Sentences with phrase «with general science»

I really enjoy reading you blogs even though I am very familiar with the general science behind in all.

He flunked out, he says, of honours chemistry at McGill, and after graduating with a general science degree, worked for a while at Shell Oil as a business analyst.

Not exact matches

While a healthy rivalry with teammates or competitors can sometimes spur people on in specific situations, in general being acutely aware of your performance is a pretty surefire way to undermine it, according to science.

The director general of the Department of Jobs, Tourism, Science and Innovation, Stephen Wood, will be leaving his job next week, after the government said it was not satisfied with his management of the tourism portfolio.

With the employment landscape shifting rapidly thanks to tech in general and artificial intelligence in particular, and the economy increasingly feeling like a winner - takes - all game, no wonder more and more families are pushing their kids towards practical - seeming, specialized college degrees like finance, computer science, and media.

Kilduff said the science of pricing and trading has evolved into «a new animal,» with «a lot more electronic trading» affecting activity patterns, and «a lot more traders in general, who've never been in this space before.»

Rometty is no exception: She came to Big Blue as a systems engineer in 1981 after graduating from Northwestern with a degree in computer science and electrical engineering at Northwestern and doing a two year stint at the General Motors Institute (a condition of her college scholarship).

General Motors, Toyota, Nissan, Volkswagen, Fiat - Chrysler, BMW, and just about every other auto company are wading — some cautiously and some with big, headline - grabbing moves — into territory that executives in Detroit and elsewhere not long ago considered a science - fiction fantasy.

General Electric has teamed up with Thrillist to combine science and food trends in its latest scheme to attract up - and - coming talent.

But while those suffering severe memory problems are obviously the first contenders for treatment with devices of this type, Science Alert also notes that these findings are part of a more general push toward performance - boosting brain implants that may soon be used by the healthy as well as the impaired.

General Fusion's founder Michel Laberge and CEO Doug Richardson have embarked on a scientific quest with quite astounding ramifications if all the science and engineering proves successful.

But while successful commercial energy from these projects could be decades away, assuming they succeed, Dr. Vogt believes General Fusion will likely be compared to the Cold Fusion experiments of the 1990s — science that was all hype with no validity.

Prime - Our general technology or «Prime» stream includes startups in an array of industries with deep - science and technology innovations.

As I learned more about the history, the bible, science and humanity in general, I found I could no longer say I believed the bible was inerrant and stay honest with myself.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world's largest general scientific society with more than 130,000 members and over 262 affiliated societies and academies of science including over 10 million individuals, has made several statements and issued several press releases in support of evoScience, the world's largest general scientific society with more than 130,000 members and over 262 affiliated societies and academies of science including over 10 million individuals, has made several statements and issued several press releases in support of evoscience including over 10 million individuals, has made several statements and issued several press releases in support of evolution.

The material object of (for instance) a science is the subject - matter, in general, with which it is concerned; its formal object is the specific aspect under which that subject - matter is studied.

Parallel with this mounting prestige of science there has been a general decline in the prestige of religion.

I always attributed this disconnect to my general frustrations with modern evangelicalism — that it's been hijacked by the Republican Party, that it's in a perpetual state of defensiveness and «wartime» posturing, that it has closed itself off to science and independent thought, that it has lost sight of the message of Jesus regarding the Kingdom of God, that it has become commercialized and shallow — all the things we «emergers» like to write books and articles about.

Certainly some sects of some religions are at odds with science, but the general question is more open to opinion.

I find his thesis generally persuasive, and I suggest that a doctrine of regional inclusion would handle the problem with less adjustment of Whitehead's general philosophical position and greater adequacy to the needs of the sciences than Leclerc's proposals.

[19] His writings are justly described as having an epochal place in social science, and in general I find myself in agreement with his theses, to the extent that I can grasp them.

For a person who toots his own horn about how smart he is, you certainly seem to need a lot more study on ancient history, science, and general philosophy coupled with theology.

Neither should we choose any of the numerous works in which Whitehead establishes mathematics as derivative from the abstract theory of classes or intuitive set theory, because in these works he acknowledges the paradoxes in set theory that drove him to affirm for a time Russell's logistic thesis that mathematics is the «science concerned with the logical deduction of consequences from the general premises of all reasoning» (MAT 291).

For example, after trying a number of definitions of mathematics, Whitehead settled in that article on Russell's definition of mathematics as the «science concerned with the logical deduction of consequences from the general premises of all reasoning» (MAT 291), In fact, the article «Mathematics» is the most accessible, most approving and best summary of Principia Mathematica ever done by Whitehead.

In «Stem Cells: A Political History» (November 2008), Joseph Bottum and Ryan T. Anderson make a plausible sounding case that the errors manifest in politicizing the science of embryonic stem - cell research will cause people to be more prudent in the future about mixing science with politics in general.

Finally, Mr. DeVet thinks our article had too optimistic a conclusion, arguing that stem cells «will cause people to be more prudent in the future about mixing science with politics in general.»

If we are not satisfied with what our current practice, science, and philosophy have to say about such a topic as space and place, can we propose an alternative that is more general, more coherent, more potentially effective in practice?

