I think the verse has to do
with human nature....
Balthasar doesn't necessarily mean form in a strictly scholastic sense here; rather he means that reality which we,
with our human minds, are able to grasp.
«According to our Teacher, just as they are sinners who contract a second marriage, even though it be in accord
with human law, so also are they sinners who look with lustful desire at a woman.
But «capitalism
with a human face» still is not socialism.
it has everything to do
with the human will and nothing to do with education or training, it is sad you can not comprehend this.
He is also the author of Parables at Work (Westminster) and God
with a Human Face (Westminster / Knox).
His theological difference with Berger would come not with Berger's starting
with human experience but with his desire to end there.
I'd take a deep / meaningful conversation
with a human being (of any faith / non-faith) over a volume of systematic theology any day.
This was the Incarnation: Et Verbum caro factum est. 20 And from this first, basic contact of God
with our human race, and precisely by virtue of this penetration of the divine into our human nature, a new life was born: that unforeseeable aggrandizement and «obediential ’21 extension of our natural capacities which we call «grace».
And though there is the language of God, it has more to do
with the human institution and what people in that insituttion are comfortable with about what they want God to be?
He paid the price of a bitter death, rather than weaken the intimacy of his relationship
with the human lot, with all its suffering and failure.
Got ta watch out for temples made
with human hands.
Would such belief be any more dangerous than an alignment
with any human movement or world view?
What he offered was the spirit of love acting in self - identification
with human needs.
What is more, if such a development should take place, AA might set a pattern for a more fundamental cooperation between religion and psychology in dealing
with human problems in general.
For he is determined finally and forever to be reconciled
with the human race, and the enmity which exists can only be overcome if he takes all wrath — his as well as ours — up into himself.
The belief that the Incarnate One possessed both human and divine natures raised a few additional questions on this matter: Did Christ's divine nature also have an external appearance through its union
with the human one?
In magic anything might turn into anything else in the twinkling of an eye before one's face; but such nature - oriented, visual, spatial, magical imagery has little if anything to do
with human transformation.
Capitalism, at its best, unleashes the creative impulse commensurate
with all human freedom.
And it's hard enough to cope
with human suffering without worrying about the suffering of other animals.
People have varying kinds of experience
with human fathers and, as soon as one speaks of God as father, some are sure to project upon God the dependency, fear, hostility or resentment that has marked their relationship with their earthly father.
Likewise Camus is sensitive to the «sacred,» but faced with God's silence, he concerns
himself with human love and justice.
«We live in an age when this Court has demonstrated, while interpreting Article 21 of the Constitution, that every person is entitled to a quality of life consistent
with his human personality.
«The kind on thinking I saw in Saudi Arabia and among the Brotherhood of Kenya and Som - alia, is incompatible
with human rights and liberal values.
We must start
with the human person in his existential experience.
His frequent expressions and gestures of solidarity
with the human race have often been rejected.
The fact that President Trump's executive order allows the government to prioritize individual claims of religious - based persecution from religious minorities — whether Christian, Yazidi, Jew, Muslim, Bahá» í, Buddhist, etc. — should be welcome news to every Christian and everyone concerned
with human rights and religious freedom.
«I stand in solidarity
with human beings because, well, they are created in my image and I love them,» God said.
Epiphany brought with it a sense of solidarity
with the human race for whom Christ came.
The answer is pretty specific and pretty basic and it has to do
with human sexuality, as that is how LGTQ, or current label differ from long - held teaching and tradition, and also what nature would seem to indicate.
Usually when theologians say that the Bible is a human book, they mean that the Bible has human authors who use human words to discuss human ideas to human readers
with human ways of thinking.
Her blog, The Underground Railroad, is a small rag dealing
with human trafficking and other justice issues.
As I stated in my original article, prior to conducting experiments
with human cells, ANT - OAR techniques would need to be rigorously tested in animal models to establish a procedure that guarantees with reasonable certainty that an embryo is not generated.
Rather, itis the reality of the union of Christ
with the human race which is the template for the meaning of the sexes: the sexes were made for this, they point to it, they mirror it.
But as we move through the scriptures and analyze the accounts of how God deals
with human beings, coercion is rare.
There are other, functional, nonreligious ways to deal
with the human condition.
Only the true word of god, the one that became flesh, Jesus, shows us how god really is and how to see and deal
with the human / error sides of the bible.
He doesn't fit in
with the human agendas and human plans that have priority.
This was because the fallen angels (sons of God) existed before creation (before man) had intermarried
with the human race (daughters of man) as a devil's plan in order to stop, corrupt man's seed which was God's plan to that seed will bruise Satan's head.....
A person's voluntary encounter
with human suffering should always be viewed as a cry of protest and a testimony of hope against the overwhelming evil that one experiences.
As long as it was assumed that the world that originally came into being was much like our present world,
with human beings coming into existence abruptly in their present form, it was hard to think of origins in terms of chance and necessity.
Martinetti (and Benedict) affirm that Christianity implies a priorithat any such «extrarational» revelation will in facthave a reason and be in profound harmony
with human reason.
Good may or may not be an absolute but it is something that humans must negotiate and refine
with the human collective.
Researchers have injected mice
with human breast, ovary, colon, bladder, brain, liver and prostate tumors, and their new drug has killed the tumors every time.
Religion doesn't attributes
with human being... Religion only guides you, but men can always do what he wanted to do...
Is» t the first is a mankind but with a beast mind and heart, while the second should be a Human
with a human mind and heart??
Despite Heidegger's urgent insistence to the contrary, Mason seems actively determined to identify Dasein with the epistemological subject, which is to say
with the human individual in the subjectivity of his «me, here, now.»
We should not lament the absence of a divine call to annihilate «the other» but celebrate the progress of the human spirit that enables us to «fulfill the task»
with human generosity and a moral conscience.
With God out of the picture, now we have to ask «what in Hell is wrong
with human nature.»
Another suggestion is a «theological study in dialogue
with the human sciences to develop a multi-faceted look at the phenomenon of homosexuality.»