Sentences with phrase «with international tribunals»

He is properly indignant at this abandonment of long - standing commitments: «In two centuries of national existence no more pusillanimous act was ever contemplated, much less carried forward, by American officials responsible for our relations with international tribunals.»

Not exact matches

Even if international tribunals, especially the ICC, were to meet with greater success in arresting arch-human-rights violators, deterring future violators, and bolstering the rule of law, they would remain morally unsatisfying as a response to massive evil.

This would remove the necessity for national vengeance against Iraqi officials; they would be dealt with under international law by an impartial tribunal.

If necessary, replace it with «violates X», «actionable in international tribunal Y» or as otherwise appropriate.

Fleeting between London and Beirut, the Jordanian artist is fixated with the politics of sound and its constructs, with his work often entering governmental and legal spheres such as the UK asylum tribunal and Defence for Children International.

Noteworthy, the G77 got language reinserted into the COP21 draft in Bonn last week that again calls for an international «climate justice tribunal» with apparent enforcement powers over developed but not developing countries.

Renco has sued Peru before an international investment tribunal, seeking $ 800 million in damages for the cost of complying with Peru's environmental and mining laws.

First, with regard to the judicial avenues foreign investors have against host - states, three come to mind: (a) bringing a claim before an investor - state tribunal; (b) bringing a claim before a domestic court, based on domestic and / or international standards of protection; and (c) private commercial arbitration based on a contract between the investor and the host ‑ State.

With an active trial practice, Carter has litigated in both state and federal courts as well as before the American Arbitration Association (AAA) and international arbitration tribunals, such as the ICC.

Helping to align investment arbitration with the functioning and the results of other systems of public law adjudication can contribute to forming an emerging consensus on the many contested issues in international investment law and afford legitimacy to the dispute settlement activity of investor - State arbitral tribunals.

Whether unlawful & whether tribunal compliant with ECHR, Art 6, EU Charter, Art 47; whether panel member a de facto judge or whether de facto judge principle unlawful by virtue of Art 14 of the International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights.

His Lordship emphasised the importance of upholding party choice vis - à - vis the arbitral process — irrespective of the fact that no party has any choice about whether to arbitrate, let alone decide the composition of the tribunal, when they contract with CSAT; some explain this on the basis that CSAT is a special case, being a tribunal of an international organisation.

The term of legal autonomy comprises thus for Gragl four «imperatives» that the Court has developed, with the consequence of some serious constraints imposed by the CJEU under its vigilant protection of legal autonomy on Member States choice and utilization of other international courts and tribunals and on the jurisdiction of such courts and tribunals (p. 84).

Chapter 4 turns to the impact of the somewhat «isolationist» approach found in the Court's case law on international law; it does so by scrutinizing the relationship of the CJEU with a number of other international courts and tribunals, recalling for this purpose in particular the MOX plant controversy and the legal controversy surrounding the creation of the European Economic Area and the EFTA Court.

Beyond child custody, other legal issues with potential international or comparative components concern the legal status of marriage or divorce, or the enforceability of domestic relations orders by foreign tribunals.

While creating a regional or international standing tribunal appears to deal with some of the problems encountered with BITs, critics point out that there are still downsides.

Indeed, when an international tribunal such as the present one is created, it must be endowed with primacy over national courts.

The Clinic represents clients in litigation before international, foreign, and domestic tribunals, and collaborates with organizational partners on human rights advocacy campaigns, documentation projects, legislative advocacy, report - writing, and research.

While the Human Rights Committee has not determined that «extraordinary» tribunals or «special» courts are incompatible with the requirement that tribunals be established by law, it has taken the position that the provision is intended to ensure that any court, be it «extraordinary» or not, should genuinely afford the accused the full guarantees of fair trial set out in Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Vaughan Lowe is a practising Barrister at Essex Court Chambers, mainly in the field of international law, with cases in the International Court of Justice, the ECJ, the ECHR, the ITLOS, the Iran - US Claims Tribunal, ad hoc Arbitral Tribunals and courts in England and Hong Kong, international law, with cases in the International Court of Justice, the ECJ, the ECHR, the ITLOS, the Iran - US Claims Tribunal, ad hoc Arbitral Tribunals and courts in England and Hong Kong, International Court of Justice, the ECJ, the ECHR, the ITLOS, the Iran - US Claims Tribunal, ad hoc Arbitral Tribunals and courts in England and Hong Kong, among others.

