Sentences with phrase «with evidence in that case»

In large part because of the approach he adopted, the arbitrator's decision is inconsistent with the evidence in this case.

Not exact matches

While most of us think that making decisions rationally — with piles of statistics and numbers and other evidence to back us up — is the best way to go, in reality, this is often not the case.

In this case, the black - and - white evidence against the cartel was revealed in the form of damaging email communications which included statements such as «with a bit of talking and cooperation between us, we all win!&raquIn this case, the black - and - white evidence against the cartel was revealed in the form of damaging email communications which included statements such as «with a bit of talking and cooperation between us, we all win!&raquin the form of damaging email communications which included statements such as «with a bit of talking and cooperation between us, we all win!»

«This case has already been dismissed with prejudice by the court that heard it, which ruled in Yelp's favor and also found the claims not to be supported by credible evidence,» Vince Sollitto, Yelp's vice president of communications said.

There's a whole process that's set up to ensure that the jury that finally gets impaneled is an objective group of people with no connection with anything going on in the case that might persuade them to cast a decision that's inconsistent with the evidence that's presented at the trial.

In effect, Couric just provided them with some blockbuster evidence that this is in fact the casIn effect, Couric just provided them with some blockbuster evidence that this is in fact the casin fact the case.

But, HBO's The Jinx provided an in - depth look at Durst's odd behavior and quirky personality traits, while also bringing to light crucial new evidence that eventually paved the way for authorities to revive at least one murder case associated with Durst.

But acrimony isn't limited to the founding team, and when things go bad with an investor, it can get ugly pretty quickly as evidenced in the case of ArsDigital.

as to Shares deliverable on the exercise of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, or in settlement of Performance Units or Restricted Stock Units, until the delivery (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of Walmart of a duly authorized transfer agent of Walmart) of such Shares, give the Recipient the right to vote, or receive dividends on, or exercise any other rights as a stockholder with respect to such Shares, notwithstanding the exercise (in the case of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights) of the related Plan Award;

Adaptive learning looks a whole lot like stubborn inflexibility when new information conflicts with very strong «priors» — in this case, a century of evidence that those syndromes were effective on their own.

As cases in federal court and several state courts delve into whether there is evidence that glyphosate causes cancer, a scientist with a consumer...

MSNBC legal analyst Danny Cevallos argues that the weight of the evidence favors the view that the case must be dealt with in arbitration.

I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just as in a court case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no matter how much evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit into their world view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»

nearly imposiible unless it happened the way that is indicated... but in this case, there is no absolute evidence, as we have with the Big Bang, so the correct term is likely.

In the case of creationism, for example, scientific evidence now exists which contradicts directly with the creation myth (unless one thinks of the creation story as being an allegory or something like that).

In many cases, the Bible can not be used at all, only physical evidence along with thought - provoking questions that hopefully leads a person to a right conclusion.

In any case, worry less about who people are and more about the fact that all you have are a lot of personal feelings and beliefs you can't support with objective evidence.

In some cases, evidence of past incorrect opinion is sufficient: The CEO of the software firm Mozilla, Brendan Eich, was hounded from his post in 2014 for a $ 1,000 contribution to a 2008 California referendum campaign against gay marriage, evidence of a position he shared at the time with Barack Obama and Hillary ClintoIn some cases, evidence of past incorrect opinion is sufficient: The CEO of the software firm Mozilla, Brendan Eich, was hounded from his post in 2014 for a $ 1,000 contribution to a 2008 California referendum campaign against gay marriage, evidence of a position he shared at the time with Barack Obama and Hillary Clintoin 2014 for a $ 1,000 contribution to a 2008 California referendum campaign against gay marriage, evidence of a position he shared at the time with Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

I do nt usually argue with fellow believers, but in this case I would point out that there is no scriptural evidence that Adam changed physically as a result of the fall (by adding genitalia)

So in other words all you have is the bible and nothing more because if have actual evidence, you'd be the first and you should be sharing it with the world, unless of course what you consider evidence is simply your own personal stories in which case it is only evidence to you and does not pertain outside of your small mind.

It's more like a hypothesis, an idea or proposition with little or no evidence to support it (in this case none).

One can lay out all the evidence and build (and have built) an airtight case against every single religion on Earth past and present, but still believers will not budge from their point of view, even when presented with the lies and contradictions in the very scriptures they they base their beliefs on.

In the nature of the case the evidence needed for reasoned proof on empirical grounds is not accessible, and we had better frankly admit that our faith in immortality is a faith, coherent with what we know of God and his ways with men, and not a conclusion from scientific evidencIn the nature of the case the evidence needed for reasoned proof on empirical grounds is not accessible, and we had better frankly admit that our faith in immortality is a faith, coherent with what we know of God and his ways with men, and not a conclusion from scientific evidencin immortality is a faith, coherent with what we know of God and his ways with men, and not a conclusion from scientific evidence.

Dodd's whole thesis with regard to a kerygmatic chronology fails for lack of the confirming evidence required to establish a position which would reverse the course of scholarship, and thus must move against the stream of current views as to the probabilities in the case.

In the case of Moore, where the circumstantial evidence is much stronger and to me relatively persuasive, Wilson himself writes: «Nobody would ever quite know, truly know, what he had shared with [Moore] in those early days.&raquIn the case of Moore, where the circumstantial evidence is much stronger and to me relatively persuasive, Wilson himself writes: «Nobody would ever quite know, truly know, what he had shared with [Moore] in those early days.&raquin those early days.»

In fact, there is a case for saying that the zeal with which ID is attacked by materialist scientists and philosophers is, arguably, evidence of its explanatory force and the threat it poses to the materialist orthodoxy.

