Sentences with phrase «with high depression scores»

«Our results suggest it would be a good idea for clinicians to pay particular attention to women with high depression scores when evaluating the risk of gestational diabetes,» Dr. Zhang added.

Not exact matches

«College students who reported positive fantasies tended to report putting less effort into their coursework; this was, in turn, associated with lower grades and higher depression scores,» reports the release, though the study's authors caution more research is needed.

API: Looking at your website, we can see that higher ACE scores are associated with adult alcoholism, chronic depression, perpetrating domestic violence, smoking, being raped, suicide attempts, teen sex and pregnancy, employee absenteeism and job performance.

With that caveat in mind, students in the biological sciences appear to be faring more poorly than those in the physical sciences and engineering: Their average depression score is slightly higher, and their career optimism score is lower (4.1 versus 4.7).

According to the study results higher anxiety and anger scores, depression and caregiver stress were associated with increased risk of CAC greater than 100 units (moderate to severe disease) in patients with RA.

Children who had a high genetic sensitivity score are generally believed to have genotypes implicated in behaviors related to issues with attention, aggression and depression, for example.

Well, for one, the residents of the top five cities have significantly lower rates, on average, of a handful of diseases (from diabetes to high cholesterol to depression) compared to people living in cities with low scores.

Depression at screening was assessed with the Geriatric Depression Scale (score range, 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depression) 12; a score of 6 or less was considered to indicate the absence of dDepression at screening was assessed with the Geriatric Depression Scale (score range, 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depression) 12; a score of 6 or less was considered to indicate the absence of dDepression Scale (score range, 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depression) 12; a score of 6 or less was considered to indicate the absence of ddepression) 12; a score of 6 or less was considered to indicate the absence of depressiondepression.

Depression was associated with higher GI quintiles; younger age; higher BMI; less physical activity; higher intakes of SFAs, MUFAs, PUFAs, and trans fat; and lower intakes of fruit, vegetables, dietary fiber, and Healthy Eating Index score.

This meta - analysis of social and emotional learning interventions (including 213 school - based SEL programs and 270,000 students from rural, suburban and urban areas) showed that social and emotional learning interventions had the following effects on students ages 5 - 18: decreased emotional distress such as anxiety and depression, improved social and emotional skills (e.g., self - awareness, self - management, etc.), improved attitudes about self, others, and school (including higher academic motivation, stronger bonding with school and teachers, and more positive attitudes about school), improvement in prosocial school and classroom behavior (e.g., following classroom rules), decreased classroom misbehavior and aggression, and improved academic performance (e.g. standardized achievement test scores).

The range of the scores for each scale is 0 - 21 points, with higher scores indicating more adverse symptoms (i.e., higher symptoms of anxiety and depression)[20][21].

Maternal depression was assessed at 6.5 and 12 months on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), 45,46 a 21 - item self - report measure, which has strong internal consistency reliability, r = 0.93,47 high test - retest reliability over an 18 - month period, r = 0.68,48 and is highly correlated with in - depth clinical assessments of depression, median r = 0.66.46 The average of the 2 BDI scores was used except in those cases where only one score wasdepression was assessed at 6.5 and 12 months on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), 45,46 a 21 - item self - report measure, which has strong internal consistency reliability, r = 0.93,47 high test - retest reliability over an 18 - month period, r = 0.68,48 and is highly correlated with in - depth clinical assessments of depression, median r = 0.66.46 The average of the 2 BDI scores was used except in those cases where only one score wasDepression Inventory (BDI), 45,46 a 21 - item self - report measure, which has strong internal consistency reliability, r = 0.93,47 high test - retest reliability over an 18 - month period, r = 0.68,48 and is highly correlated with in - depth clinical assessments of depression, median r = 0.66.46 The average of the 2 BDI scores was used except in those cases where only one score wasdepression, median r = 0.66.46 The average of the 2 BDI scores was used except in those cases where only one score was obtained.

At both baseline and follow - up there was a high rate of depressive symptoms with one third of the group scoring 14 or more on the Beck Depression Inventory (a questionnaire designed to measure severity of depressive symptoms).

The high correlation of EPDS scores with BDI scores (0.73) suggests that there may, in fact, be no need for a separate scale to assess postpartum depression.

Depressive symptoms during the week preceding the interview were measured with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).26 The 10 - item questionnaire was summed to a continuous score where higher scores indicated greater frequency of depressive symptoms.

