Covers basic conditioning as seen in all animals, including humans and covers topics associated more
with human behavior such as thinking, private events, institutions and culture.
«If you want to deal with climate change, you have to deal
with human behavior.»
The problem as well as the solution lies
with human behavior, and human behavior can be altered.
In the context of this article, the professionals we mention are implied to be animal behaviorists, because the general term «behaviorist» can also include those who work
with human behavior as well.
behaviorists, because the general term «behaviorist» can also include those who work
with human behavior as well.
Our tendency is to associate a dog's behavior
with human behavior.
As always, real behavior change in our dogs starts
with human behavior change.
The same is true
with human behavior... try raising a teenager sometime.
You call yourself an «online dating expert» or tell yourself that you're «obsessed
with human behavior».
So I'm going to be spending time in the future looking into this area,
with human behavior as a special case.
First I like to see a fascination
with human behavior -LSB-...]
That lifelong fascination
with human behavior has informed his work with the world's largest corporations, first at Amherst Consulting Group, which he founded in 1983 and sold in 1999, and more recently with 180 Partners.
You are obviously blinded by the technology, that has nothing to do
with the human behaviors, dumber, dumber.
Not exact matches
Although there's overwhelming scientific consensus behind the concept that
human behavior is affecting the climate, most of the world and the U.S. in particular is still dealing
with climate change deniers.
The
human tendency is to automatically assume the question refers to consuming illegal narcotics or engaging in high - risk
behaviors with potentially life - threatening consequences.
Not only do you have to understand
human search
behaviors and how people search for content within the confines of an internet search engine, but you also have to get familiar
with Google's machine learning components - i.e. RankBrain.
As someone who studies
human behavior for a living, Van Edwards shares key insights for establishing rapport, building charisma, and decoding
behavior patterns in order to transform our interactions
with people.
With the incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI), bots are no longer one dimensional search tools, they are dynamic machines that can query information, learn your
behaviors, anticipate problems, and organize tasks for their
human counterparts.
«Everyone looks at the past and recognizes flawed
human beliefs and
behaviors, but no one realizes future generations will do the same
with us,» investor Chuck Gafvert points out.
You can see the ethical dilemma in a basic - income experiment: You're toying
with people's financial health, and, by judging your endpoints based on feelings, you're tinkering
with and assessing
human behavior.
Which explains why Reddit is often associated less
with news and more
with unruly or even offensive content such as the GamerGate controversy, or even worse examples of the darker side of
human behavior that have appeared there in recent years.
The idea is that a robot
with properly attuned social gaze
behaviors will be more capable of communicating smoothly
with a
human.
In a three - minute summary of his thesis on YouTube, Andrist explains that — so far in his research — conversations between
humans and robots have become much more fluid, after the robots were programmed
with proper social gaze
behavior.
Lots of important social interactions are happening online and being captured by social media companies; the only way to understand certain elements of
human behavior is
with these partnerships.»
The Bible also tells us that the wolf will lie down
with the lamb (Isaiah 11:6), meaning that once the curse of sin is removed, the animals»
behavior will change and we
humans will no longer need them for food and clothing.
By declaring that
human beings are born
with an innate bent toward acting antisocial and selfish, it predicts all the
behaviors we keep ragging on about.
Chapter of Romans,
with its account of humanity's movement from God toward idolatry, has furnished the text for countless sermons claiming that homosexual
behavior signifies the lowest depths of
human depravity.
It helps manage the disappointment when the cool new group you find yourself
with is eventually revealed to be full of flawed and fallible
human beings, and it helps to free you from the initial desire to rationalize shitty
behavior within a group merely for the sake of identity politics.»
With the changing demographics in America, including the racial and ethnic, socioeconomic, immigration, and biblical justice challenges of our day, it is more important than ever for people of color to have safe places to live authentically, serve humbly, and use their influence and experiences to shape our theology (what we know and believe about God) and our praxis (the ethics of our
human behavior or what we actually do).
He even comes up
with «laws» of
human behavior, such as the Law of the Few, the Law of Stickiness, and the Law of Context.
