Not exact matches
With huge stores
of carbon in peat, the fear is that rising global temperatures could cause the release
of massive
amounts of CO2 from the peatlands into the atmosphere — essentially creating a greenhouse gas feedback loop.
«By continuing to put these
huge amounts of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, we're gambling
with climate and the outcome is still uncertain,» Zeebe said.
Tropical rainforests, and especially the Amazon, are another major worry — they, too, store
huge amounts of carbon, but are already being heavily deforested,
with concerns that climate change could also increase their vulnerability.
But soil
with 15 %
carbon holds a
huge amount of water compared to the current levels
of closer to an average
of 1 or 2 %, thus mitigating most extreme events.
Rural India and Africa require
huge amounts of development and that development has bog all to do
with developed world attempts to move to less
carbon - intensive energy sources.
Which is a good job, given the shortage
of high - grade uranium ore, the
huge unmanageable risks associated
with nuclear plants and nuclear proliferation, the large
amounts of embedded
carbon in uranium refining and processing (and other GHG emissions from the nuclear industry), and the insanity
of developing a
huge strategic fuel dependence on countries such as Russia.
At the end
of this post, there's more on one facet
of the climate question that Mr. Dyson did examine in some depth back in 1976 — the prospect
of pulling
huge amounts of carbon dioxide out
of the air
with specially bred trees.
With carbon dioxide levels shooting up to unprecedented levels, it is high time we group together for a concerted action against the
huge amounts of climate - change - inducing emissions from fires in Hell.
That's troubling because a
huge amount of dead plant life, packed
with carbon, is frozen in Arctic soils.
But our human waste system
with huge amounts of paper and other cellulose products have 5 - 10 times more biocarbon that we let get degraded to reemit GHGs when we could be converting them to inert
carbon.
With the stroke
of a pen the technocrats quietly absolved government
of all responsibility to reduce emissions from some
of the most obvious and most tractable sources
of pollution in the land: the fossil - fuel devouring power stations and factories whose smokestacks belch millions
of tonnes
of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year — not to mention
huge amounts of other pollutants which damage our health more directly than CO2.