The pre — post effect size (d) was 0.95, and pre — follow - up was 1.08, comparable to effect sizes published investigating face - to - face mindfulness interventions for depressive symptoms in those with diabetes, PTSD and cancer15, 56, 57 and online cognitive therapy interventions for depressive symptoms in a moderately depressed sample.27, 36 The change in PHQ - 9 is higher than effect sizes found for IAPT depression and anxiety treatment where follow - up was at 4 and 8 months (0.46 and 0.63, respectively) 3 where the IAPT sample started with higher baseline depression scores.

Included studies used several tools for measuring the severity of depressive symptoms, namely the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM - D), 21 22 30 34 35 Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ - 9), 24 36 Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), 23 26 28 Hopkins Symptom Checklist - 20 (HSCL - 20), 37 38 Montgomery - Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), 18 25 27 Beck Depression Inventory - Fast Screen (BDI - FS) 39 and Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D).40 These tools have different score ranges (HAM - D = 0 — 53, PHQ - 9 = 0 — 27, GDS = 0 — 15, HSCL - 20 = 0 — 4, MADRS = 0 — 60, BDI - FS = 0 — 21 and CES - D = 0 — 60), with higher scores in all tools representing increasing severity of depressive symptoms.

Inclusion criteria: cancer prognosis of 6 months or more; major depressive disorder for ⩾ 1 month not associated with a change of cancer or cancer management; and a score of ⩾ 1.75 on the Symptom Checklist - 20 (SCL - 20) depression scale (score range 1 — 4, higher score indicating greater levels of depressive symptoms).

Marital status did not affect the number of mothers of the autism groups who had elevated depression scores, but single mothers in both groups had higher elevated depression scores than mothers living with partners, (x2 = 6.4, p

The depression scores of the maltreated children with the s / s genotype and low supports were two times higher than the depression scores of CC children with the same genotype and social support profile (high - risk maltreatment, 30.0 ± 12.3; high - risk CCs, 15.0 ± 6.4).

A covariate was included in the multivariate analyses if theoretical or empirical evidence supported its role as a risk factor for obesity, if it was a significant predictor of obesity in univariate regression models, or if including it in the full multivariate model led to a 5 % or greater change in the OR.48 Model 1 includes maternal IPV exposure, race / ethnicity (black, white, Hispanic, other / unknown), child sex (male, female), maternal age (20 - 25, 26 - 28, 29 - 33, 34 - 50 years), maternal education (less than high school, high school graduation, beyond high school), maternal nativity (US born, yes or no), child age in months, relationship with father (yes or no), maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes or no), maternal depression (as measured by a CIDI - SF cutoff score ≥ 0.5), maternal BMI (normal / underweight, overweight, obese), low birth weight (< 2500 g, ≥ 2500 g), whether the child takes a bottle to bed at age 3 years (yes or no), and average hours of child television viewing per day at age 3 years (< 2 h / d, ≥ 2 h / d).

The HADS has well established clinical cut - off scores with a score higher than 7 indicating elevated symptoms of anxiety or depression and a score higher than 10 indicating anxiety or depression in the clinically significant range.

Maltreated children with the s / s genotype and no positive supports had the highest depression ratings, scores that were twice as high as the non-maltreated comparison children with the same genotype.

However, to make our results easier to report and understand, we have chosen to refer to mothers with a score of 16 or higher as depressed or having depression.

Except for maltreated children with the s / s genotype, maltreated children with monthly or more frequent contact with their primary support had relatively low depression scores (which were, on average, only 3 points higher than the mean depression score of the CC group).

Maltreated children with the s / s genotype and low social supports had markedly elevated depression scores, ratings that were approximately twice as high as those of CCs with the same genotype and social support profile (high - risk CC, 15.0 ± 8.3; high - risk maltreated, 30.0 ± 12.3).

Group differences in the Child Behavior Checklist scores showed that parents in the intervention group reported higher scores than those in the UC group on the aggressive behavior subscale (7.74 vs 6.80; adjusted β, 0.83 [95 % CI, 0.37 - 1.30]-RRB-, although neither group reached a subscale score of clinical significance (the cutoff for this age is 22 years)(Table 3).14 There were no group differences in reported sleep problems or problems with depression or anxiety.

The depression scores of the maltreated children with the s / s genotype that had relatively regular contact with their primary supports were 67 % higher than those of the maltreated children with less vulnerable genotypes who had comparable contact with their supports.

