They have assembled a collection of odd bedfellows — the major teachers unions, which have never been happy
with federal testing requirements; civil rights groups; and, interestingly, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
In April, the USDE placed Illinois in what the agency calls «high - risk status» for not complying
with federal testing requirements, according to correspondence provided to the Tribune Friday by the Illinois State Board of Education.
The findings are noteworthy, researchers said, because they come as states are gearing up to comply
with the federal testing requirements outlined in the No Child Left Behind Act.
Not exact matches
Aside from explaining the legislation to others, Wood and his colleagues were charged
with bridging the gap between Tennessee's current standards - based
testing requirements and those of the
federal government.
That is a sharp break
with the U.S. where
federal grants and loans are provided without regard to
test scores or grades, although some programs offered by states and universities often include a merit
requirement.
In the first five years of the
federal No Child Left Behind Act, much attention has been focused on implementation issues — from how to manage the increasing number of schools and districts «in need of improvement» or in «corrective action,» to problems
with testing programs, adequate - yearly - progress reporting, and the law's highly - qualified - teacher
requirements.
Despite widespread media coverage of the opt out movement and significant retreats last year in
federal education policy, the public remains solidly behind mandatory
testing,
with 80 percent favoring a
federal requirement for annual
testing.
This evidence, along
with a new
federal requirement that state accountability systems include an indicator of school quality or student success not based on
test scores, has sparked interest in incorporating such «non-cognitive» or «social - emotional» skills into school accountability systems.
A solid 67 % of members of the public say they support continuing the
federal requirement for annual
testing, while just 21 % oppose the idea,
with the remainder taking a neutral position.
Just days before a deadline this month mandated by Congress, the Department of Education signed binding compliance agreements
with several states that lag far behind in meeting
federal requirements on standards and
testing dating back to 1994.
DPI also is required to ask the U.S. Department of Education for a waiver from
federal requirements that mandate one
test be given to all students, in order to provide schools
with options of
tests.
This could be accomplished
with one 45 - minute
test in each area in order to meet the
federal requirement.
None of the schools in her district met the
federal requirement for participating in state exams,
with only about half of middle school students taking the
tests at Washburne School.
Yes, there will be more money under a Bush or other proposal (until tax cuts and military spending increases and economic slowdown intervene), but this
federal money will be wholly inadequate for needed improvements while saddling states, districts, schools, and their students
with massive
testing requirements.
The series examines work in an atmosphere partially dictated by numerous
federal programs
with different
requirements, where educators have a strong say in leading their profession and student success is measured beyond
test scores.
Heavier sanctions required for schools that do not boost
test scores have previously been shown to be counter-productive; • The
requirement that limited English proficient students score «proficient» on English exams is self - contradictory, as is the provision that most children
with special needs demonstrate competency in the same manner as other students; • Education is being damaged as students are coached to pass
tests rather than taught a rich curriculum that will help prepare them for life in the 21st Century; and • The
federal government has failed to adequately fund the law.
With increased
requirements for
federal and state
testing, schools are integrating more and more
test preparation into their schedules.
SALT LAKE CITY — Utah's final plan to comply
with the
federal Every Student Succeeds Act comes
with one caveat — a request to opt out of student
testing requirements.
Utah's final plan to comply
with the
federal Every Student Succeeds Act comes
with one caveat - a request to opt out of student
testing requirements.
On the right, advocates for vouchers and the free market are pushing for
testing loopholes such as opt - out provisions and doling out
federal money in block grants
with no performance
requirements whatsoever.
That
testing requirement, stipulated under the recently signed Assembly Bill 484 — which says that the field, or practice,
test be given instead of state
tests required under
federal law — is also putting the state in conflict
with U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan.
The Editorial Board treads familiar, almost entirely mythological, ground
with their defense of annual
testing of all students: Once upon a time, the
federal government «kept doling out education money to the states no matter how abysmally their school systems performed,» and the
requirement for mass standardized
testing was «to make sure that students in all districts were making progress and that poor and minority students were being educated.»
It is an act of fancy rhetorical footwork to blame states and municipalities for an over focus on standardized
testing when
FEDERAL requirements have incentivized that very focus, first
with threats to label schools as failures under NCLB and then
with the Obama administration pressuring states to use discredited statistical models to evaluate teachers as part of Race to the Top.
It was worded almost exactly as the
federal government's M.O.U. — except that after reciting everything that would be done to link student
tests to teacher evaluations, and to compensate teachers and move them up on a career ladder according to those evaluations, the New York M.O.U. inserted this qualifier: «consistent
with any applicable collective - bargaining
requirements.»
«[B] een in high - level discussions
with decision makers at the U.S. Department of Education to determine how Connecticut can meet onerous
federal requirements, while still reducing
testing.
The state is allowing participating districts to come up
with their own end - of - year assessments to meet the
federal annual
testing requirement — opening the door to having students complete projects or write essays, in lieu of the usual state exams, to prove that they've mastered the Common Core standards.
- Examine vehicle to determine if additional safety or service work is required - Advise Manager if additional work is needed - Document all work performed as soon as job is completed - Attend factory sponsored training classes and keep abreast of factory technical bulletins - Understand and follow
federal, state and local regulations such as disposal of hazardous wastes - Ensure that vehicles are kept clean - Perform all other duties as assigned - Follow all company safety policies and procedures & immediately report any and all accidents to Manager or Supervisor
REQUIREMENTS: - High School Diploma or equivalent - ASE Certification preferred - Automotive Technician - Minimum 2 years previous experience - Excellent driving record - Self - motivated
with ability to perform quality work
with efficiency - All applicants must be authorized to work in the USA - All applicants must have the ability to pass pre-employment
testing to include background checks, MVR, drug
test, and valid driver's license - All applicants must perform duties and responsibilities in a safe manner - Ability to read & comprehend instructions and information - Personal & Professional Integrity - Desire for long - term employment If you're looking to work in a progressive environment
with a rapidly growing organization, than we have a position available for you.
However, as compliance
with the contrary
federal standard,
requirement, or implementation specification is not required until the applicable compliance date, we do not view the state law in question as meeting the
test of being «contrary.»
In order to maintain this standard, CDL Technical & Motorcycle Driving School complies
with the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Part 382 Controlled Drug & Alcohol Use &
Testing requirements.
Comply
with federal and state vehicle
requirements by
testing engine, safety, and combustion control standards.