True explanations don't «line up»
with false explanations.
Not exact matches
Rather than go
with the same old
explanation offered by the religious that has proven itself
false in the past?
I wonder if «spiritual but not religious» is a bit of a cultural transitional stage in which it is becoming clear that formal religious dogma is at best intellectually unsatisfying, and at worst not only
false but dangerous; and yet we don't really know what to do
with that part of our brain that seeks magical
explanations for what we can not easily understand.
The article included eight statements about the new test,
with each immediately identified as fact or myth, and
with an
explanation of why the items were true or
false.
• Visual and simple
explanation pages of similes, metaphors and alliteration
with a short true or
false task.
Neither legislator's staff has responded
with any sort of
explanation for their bosses»
false statements.
The best probable
explanation I can come up
with is that the «
false start» you described caused a drop or spike in voltage (or even removed voltage from the supply line, depending on what you did
with the ignition key) right at the point that the airbag controller was powering up and performing its self - diagnostic.
Here are 6 True or
False questions that relate to food allergies,
with the answers and
explanations following.
As
with all purported
explanations of the greenhouse effect, the paper is pointless, being based on demonstrably
false assumptions.
You seem to be trying to make some sort of
false equivalence
with or alternative
explanation for modern warming.
Not saying the science is
false — but it would be good to see a good
explanation of the radiation physics
with actual numbers, etc — not a dumbed down «the IR bounces off the CO2 and goes back down to warm the earth» presentation.
Essentially if a hypothesis test fails to reject the null hypothesis there are essentially two
explanations: (i) it wasn't rejected because it is true or (ii) the null hypothesis is
false but there isn't enough data to determine
with high confidence that it is
false.
The combination of apophenia (the tendency to see patterns in random data), confirmation bias (the tendency to focus on evidence that is in line
with our expectations or favoured
explanation) and hindsight bias (the tendency to see an event as having been predictable only after it has occurred) can easily lead us to
false conclusions,
With no way to provide an
explanation to a jury as to why the accused would confess if they were in fact innocent, that
false confession can be the most powerful piece of evidence, and sometimes the only real piece of evidence, against them that can take their life away from them.
So we're going to take 10 minutes, speak to your client and see if we can come up
with some
explanation or something, because you know, worst case scenario, she's sworn a
false affidavit.