Higher stress exposure and perceived stress during pregnancy have been linked to GDM and / or higher glucose levels in women.43 — 45 Psychological stress and negative life events can be associated with higher salivary cortisol levels during pregnancy, which might relate to higher glucose levels.46 Higher depression scores early in pregnancy also increase the risk for GDM.9 47 On the other hand, social support has been shown to be protective regarding mental health and depression in particular.9Higher stress exposure and perceived stress during pregnancy have been linked to GDM and / or higher glucose levels in women.43 — 45 Psychological stress and negative life events can be associated with higher salivary cortisol levels during pregnancy, which might relate to higher glucose levels.46 Higher depression scores early in pregnancy also increase the risk for GDM.9 47 On the other hand, social support has been shown to be protective regarding mental health and depression in particular.9higher glucose levels in women.43 — 45 Psychological stress and negative life events can be associated with higher salivary cortisol levels during pregnancy, which might relate to higher glucose levels.46 Higher depression scores early in pregnancy also increase the risk for GDM.9 47 On the other hand, social support has been shown to be protective regarding mental health and depression in particular.9higher salivary cortisol levels during pregnancy, which might relate to higher glucose levels.46 Higher depression scores early in pregnancy also increase the risk for GDM.9 47 On the other hand, social support has been shown to be protective regarding mental health and depression in particular.9higher glucose levels.46 Higher depression scores early in pregnancy also increase the risk for GDM.9 47 On the other hand, social support has been shown to be protective regarding mental health and depression in particular.9Higher depression scores early in pregnancy also increase the risk for GDM.9 47 On the other hand, social support has been shown to be protective regarding mental health and depression in particular.9 48 49

Other researchers compared psychometric properties between online and paper versions of depression instruments administered to primary care and psychiatric care patients.22 The findings indicated equivalence and no clinically relevant differences between method of administration with high correlations found between both scores.

Scores ranged from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating a higher level of depreScores ranged from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating a higher level of deprescores indicating a higher level of depression.

Main Outcome Measures Child diagnoses based on the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia; child symptoms based on the Child Behavior Checklist; child functioning based on the Child Global Assessment Scale in mothers whose depression with treatment remitted with a score of 7 or lower or whose depression did not remit with a score higher than 7 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Ddepression with treatment remitted with a score of 7 or lower or whose depression did not remit with a score higher than 7 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Ddepression did not remit with a score higher than 7 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for DepressionDepression.

Within the maltreated group, the children with l / l or l / s genotype had only slight elevations in their depression scores compared with CCs, but the children with s / s, the most vulnerable genotype, had depression scores that were twice as high as the depression scores of the CC children with the same genotype (maltreatment plus s / s genotype, 27.2 ± 13.0; CC plus s / s genotype, 13.1 ± 6.4) and almost twice as high as the depression scores of the maltreated children with the other genotypes.

The items in each subscale were on a four - point scale ranging from «strongly disagree» (1) to «strongly agree» (4) yielding possible scores from seven to 28, with a higher score indicating a greater level of general anxiety and depression.

Many of the scales demonstrated weak psychometrics in at least one of the following ways: (a) lack of psychometric data [i.e., reliability and / or validity; e.g., HFQ, MASC, PBS, Social Adjustment Scale - Self - Report (SAS - SR) and all perceived self - esteem and self - concept scales], (b) items that fall on more than one subscale (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version), (c) low alpha coefficients (e.g., below.60) for some subscales, which calls into question the utility of using these subscales in research and clinical work (e.g., HFQ, MMPI - A, CBCL - 1991 version, BASC, PSPCSAYC), (d) high correlations between subscales (e.g., PANAS - C), (e) lack of clarity regarding clinically - relevant cut - off scores, yielding high false positive and false negative rates (e.g., CES - D, CDI) and an inability to distinguish between minor (i.e., subclinical) and major (i.e., clinical) «cases» of a disorder (e.g., depression; CDI, BDI), (f) lack of correspondence between items and DSM criteria (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version, CDI, BDI, CES - D, (g) a factor structure that lacks clarity across studies (e.g., PSPCSAYC, CASI; although the factor structure is often difficult to assess in studies of pediatric populations, given the small sample sizes), (h) low inter-rater reliability for interview and observational methods (e.g., CGAS), (i) low correlations between respondents such as child, parent, teacher [e.g., BASC, PSPCSAYC, CSI, FSSC - R, SCARED, Connors Ratings Scales - Revised (CRS - R)-RSB-, (j) the inclusion of somatic or physical symptom items on mental health subscales (e.g., CBCL), which is a problem when conducting studies of children with pediatric physical conditions because physical symptoms may be a feature of the condition rather than an indicator of a mental health problem, (k) high correlations with measures of social desirability, which is particularly problematic for the self - related rating scales and for child - report scales more generally, and (l) content validity problems (e.g., the RCMAS is a measure of anxiety, but contains items that tap mood, attention, peer interactions, and impulsivity).

