Sentences with phrase «with global warming alarmists»

That's how we got here in the first place, with the global warming alarmists convincing low information voters that we should be switching to non-existent alternative energy sources, and the same process is still rolling along at full speed.

But the problem with global warming alarmists getting on their science high horse is that they don't really know the science all that well, or how to talk about it.

Michael Crichton had a big problem with these global warming alarmists who don't really seem to like people much, whether at home or around the globe — e.g.,

That pretty much is how skeptics feel when trying to have an intelligent conversation with global warming alarmist — especially when they can not even admit Mann's hockey stick is political and more social than science.

Then, in keeping with the global warming alarmist playbook, they suggested I disclose who my funders are.

Not exact matches

Two years ago, Asness and an AQR colleague raised hackles with a research paper that argued that the global temperature trends over the last 125 years do not, on their own, support an alarmist view of global warming.

Scientists and others who hope to inform the public or spur action have long struggled with how to convey the high stakes of global warming without making people feel helpless or fueling deniers by coming across as alarmist.

Then it ends by quoting Winston Churchill in a way that's meant to group the furthest - out global - warming alarmist with the likes of RC and other responsible scientists: «A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.»

If science advocacy has to include statements such as «Alas, as with most over-simplified global warming claptrap, more thought goes into coming up with the alarmist concept than in actually looking into whether or not it is true», then I don't think it belongs in the discussion.

Skeptics have long cited Doran's research to show that global warming is a flawed theory motivated by alarmist scientists more interested in scaring up huge research grants than in pursuing the evidence with honesty and integrity.

He withdrew any kind of bipartisan support for an ETS (and more)» «two years ago Canadians gave majority government to Stephen Harper's Conservatives, who were pledged to a sensible use of its resources, so Australians have now elected a government with a pragmatic attitude on global warming» «Led by Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, an attempt was made, by what can only be described as alarmists, to exploit these fires for the purposes of the global warming debate.

«Since its creation in 2006 the site has done nothing but post poorly researched propaganda with a clear intent to smear respected scientists, policy analysts or groups who dare oppose an alarmist position on global warming.

Global warming alarmists claim that such incidences have nothing to do with a climate trend.

The message I'm taking away from this is that if you are a Global Warming Alarmist you can grope women to your heart's content and get away with it.

in one day over the global warming alarmists «Splattergate» film featuring skeptical children being blown up by their teacher for refusing to go along with climate edicts.

Tuesday night's presidential debate surprisingly united global warming alarmists with global warming skeptics.

No matter how many stories seek to distract you with the shiny objects of prurient dialogue between sniveling, petulant and nasty global warming alarmists, that isn't the story.

While perhaps failing to observe the irony of its own reporting, the Times juxtaposed the thoroughly discredited population explosion theories of the 1970s with the (equally alarmist) global warming predictions of our day.

If I was willing to change my views to ingratiate myself with a funding source I would by now be on the global warming alarmist bandwagon.»

An alarmist organisation whose sole existence is thanks to the overblown «climate crisis» comes up with a report that justifies its own existence and reassures everyone that the massive, unnecessary new tax will have far less of an effect on food prices than the evils of «global warming».

Like many other conference speakers and attendees, Secretary - General Ban cited the recent droughts, floods, and Tropical Storm Sandy as proof of the dire consequences of man - made global warming, even though many studies and scientists (including scientists who usually fall into the climate alarmist category) have stated that there is no evidence to support claims that «extreme weather» has been increasing in frequency and / or magnitude in recent years, or that extreme events (hurricanes, droughts, heat waves, etc.) have anything to do with increased CO2 levels.

My criticism of this site and many others is that, in an overreaction to the alarmists» obsession with predicting and controlling the future, most sceptics refuse to speculate on how the politics of global warming will develop, and just assume that the truth will out, that the Emperor's nakedness will become evident, and we can all go back to leading normal lives.

'' -LSB-...] for the alarmists, global warming has nothing to do with science or scientific inquiry.

The alarmists at the IPCC and «Big Green» like to point to the gigantic icebergs produced by Antarctica as proof that global warming is directly melting the polar continent with high temperatures.

Preventing asthma is now the principal reason brought forward by the global warming alarmists in Congress to cripple the U. S. economy with energy - rationing regulations.

As the actual climate truths and realities are finally being reported by the world's press (Der Spiegel, The Financial Times, etc.), the UN's global warming chief alarmist continues with delusional denial.

He and his coconspirators are so desperate to discredit anyone who disagrees with their alarmist views on man - made global warming that they are willing to lie, steal, and even defraud their own friends and allies in the media.»

Now compound this massive propaganda failure by the anti-growth Democrats with this week's latest climate science news from the world's premier science journal and a leading global warming alarmist scientist: natural ocean oscillations are responsible for Earth's modern temperature changes, not human CO2.

