and help out in the defense when we are short at the back, and OX on the right side who, from evidence of his having played there and performed in the shortness of this season games, and
with enough pace to track back when necessary — but with a bias for going forward — would be a good mix to start with.
I think we didn't counter
with enough pace and intensity.
psg showed that
with enough pace u can beat the likes of Bayern and Barcelona but our wenger might not have reasoned on that base... we need lucas sanchez welbeck upfront... welbeck wud totally run alaba down and lucas wud keep lahm busy preventing them from launching at us... asides that... hmmmm
Not exact matches
«The problem is that employers have not created nearly
enough jobs in Canada to keep
pace with population growth,» he said.
Because of the fast -
paced nature of the startup environment, it can be very easily for a manager to fall into the trap of thinking that he or she doesn't have
enough time to handle new employees
with extra care.
As a group, the global MNCs were not bold
enough: They were delivering growth but not investing fast
enough to keep
pace with local competition in developing markets.
We continually reach out to our many constituencies to ensure that our governance profile is dynamic and robust
enough to keep
pace with the ever - changing world in which we operate.
While investors are often concerned about catastrophic risks, failing to allocate
enough to risky assets can lead investors to «fail slowly» by not maintaining
pace with inflation or supporting withdrawal rates.
«In areas where homebuilding has severely lagged job creation in recent years, it's going to be a slow slog before there's
enough new construction to cool price appreciation to a
pace that aligns more closely
with incomes.»
, leaving the metro unable to build fast
enough to keep
pace with the 11,625 additional new jobs projected each year as a result of Amazon.
Baltimore is the seventh hardest metro in which to build, leaving the metro unable to build fast
enough to keep
pace with the 11,625 additional new jobs projected each year as a result of Amazon.
Indeed, last November, Augur co-founder Joey Krug shared his frustrations
with the sluggish
pace of Ethereum's development in this area, tweeting that it «really needs more developers... there simply aren't
enough.»
Economic health is sound
enough for the market to expect the Fed to continue
with its measured
pace of rate increases.
It is quite possible for nominal wages to grow at a
pace which is consistent
with meeting the inflation objective, but still fast
enough to close off opportunities for strong employment growth.
While he shares his Blue Chip colleague's concerns
with capital preservation, he needs his portfolio to generate reliable income through a longer retirement, while producing
enough growth to keep
pace with inflation.
Some new church buildings were erected, but not
enough to keep
pace with the increase in population.
Weissman preserves her artfully -
paced narrative by placing the in - depth background information at the back of the book or in boxes, but still provides
enough detail in the main text to clearly explain to readers unfamiliar
with the coffee trade and the stakes involved.
My guess is we won't see much of the ball so will need to try to nullify their threat
with El Neny / Coq whilst having
pace enough up front for the counter.
Arteta, flamini, diaby, campbell, rosicky, podolski should go, and people will kill this but do u feel Walcott is good
enough do nt be english bias like i do nt think he is because he is one dimensional he cant beat a player
with shit loads of
pace imagine if Walcott had Sanchez skill along
with his goals and impressive movement he would be deadly and unstoppable and he just isn't and i know gnarby will be that people will disagree but the kid is good and above all determined like sanchez he will be a world class in due time ox too but he is often too injured and welbeck lol headless chicken
I felt that we had possession 70 per cent of the time and we lacked a bit of accuracy
with our final ball, a change of
pace or have
enough men forward.
Instead of moving players out of position to accommodate a new arrival how about applying some tactical nous and allowing two talented players to both play as strikers.The best teams of 1998 - 2004 had a number of different strikers playing off the genius of Dennis Bergkamp.We had
pace, movement and power.Although I would not put Ozil in Bergkamps class he is talented
enough to pull the strings
with other playmakers such as Jack and Mikki in the side in a 442.
The tempo of the game favored Denver, who plays at the NBA's fastest
pace, but it remains to be seen whether they'll have
enough firepower to trade baskets
with Oklahoma City over four quarters.
only have one NHL player
with them, and, though Andrei Markov is no slouch, it hasn't been quite
enough to keep
pace.
Even though he doesn't have
enough pace as we would have loved, he compensates for his lack of
pace with his good reading of the game to know when to make last ditch tackles and timely interceptions....
That was my biggest bitch about yesterday; a LOT of passes went to a Thorn who was standing still, and a lot of them had
enough pace that the receiver couldn't immediately turn on the ball but had to take a touch to control it — that's what happened to Horan
with the Nairn steal; she was stationary, facing downfield, and had to settle the ball just long
enough to let Nairn (who had read the play WAY early, since Sonnett telegraphed her pass like she used a high - lighter on it...) step through Horan and take.
I just hope that does nt mean our midfielders give very little protection otherwise we will have a problem... only Debuchy Chambers or Monreal starting might not be the problem as it could be Mert... or it could be a slight lack of
pace out wide
with Chambers... or not
enough experience in Bellerin.