Cognitive behavior therapy showed a lower rate of MDD at the end of treatment compared with NST (17.1 % vs 42.4 %; P =.02), and resulted in a higher rate of remission (64.7 %, defined as absence of MDD and at least 3 consecutive Beck Depression Inventory scores < 9) than SBFT (37.9 %; P =.03) or NST (39.4 %; P =.04).

High school students in health classes were screened for depression using the Center for Epidemiological Studies — Depression Scale (CES - D) and those with elevated scores underwent a diagnostic depression using the Center for Epidemiological Studies — Depression Scale (CES - D) and those with elevated scores underwent a diagnostic Depression Scale (CES - D) and those with elevated scores underwent a diagnostic interview.

This meta - analysis of social and emotional learning interventions (including 213 school - based SEL programs and 270,000 students from rural, suburban and urban areas) showed that social and emotional learning interventions had the following effects on students ages 5 - 18: decreased emotional distress such as anxiety and depression, improved social and emotional skills (e.g., self - awareness, self - management, etc.), improved attitudes about self, others, and school (including higher academic motivation, stronger bonding with school and teachers, and more positive attitudes about school), improvement in prosocial school and classroom behavior (e.g., following classroom rules), decreased classroom misbehavior and aggression, and improved academic performance (e.g. standardized achievement test scores).

Primary outcomes were the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS) 25,26 for PTSD symptoms and the Symptom Checklist Depression Scale (SCL - 20) for depressive symptoms.27 The PDS (17 items) assesses severity of PTSD symptoms over the prior 4 weeks with high internal consistency and test - retest reliability26; scores are summed and range from 0 to 51; scores of 10 or less are mild; 11 to 20, moderate; 21 to 35, moderate to severe; and at least 36, severe.

ABFT has been reviewed by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's National Registry of Evidence - based Programs and Practices (NREPP) and awarded a quality of research score of 3.5 for depression and 3.6 for suicide ideation and a 4.0 for readiness for dissemination (based on a scale of 0.0 - 4.0, with 4.0 being the highest)

The possible range of scores for EDS and SCL -90-R is 0 — 30, with higher scores indicative of more severe depression or anxiety [78, 81].

Patients with chronic depression had significantly higher relationship dissatisfaction scores than patients with non-chronic depression.

High neuroticism scores are related to reduced psychosocial wellbeing, psychological adjustment and quality of life in patients with IBD [81] or higher depression and anxiety vulnerability.

This cutoff point corresponds to 80th percentile scores for community samples and has a 95 % sensitivity for diagnosing major depressive disorder (MDD) among low - income women, although the specificity and positive predictive value for MDD are low (70 % and 0.28, respectively).29, 30 The cutoff point of 16 has been used by many investigators assessing depressive symptoms in a variety of cohorts, including pregnant women.28 — 33 When studying depressive symptoms during pregnancy, some investigators chose to use a higher CES - D cutoff point (eg, the 90th percentile) to account for the possibility that symptoms of normal pregnancy may overlap with symptoms of depression.9, 18 There is no evidence that this approach is more accurate or preferable to using the cutoff point of 16, and the use of higher cutoff points increases specificity but decreases sensitivity for MDD.28 We used a consistent cutoff point of 16 to define depressive symptoms before and after parturition.

General indices regarding mental health of mothers have been associated with their children's sleep, and less well - organized sleep patterns have been noted in children from poorly functioning families.113) Mothers of children with sleep disturbances exhibited much higher psychological stress than did controls, obtaining increased scores on all factors of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ).114) Children's sleep quality significantly predicted that of their mothers, with maternal sleep quality associated with stress and fatigue.115) Moreover, infants of mothers with low levels of depression and anxiety were more likely to recover from sleep problems than those with high levels of depression and anxiety after controlling for the influence of attachment patterns.116) Sleep disturbances in early childhood were positively related to negative maternal perceptions of their child, 117) potentially interfering with the development of beneficial parent - child interactions.

Scores on the depression subscale range from zero to 42, with higher scores reflecting greater sevScores on the depression subscale range from zero to 42, with higher scores reflecting greater sevscores reflecting greater severity.

Furthermore, altered frontal FC in infants born to mothers with higher fluctuation of a maternal depression score from pre - to post-natal period may reflect a neural basis for the familial transmission of phenotypes associated with psychopathology.

Their mothers had higher Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores (median: 8 vs 5) and more difficulties with their partner undermining the management of their child.

Persistence or recurrence of infant sleep problems in the preschool years is common and is associated with slightly higher child behavior problems and maternal depression scores.