Sentences with phrase «with environmental attacks»

This vice president, who did not want his name to appear in print, was deeply concerned about coal's future and expressed frustration with environmental attacks on coal, suggesting that it was all a problem of perception: «People don't like coal because it's black,» he told me.

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

She says the government agency gives practical advice on modern crises such as cyber - or terror attacks, pandemic or environmental threats, along with conventional warfare.

Environmental group Friends of the Earth (FoE) has attacked the plans after a climate change amendment - which would have created a statutory requirement to consider climate change when approving major infrastructure projects - was defeated by 15 votes (with 24 Labour MPs rebelling).

They document the association's response to attacks on scientists during the McCarthy era, concerns with civil defense, the Vietnam war, and environmental degredation.

Inhofe attacks «environmental agenda» These messages don't sit well with conservatives who say that a focus on climate change detracts from efforts to contain terrorism and siphons away needed resources.

He suspects it was a balance between prey detection, competition with other sharks and environmental conditions that allow them to launch a quick vertical attack where the water is clear enough to see the seals.

In a May ruling, the 2nd U.S Circuit Court of Appeals in New York said the attacks were an act of war, exempting defendants of liability under a law enacted in 1980 to deal with environmental and health risks caused by industrial pollution.

From a climate policy perspective, the bill can be seen as part of the Conservative ongoing effort to 1) gut environmental assessments and scientific research; 2) attack ENGOs that disagree with government policy to promote unfettered development of the oil sands; and 3) to sideline and even eliminate inconvenient advisory bodies like the National Roundtable on Energy and the Environment.

As if cancer wasn't challenging to begin with, secondary attacks on the immune system from environmental pathogenic influences, such as viruses and bacteria, make the immune system particularly vulnerable in those already experiencing oncological issues.

Combining hormone balancing with correction of other environmental and lifestyle factors is our best hope for reducing the present risks of breast cancer, strokes and heart attacks.

Although it sometimes goes unnoticed, when faced with allergens or environmental pollutants, the symptoms can suddenly worsen and set off an asthma attack.

At odds with the Kung Fu - style combat are the brutal environmental attacks, some of which had me cringe in pain as an enemy was jammed head first into an exhaust fan or impaled on a meat hook.

Even the basics of combat are getting a bit of a refresher, with new environmental attacks and something called the «State Combo» system, which sounds like it offers more dynamic combos that vary based on where your enemies are and what they're doing.

In half seriousness, I wonder why European automakers have never tried to attack the diesel stigma head on in their advertising in an effort to make the trademark clatter synonymous with environmental and social awareness.

These environmental controls attack allergens where they lurk, letting allergy sufferers «peacefully co-exist» with their pets, and many household allergen collectors such as carpets, upholstered furniture and cloth drapes.

Attacks had to be timed correctly and matched to the different enemy types that make up the large groups that you've got to deal with, and the environmental attacks were awesome to Attacks had to be timed correctly and matched to the different enemy types that make up the large groups that you've got to deal with, and the environmental attacks were awesome to attacks were awesome to behold.

There is, however, a slight touch of imprecision when using a controller which could be improved upon with some updating, but overall control is great and there's a palpable sense of weight behind attacks and movement, bolstered by the fact that the game has a moderate level of environmental destruction.

As you progress through a crumbling stone building, you learn the basics of attacking, dodging, talking with other characters, solving environmental puzzles and taking on the game's massive bosses.

Any news on a follow up to MK 9 with air combos, environmental attacks such as kicking sand or throwing torches, and perhaps a whole new cast of kharakters with mercy endings.

Gameplay is fairly standard for side - scrolling shooters, with predictable patterns of attack from the enemy ships and a few environmental obstacles thrown in.

Jam packed with all the usual blood wrenching horror that we have come to expect, this once again reborn game offers environmental attacks, 2 new character

Geoengineering has been attacked by some environmentalists as creating a possible end run around the need for curbing emissions of greenhouse gases at the source, and also for coming with its own basket of potential environmental consequences.

There is «empirical evidence» but it's identified by skeptics despite efforts by government funded agencies and environmental groups to block, deny, and discredit with personal attacks.

Consider in this regard the deeply deceptive recent WSJ op - ed by David B. Rivkin Jr., who writes for the National Review and is a principal attorney in the fossil fuel industry attacks on the Environmental Protection Agency clean power plan, and Andrew M. Grossman, who represents the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), an organization with long - established ties to both the fossil fuel industry and the tobacco industry before it, including its ongoing affiliation with Chris Horner, the very lawyer Alpha was funding to attack climate scientists.

attack the science with science, go for the established scientists who promote a political agenda, go for the religious but don't lump all environmentalists or even all environmental laws together just because they care or want to protect the environment.

On March 6, 2014, the Berman - run Environmental Policy Alliance ran a full - page ad in the Wall Street Journal attacking Food & Water Watch, the Sierra Club, and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) as «big green radicals» and announced its new website, BigGreenRadicals.com [64] Food & Water Watch responded with a blog post saying:

To help the public assess these attacks against this miracle material, let's consider what leading environmental thinkers have to say about issues EDN raised on Earth Day, beginning with its use of the term «Plastic Pollution.»

Since «Fakegate» occurred, ThinkProgress, Greenpeace, 350.org, and other radical environmental groups have been using the stolen and fake documents to attack Heartland's corporate donors and the scientists who work with it.

Bob Keefe of the National Resources Defense Council described it as an assault, «With Washington and the world focused on the debt ceiling drama, hard - right House Republicans have launched the biggest congressional assault on the environment in history, attacking our fundamental environmental and public health protections in order to appease Tea Party ideologues and big business donors.»

There's more sizable problems with Niose's «Fighting Back the Right: Reclaiming America from the Attack on Reason» book when it comes to its source on the notion of industry «influencing climate and environmental policy», Steve Coll, and how the source cascades back to Ross Gelbspan.

Mike Enzi confuses climate with weather (he's not alone in that sort of ridiculous bluster, of course), and John Barrasso has a long list of attacks on the Environmental Protection Agency and the science of climate change.

Dr. Lovelock, honored in 1997 with the Blue Planet Prize, which is widely considered the environmental equivalent of a Nobel award, has now come under attack from some environmentalists for his support of nuclear power as a way to avoid runaway «global heating» — his preferred alternative to «global warming.»

Direct and indirect cultural and physical genocidal strategies carried out against Indigenous peoples have greatly contributed to the environmental crisis we now face paralleled with epidemic rates of sexual violence, addiction, and attacks against Native girls» and women's sanctity, bodies, communities, and lands.