The Cook et al study aimed to show the extent of (qualitative and quantitative) agreement
with human causation of warming.
Not exact matches
Confusing correlations
with causations represents one of the most common
human errors of logic.
Final
causation is concerned
with one aspect of the subjective side of entities, be they
humans or electrons.
I am not suggesting that Griffin begins
with all that he wants to save in the way of
human consciousness, mental
causation, and free agency.
However, the strong evidence that supports the climate science and
human causation of climate change doesn't warrant equal weight
with minority claims, often disputed by other research, that are not credible, they add.
And (2)
with regard to its main rationale, carbon emissions cause warming, the vector of
causation is backwards: atmospheric CO2 concentration follows global warming, empirically and theoretically, while
human emissions are lost in the noise.
This question, following up on question one, is designed to expose the fact that there is a strong ethical duty to assume
human causation of climate change if there is reliable evidence of
human causation and that those who seek to justify non-action on climate change because they claim that
human causation has not been proven have a very strong ethical duty to demonstrate that
humans are not causing climate change
with high levels of proof.
By attacking the level of certainty that people may hold
with regard to either the existence of or
human causation of global warming, climate change denial has attractions for those outside the inner circle of beneficiaries from the fossil fuel industry who do not want to reckon
with either changes in their own lifestyle or
with the increased role of government required by effective climate action.
If it is true that correlation =
causation, then stork populations really do increase
with human populations.
Causation is a little mental trick we
humans came up
with to prevent bad things from happening.