The first is that Christian denominations that have taken this form of liberalism most to heart are also those that seem to be experiencing a serious crisis of confidence, as evidenced by declining membership, intra-denominational splits over issues like homosexuality, and ¯ in some cases ¯ increasing discomfort with core Christian beliefs about Jesus Christ and the Trinity.

So, show us that there is NO GOD with evidence so we can allow Atheism to lead us into ALL «truth», which in this case... THEY DO N'T HAVE IT.

One can lay out all the evidence and build (and have built) an airtight case against every single religion on Earth past and present, but still believers will not budge from their point of view, even when presented with the lies and contradictions in the very scriptures they base their beliefs on.

That church was caught up in the biblical ambiguity, as chapter 10 has evidenced.19 But, as is the case with Jesus, it is easy to see where the weight falls.

In such a (remarkable, but not - miraculous) case, he could present himself with holes in his hands and feet and in his side, to Thomas, and you and I both know that this «evidence,» which does not prove death and resurrection, still would be convincing to Thomas that Jesus both died and rose from the deaIn such a (remarkable, but not - miraculous) case, he could present himself with holes in his hands and feet and in his side, to Thomas, and you and I both know that this «evidence,» which does not prove death and resurrection, still would be convincing to Thomas that Jesus both died and rose from the deain his hands and feet and in his side, to Thomas, and you and I both know that this «evidence,» which does not prove death and resurrection, still would be convincing to Thomas that Jesus both died and rose from the deain his side, to Thomas, and you and I both know that this «evidence,» which does not prove death and resurrection, still would be convincing to Thomas that Jesus both died and rose from the dead.

The Home Office told Premier it did not «routinely comment on individual cases» but «each application is considered on its individual merits based on the evidence provided and in line with the UK's Immigration Rules.»

I shall assume that the aim of an explication of «valid induction» is to find a numerical or comparative function c (h, e)-- the «confirmation of hypothesis h given evidence e» — which is a syntactic function of the statements h and e, and which has a high or comparatively high value in those cases where normally accepted or intuitive inductive methods would direct us to accept hypothesis h on evidence e, at least in comparison with other hypotheses having lower c - value.

I offered evidence that this is not the case whether in the population at large or with regard to women having abortions, who generally do acknowledge their unborn baby's personhood.

Funny how star gazing gives one awe and a sense of eternity and in my case it removes the hope of heaven... i.e. there is no heaven, just space with gazeous substance... a place where it is childish and absurd to think we are going when we die... Our solar system / galaxy seem empty of organic life altogether... actually inorganic seems to be the norm... so my faith struggle of the week is how can I possibly believe in after life... when reality shows me decomposition of all that we are, scientific observation does not allow room for a «spirit body» to rise and go in some nebulae... So why do I still need to believe despite this raw evidence... I drive me crazy sometimes...

With this recent history as context, Kurtis works his way through the cases of Ray Krone (whom DNA evidence proved innocent of the murder of a woman in Chicago) and Thomas Kimball (who was exonerated after a careful vetting of circumstantial evidence).

It was richer also in the way it wove that evidence together with principled reasoning and brought forth a compelling moral case for the law to provide protection for that offspring developing in the womb.

In the case of Harpur's theory (that Jesus didn't exist, and that deliberate efforts have been made to choose to make the myths interpreted literally), his evidence is not as convincing or as extensive as the evidence for Jesus having been a real person, on whom a certain religious and political systems have been formed and which have embellished, perverted, and developed certain aspects, with intentions both deliberate and unintentional.

[para 385] Having said this, a case could be made, on the evidence, that the market of interest was a wholesale market, with the major supermarket chains providing an indirect constraint on the participants in that market.

I will agree that the video evidence in Bennett's case is suspect at best for excessive force, however, I hardly feel bad for the officers involved in the situation give the history that the LVPD has with its patrons.

Souleymane said as much and in case anyone is wondering whether the guy was just not really bothered, he filed a report with the police as soon as he was made aware of the video evidence, demanding punishment for the racists.

Failure to engage with fathers and father figures has been evidenced in research and serious case reviews for decades.

In any case, agencies having contact with children generally do not enquire about the father's PR status, and will usually only do so where there is evidence of substantial conflict with or estrangement from the mother, or major child welfare concerns regarding the father's care of the child.

Not surprisingly, the media feeding frenzy has resulted, anecdotal evidence suggests, in a sharp drop in youth football registrations for this fall's season, with parents fearful that playing football will almost inevitably expose their kid to an unreasonable risk of injury (which, of course, is patently untrue; more than 7 million kids in the U.S. currently play football, very few of whom, statistically speaking and despite a few well - publicized cases - are likely to end up committing suicide because of the hits they sustained playing the sport, and millions upon countless millions who have played football over the past century without apparent ill effect).

Arming yourself with the appropriate, evidence - based information is important in this case so you can be prepared for what is to come.

«There's some evidence that kids with ADHD crave carbohydrates, particularly refined or simple carbs such as sugar and fruit, and in a small percentage of cases, eating these foods does seem to make the symptoms worse,» says Lynn.

In case you needed proof that homebirth advocacy is «evidence resistant,» homebirth advocates charmingly demonstrate that they work backward from their chosen conclusion and don't even feel it necessary to actually read what they are disagreeing with.

After more than a decade (ending in 2011) of working with the Alaska Division of Public Health tracking local SIDS and sleep - related death cases, we were unable to find evidence that co-sleeping increased the risk of death when controlling for other factors.

And, when not given answers by some, going to those who ARE willing to back up their answers with evidence, even if it later turns out to have been not evidence at all, as in the case of some claims by some midwives or many claims by many midwives, or whatever it is.

In addition, women carrying their own case notes may be slightly more satisfied with antenatal care (low - certainty evidence).