I've come to the conclusion that the paper acts as an excellent carrot, which when combined with the terrible example of Mann's floundering to defend the indefensible (as the stick) may tempt some people to row back from some silly alarmist positions they've taken on global warming.

Please, provide a plot of the number of scientists who dare speak against global warming alarmists vs. year, with the source.

Unfortunately the global warming alarmists have done just that and gotten away with it until Climategate.

As has been the case with other attempts to vilify, intimidate and silence experts who disagree with alarmist views on global warming and climate change, Kaine presented an argument rife with logical fallacies — appeals to emotion, straw men, ridicule, oversimplification and misrepresentation.

This is what happens when you send people from liberal Brown University, who conveniently come up with another scare - a-rama about global warming, in what appears to be another feeble «alarmist» attempt to counter climategate and all the other «gates» since.

WARMING alarmists rebut the 1970's global cooling scare with claims that the phenomenon wasn't «peer - reviewed» or that a «consensus» of «97 %» of «scientists» didn't agree.

This edition has been revised and reformulated with a new chapter template of short chapter introductions, study questions at... View Details Global Warming - Alarmists, Skeptics and Deniers: A Geoscientist Looks at the Science of Climate Change by G. Dedrick Robinson (Author), Gene D. Robinson III (Author) Global Warming - Alarmists, Skeptics & Deniers: A Geoscientist looks at the Science of Climate Change, brings a unique geological perspective to this politically charged issue, a perspective that has been ignored far too long.

Dr. Hansen, along with a number of other climate change alarmists (like Al Gore), believes that man is the chief cause of global warming, and that warming is generally harmful.

And I assume the Sierra Club would issue a public retraction if confronted with the facts that the data are precisely as I described that over the last 18 years there has been no significant warming and indeed that is why global warming alarmists invented the term «the pause» to explain what they called the pause in global warming because the data demonstrate what you just said, that the Earth is cooking and warming, is not back up by the data.

I would be more impressed with everything global warming alarmists believe in if I was still in Sunday school.

Susan Crockford is a polar bear expert with a message that climate alarmists don't want to hear: polar bear populations are thriving and are certainly in no danger from thinning summer sea ice supposedly caused by «man - made global warming.»

I always wondered how much of the climate records were tampered with for the global warming alarmist money / agenda.

Then thereâ $ ™ s the pesky issue of â $ œconsensus.â $ Alarmists typically counter any fact - based global warming argument with the assertion that the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has already ruled on the issue, and therefore â $ œthe science is settledâ $ and â $ œthe debate is over.â $ â $ œMild winter temperatures will decrease heavy snowstorms, â $ IPCC claimed in its 2001 Third Assessment.

The chart starts in 1988 (5 - years ending 1988) when NASA's chief global warming alarmist predicted (at a U.S. Senate hearing) that the U.S. would also suffer from the global warming trend with dire consequences.

«MSM - Caused Confusion: They Confuse «Global Warming» With «Climate Change» - As Top Climate Scientist Explains, They're Not The Same Main Are Climate Alarmist Scientists Guilty For Deaths of Millions?

Former global - warming alarmist and «Gaia Guru» Dr. James Lovelock is once again doing combat with his erstwhile comrades in the «green» movement, dishing out scorn for the United Nations» Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which recently issued its latest dire global - warming predictions.

Current results continue to be fairly consistent with my personal theory, that man - made CO2 may add 0.5 - 1C to global temperatures over the next century (below alarmist estimates), but that this warming may be swamped at times by natural climactic fluctuations that alarmists tend to under - estimate.

SCARBOROUGH: And, and, and Tyson, isn't that again — you heard the beginning of this conversation with both John and I believe there is global warming, we just think Al Gore and others are being alarmists about it.

It seems that the Obama administration, which has increasingly turned to unconstitutional «climate» edicts and decrees as the UN's global warming theories crumble, agrees with Figures and other alarmists about the Chinese model.

According to Taylor, «This newest round of global warming alarmism — with global warming activists and their willfully ignorant media allies attempting to dupe people into believing global warming is causing a decline in wheat harvests — is a perfect illustration of all that is wrong with the alarmist global warming movement.»

After becoming fed up with the childish and dangerous tactics of alarmists, particularly the use of the term «climate denier,» Spencer said that the «global - warming Nazis» were in fact threatening millions of lives — especially among the poor — with their «pseudo-scientific ramblings» and support for fascist - style «radical policies» supposedly aimed at combating «global warming.»

Barely has the year begun and already the climate alarmist propaganda machine is up to its old tricks, trying to scare you with made up science stories promising global warming - related doom and gloom...