There is nothing wrong in principle
with examining
human behavior in market transactions in some separation from
human behavior in political or religious activities.
The essence of
human behavior is the interaction through which one individual exchanges information
with one or more other individuals. . . .
In order to explain
human behavior more adequately Sullivan found it necessary to replace what he called Freud's «mechanism»
with his own concept of «dynamism.»
Us pagans believe we are endowed
with reason which allows us to judge whether or not someone can be trusted to deliver on their promises, if they are dangerous, or harmful — by watching their
behavior - We judge — not some other being upstairs - Obama has shown his lack of
human compassion and untruthfulness for 4 years, we have seen that his God is re-election money and that is at who's feet he worships.
: An Essay in Whitehead's Metaphysics,» does not bring the Whiteheadian account of deity into direct contact
with particular, concrete historical or individual experience.1 Williams affirms that the specific metaphysical functions ascribed to God by Whitehead «involve the assertion that God makes a specific and observable difference in the
behavior of things» (page 178) and goes on to remark that «Verification [of God's specific causality] must take the form of observable results in cosmic history, in
human history, and in personal experience» (page 179).
Carey proposes that
human behavior be considered as a text,
with the task of the researcher being to construct a «reading» of the text.
Theoretically, there should be no competition between professionals trained in religion and those trained in psychotherapy, for «the hitherto existing chasm between religion and psychology is somewhat unusual because... both concern themselves
with human nature and
behavior.»
The best way to bring the sinfulness of such sins home to us is to point toward the places where
humans in fact act wrongly: in home, school, business, contacts
with others, and the like, where by pride, self - seeking, neglect of our neighbors, ugliness of
behavior in our homes, and so much else, we often behave in a reprehensible manner or we subtly and insidiously treat other persons as mere «things.»
the preoccupation of the psychologist
with purely
human behavior, its description, and development; the preoccupation of the sociologist and cultural anthropologist
with the forms and development of society, make these mental health professionals unable to define the function of the churchman, though their professions may well be of immense importance in providing information when the clergyman thinks through his unique and necessary role as pastor to persons.
It is interesting to note that when the rules governing
human behavior are reduced by the Hebrew people to the number of ten, no fewer than two of the ten have to do
with human speech.
Likewise, some of the «unconverted,» perhaps particularly among those
with strong religious convictions, may yet be moved by more idealistic arguments for a different sense of what
human life as such deserves, the horror of a particular individual's
behavior notwithstanding.
Practically every area of
human knowledge and
behavior may find itself faced
with problems created by mistaken notions of location.
«Religion» has to do
with human beliefs and
behaviors that are as riddled
with nonsense as any other
human enterprise.
It does not reflect prevailing patterns of
human behavior... If you look around carefully, you will see that most people are not really maximizers, but instead what you might call «satisfiers»: they want to satisfy their needs, and that means being in equilibrium
with oneself,
with other people,
with society and
with nature.
The Penguin History of Economics defines economics as «a science which studies
human behavior as a relationship between ends and scarce means
with alternative uses».
The latter is concerned primarily
with a mere fragment of
human behavior, our «economic» actions, those which can be quantified in terms of money.
Some of the specific stimuli of my sober reflections have been the histories of the fiendishly diverse injustices, cruelties, tyrannies and butcheries
human beings have inflicted on one another — in particular the long, appalling story of Jewish suffering at the hands of Christian Europe
with its insane climax under the Nazis; Camus's searing reflections on our blood - soaked century; accounts of the horrors of plagues and epidemics at whose complete mercy
human beings for so long existed; and insights of depth psychology into the character and influence of the unconscious, childhood and repression in our
behavior.
We certainly can't explain our strange and wonderful
human behavior with our Lockean and Cartesian theory.
It deals
with only one segment of
human behavior, and a pattern of
behavior that applies to some but not all of us.
Or is the way of Ivan and his theological rebellion one of holding to God for fear of annihilation, but hating him and his world, and
with equal passion asserting the reality of a
human freedom that he denies by his quixotic
behavior at the time of the trial?