He acts for a range of local and international corporations as well as UAE government entities with a specialist focus on arbitration and all types of commercial and rental disputes before courts and tribunals.

Diego Cadena is an Ecuadorian lawyer with the international arbitration and litigation group in Washington, D.C.. His practice focuses on comparative law and international dispute resolution, especially in cases involving the representation of clients before the International Court of Justice in The Hague (ICJ), the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) among other internationinternational arbitration and litigation group in Washington, D.C.. His practice focuses on comparative law and international dispute resolution, especially in cases involving the representation of clients before the International Court of Justice in The Hague (ICJ), the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) among other internationinternational dispute resolution, especially in cases involving the representation of clients before the International Court of Justice in The Hague (ICJ), the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) among other internationInternational Court of Justice in The Hague (ICJ), the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) among other internationInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) among other internationInternational Chamber of Commerce (ICC) among other internationalinternational tribunals.

He is regularly instructed by Governments in international cases and has appeared before numerous international tribunals including the International Court of Justice and Tribunals constituted with respect to the Lainternational cases and has appeared before numerous international tribunals including the International Court of Justice and Tribunals constituted with respect to the Lainternational tribunals including the International Court of Justice and Tribunals constituted with respect to the Law oftribunals including the International Court of Justice and Tribunals constituted with respect to the LaInternational Court of Justice and Tribunals constituted with respect to the Law ofTribunals constituted with respect to the Law of the Sea.

(a) In Rakna Arakshaka Lanka Ltd v Avant Garde Maritime Services (Private) Limited [2018] SGHC 78 («Rakna Arakshaka»), the Singapore High Court held that where a tribunal had ruled on its own jurisdiction as a preliminary question, the party wishing to challenge the tribunal's jurisdiction had to bring that issue to the supervisory court within 30 days of receipt of notice of the tribunal's ruling, pursuant to Article 16 (3) of the UNCITRAL Model Law («Model Law «-RRB-, read with section 10 (3) of the International Arbitration Act («IAA «-RRB-.

Hadef & Partners» local law capability means it can combine an ability to appear before UAE courts with the expertise and experience needed to represent clients in international arbitrations, DIFC court disputes and special tribunals.

Representing Italy in a dispute with India before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and an arbitral tribunal constituted under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea concerning which of them has criminal jurisdiction over two Italian marines accused of wrongdoing off the coast of India.

«FAs recognition of the value of patents has increased dramatically over the past decade, so too has the amount of litigation associated with patent enforcement and validity challenges before U.S. district courts, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC), and before the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) In response to this ramp up, both in terms of volume and complexity, tribunals have come to recognize the substantive, procedural, and administrative challenges posed by patent litigation.

The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators conference on 13 November 2016 opened the week with a keynote address by Vincent Moran QC of Keating Chambers on «Turbulent and troublesome tribunals and the appearance of bias» and panel discussion on «What makes an effective and efficient seat in international arbitration?».

The tribunal found that Venezuela had breached its international obligations with regard to the company's flour production business and ordered the country to pay nearly half a billion...

The conference will take up such issues as the nature of domestic and international crimes committed; which high - level Bush officials, including Federal judges and Members of Congress, are chargeable with war crimes; which foreign and domestic tribunals can be used to prosecute them; and the setting up of an umbrella coordinating committee with representatives of legal groups concerned about the war crimes such as the Center for Constitutional Rights, ACLU, among others.

A court may not recognize a foreign - country judgment if: the judgment was rendered under a judicial system that does not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with the requirements of due process of law, as determined by the court using standards developed by the American Law Institute and the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law to govern resolution of transnational disputes; the foreign court did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant; or the foreign court did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Implicitly, the Committee seems to embrace the so - called «theory of consubstantiality», which advocates that even if nominally the domestic tribunals assert the application of municipal law, the only thing that actually matters is whether the content of the applicable norm effectuates a solution in accordance with international law.

(a) the guarantees of equality before the law and racial non-discrimination [34] in article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights («ICCPR») and articles 2 and 5 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination («CERD»), in particular the obligation in article 5 of CERD to prohibit and to eliminate racial discrimination and to guarantee the right of everyone to equality before the law, including in the enjoyment of (a) the right to equal treatment before the tribunals and all other organs administering justice, (d)(v) the right to own property alone as well as in association with others [35], and (d)(vii) the right to freedom of religion [36];