The Need for a New Philosophy of Science Massimo Pigliucci, associate editor for Biology & Philosophy and member of the Philosophy of Science Association has, in his Philosophy Now column, emphasised the philosophical incompatibility of the success of scientific method with a priori, transcendental metaphysics (e.g. of Kant), whilst acknowledging the general lack of a coherent philosophy of sScience Massimo Pigliucci, associate editor for Biology & Philosophy and member of the Philosophy of Science Association has, in his Philosophy Now column, emphasised the philosophical incompatibility of the success of scientific method with a priori, transcendental metaphysics (e.g. of Kant), whilst acknowledging the general lack of a coherent philosophy of sScience Association has, in his Philosophy Now column, emphasised the philosophical incompatibility of the success of scientific method with a priori, transcendental metaphysics (e.g. of Kant), whilst acknowledging the general lack of a coherent philosophy of sciencescience.

But surely she knows that there have been many other Darwinians, from Thomas Henry Huxley in Darwin's day to Richard Dawkins today, who have gone beyond the boundaries of pure science and used «Darwinism» as a metaphysical stick with which to beat theism in general and Christianity in particular.

In addition to the phrasing of B.I.h, with its echo of the Shelley quotation, B.I.e, «General dynamics and the principle of least action,» reminds one, by anticipation, of the role Maupertius will play as hero of «victorious analysis» in Science and the Modern World.

With our knowledge of 21st century empirical science, we can dismiss the empirical errors and focus on the metaphysical principles which underlie material beings from a most general perception of reality.

The electronic age with its offering of a wide variety of ways to present the human voice has commanded new attention to oral language.1 Perhaps the ascendancy of science and the domination of the scientific method has created such a restricted view of language that a reaction in favor of more dimensions to language is to be taken simply as clear testimony to a general degeneration of meaningful discourse, a degeneration in which the church figures prominently.

The «seperated» U.S.A. has a president who was elected thanks to the christian right, who has gone to war after talks with a god, who opposes homosexuals although I don't think homosexuals in general hurt him and who on religious grounds has opposed science, wich could potentially help billions in the next few decades.

The world students» design - science revolution may possibly result in a general reorientation of world society's awareness, common sense, and intelligence which, just «in the nick of time,» will bring mankind into conscious promulgation of the do - more - with - lessing invention revolution to be applied directly to gaining man's living advantage, which can accomplish the 100 percent physical success of all humanity in less than one - half the time it would take to occur only as the inadvertent by - product of further weapons detouring of human initiative.

I will agree with CJAs point that Catholics do in general accept the established theories of science as God's plan for the ordering of the world.

It would certainly be welcome, not only with respect to the interests of science, but to those of society in general, if scientists of all stripes began truly to respect the limits of their own enterprise.

On the principle that all general truths form a coherent system, metaphysics suggests how the general principles of a given science might be reformulated so as to be compatible with the even wider generalities of metaphysics, and hence not to be in conflict with the general principles of the other special areas of interest (PR 15).

But his failure to justify this distinction, by showing how to map a domain of rationality in which the elucidation of metaphysical concepts followed the secure path of a science («in accordance with the example set by geometers and physicists») indicates a general limitation on natural philosophy.

One can in this general way regard the implicate order as a further development of what is already present in Spinoza, as well as in Heraclitus, Cusano, Leibniz, Whitehead and others, a development that is capable of making full contact with modern science, and yet opens up a way to assimilate common experience and general philosophical reflections on this experience, to give a single, whole, unfragmented world view.

As one concerned with the philosophy of science rather than philosophy in general, I must take the latter view, recognizing that there is a great deal that science does not and probably never will know.

And further, the so - called laws of science are at best nothing but a statement of the observed general sequences of behavior in those areas of the Creation with which they are concerned; they are, so to say, «statistical averages,» and they do not cover everything.

In general, this school can be characterized by its acceptance of a logic of science; that is, its members maintain that there is a logic with respect to such scientific activities as the testing of theories, theoretical explanation, and conceptual change.

Bohm notes that we also need «a development that is capable of making full contact with modem science, and yet opens up a way to assimilate common experience and general philosophical reflection on this experience, to give a single, whole, unfragmented world view» (above, p. 42).

C.H. Waddington believes that scientific thought is «just about now beginning to catch up with the first phase of Whitehead's thought,» and that science will proceed in the general direction Whitehead moved in his later work.

She cites a study which analyzes survey data revealing that, since the mid-1970s, a falling percentage of college - educated conservatives claim to «trust science,» compared to relatively stable numbers among liberals, and argues that those who oppose contraception, question the Neo-Darwinist narrative of evolution, or disagree with certain political measures to address global climate change, are opposed to science in general....

The progress of science consists in observing... interconnections [between events] and in showing with a patient ingenuity that the events of this ever - shifting world are but examples of a few general connexions or relations called laws.

A science might come to understand everything about the causes and elements of religion, and might even decide which elements were qualified, by their general harmony with other branches of knowledge, to be considered true; and yet the best man at this science might be the man who found it hardest to be personally devout.

The sciences of nature know nothing of spiritual presences, and on the whole hold no practical commerce whatever with the idealistic conceptions towards which general philosophy inclines.

Scientists are people, they are flawed, and I'm pretty sure God did not provide us with the mental ability to fully understand how he pulled everything off, but either way, In General science spends it's time trying to figure out how God did it... not why... you want to know why... I propose to you, as you suggested I open another book and learn, i propose you open a Bible and learn why God Created you.

Early Christians (Bishop Cyril), are credited with sacking the Library of Alexandria and putting the Human Race's collected wisdom and learning backwards nearly a thousand years, especially in Medicine and General Science, thus helping cause the Dark Ages and all the human suffering that resulted.