Basically thierry was saying that the whole spine of the team needed strengthening, ok he stressed a striker but that could have been that our goal scorers
with pace are not good
enough, ie welbeck or sanchez.
we created more chances, there just wasn't
enough pace and width
with Santi on the left.
And I am not saying Mertesacker is not good
enough, but try pairing Kos and Gabriel and let's see how it works, those two have
pace, tenacity, can tackle and will be great against pacy strikers and not let Kos be the one making the run for two people
with that, you risk your best defender being injured.
Futhermore, theo is different frm all our attackers, he gives us something diffrnt, he has rarely played this season yet he has scored as many as our «hardworking ox» has scored all season, he assists more than any other winger in epl, the keep talk shit abt theo tracking back, the fact is, theo doesn't need to track back, when he plays, opposing fullbacks rarely push up field becus they are scared of his
pace, so that leaves our fullback one on one
with their winger, now, does our fullback need help frm theo to mark his man??? Only if that winger is Messi, Ronaldo or Robben, if they not either of those three and our fullback can not handle them, then he is not good
enough for arsenal!
Unlucky my Ar:: s we just ain't good
enough with the big boys he bought, Sanches is like Walcott lot of
pace but no skill, he plays like a schoolboy in the play ground head down and chace back.
The thing
with Joel is as much as he works hard winning the ball, his contribution going forward is not so good plus it seems he doesn't have
enough pace or trickery to go past players.
• 09 Podolski — Under used, best left foot in the squad, no good at chasing back • 10 Wilshere — Falls over a lot, injury prone, runs down blind alleys, spends more time sitting on his arse waving his arms around than influencing the game • 14 Walcott — Quick, can change games
with his
pace, improved his finishing, can't wait for him to be back to full fitness • 22 Sanogo — Looooooooool, that is all • 26 Martinez — Haven't seen
enough of him to truly judge.
He will not venture high up the pitch because his slow running back acceleration and poor long distance
pace will let him down, he most often pass the ball long and too quickly, this is also a problem for arsenal in a sense that he does not come out
with the ball and allow his players
enough time to take up better position.
I can not see Ozil as MOTM... yes @ assists, 1st was corner... obviously if he's the one taking the corner there more of a chance of him getting the assisrt if we score... apart from that, the guy doesn't work hard
enough for the team and
with him not tracking back, you'd exepect him to have the «Messi effect» (random burst of
pace — due to reserved energy)-- yet Ozil seems sluggish.
Wenger is just not doing
enough to keep
pace with the other big EPL clubs or many other UEFA CL clubs.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen
pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach
pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score
enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played
with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent
with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely
enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Having said that,
with Lukaku out to silence his detractors after a poor display against Liverpool, coupled
with the threat and
pace of Rashford and Anthony Martial on the wings on the counter, the Red Devils should have
enough to return to Manchester
with all three points.
Lacazette always looks dangerous when he gets the ball, but
with the strength and
pace of EPL defenders he doesn't get much time on the ball as our opponents have learned his style of play, but Wenger thinks that he still does
enough for the team even though he can't seem to score any more.
I can't stand welbeck for one reason he's not better than what we have but if you played a front two of welbeck and Sanchez then Cambpell left and Walcott or chaimbo right that would give us a huge counter attacking style
with lots of skill and
pace, but here is the problem to do this you need big strong DM to win the ball back when we defend and we do t have them, flaming is reckless and getting old, Arteta is good on the Bala but not quick or strong
enough, please don't say Diaby as we all know he will be inj soon again, then also what to do
with Ozil and Corzola?
If we sign someone to play on the wing, I want a true winger
with pace that stays wide mostly, or at least stays wide often
enough to make fullbacks cover the wide spaces.
They almost got through on Szczesny straight away but our defenders were having none of that and snuffed out the danger — and we nearly got a third goal
with a quick counter but Alexis» fearsome
pace and drive were not quite
enough.
Chelsea play counter attacking football and bellrin has more than
enough pace to keep up
with any of the chelsea players!
On the flanks, he lacks the necessary
pace to keep up
with opposing players, and he doesn't quite look nimble
enough for the role.
yes, and i do not see him fit
enough no for premier... but akpom, wow, is 100 times better that sanogo, strong, fast,
with pace.
I think this line - up has more than
enough going forward to cause the West London mob problems at the back, but have reservations about our defence coping
with the
pace and guile our opponents possess.
Oxlade - Chamberlain completes the front three
with Alexis Sanchez and Olivier Giroud, giving us plenty of
pace, power and hopefully more than
enough quality to put the visitors to the sword.
Danny Welbeck is fit
enough for the bench and I would have expected him to start but Wenger has gone for Ozil in the wide forward role,
with Cazorla in the number 10 position, so
with Alexis on the other side of the in form Giroud, there is plenty of
pace and guile in our attack and
with Liverpool having to replace the suspended Skrtel
with the former Gunner Kolo Toure, we should give them plenty of problems.