Sentences with phrase «with joint custody arrangements»

Have you had problems with joint custody arrangements?
One parent's decision to relocate can interfere with joint custody arrangements.
Parents also reported higher satisfaction with joint custody arrangements, and parents who were ordered to pay child support were more likely to do so when they shared custody of their children.
Being away from your kids in order to comply with a joint custody arrangement allows you to see the bigger picture, that your kids are indeed thriving and that the time they're spending with your ex is good for them.
However, often parents do not have the best communication with each other after a separation and communication sometimes gets worse with a joint custody arrangement.
With a joint custody arrangement, parents share legal custody, which means that both parents have the right to make decisions regarding the child's upbringing.
However, often parents do not have the best communication with each other after a separation and communication sometimes gets worse with a joint custody arrangement.

Not exact matches

Depending on how you arrived at sharing joint physical custody with your ex, you may not be thinking about the «rewards» of this child custody arrangement has to offer.
Idaho courts begin custody proceedings with an evaluation as to whether a joint custody arrangement is workable based in part on an estimation of parents» abilities to work together.
A Joint Parenting Agreement will also have a mediation clause, which orders parents to mediate all disputes with regards to the joint custody arrangeJoint Parenting Agreement will also have a mediation clause, which orders parents to mediate all disputes with regards to the joint custody arrangejoint custody arrangement.
Joint child custody is often a «forced» arrangement, meaning that the courts believe that children benefit the most from spending a substantial and continuous amount of time with both parents.
In a joint custody arrangement, the children reside with both parents.
Therefore, in a joint custody arrangement, it is important to present a unified front with children as it will not be good for a child to believe he / she can use one parent against the other.
(8) Is joint custody in accord with the child's wishes and does he or she not have strong opposition to such an arrangement?
In the past, true «joint physical custody» arrangements were more common, in which the child lived with each parent roughly half the time.
Such interim orders contained provisions stating that the plaintiff and the defendant shall have interim joint custody and guardianship, that the primary address of the children shall be the defendant's address, that for the purpose of access arrangements the plaintiff shall promptly inform the defendant of her monthly work schedule, and the defendant shall make efforts to ensure the children spend equal time with both the plaintiff and the defendant and, upon receipt of such work schedule, draw a calendar setting out parenting time for each parent for the coming month, and that the plaintiff shall be allowed to travel to Japan with the children from November 2, 2002 through November 18, 2002.
Joint custody is an arrangement whereby both time with the child and decision - making regarding the child is shared by both parents.
In T.K. the Court of Appeal recognizes that it is more problematic to extend «respect» to the stated reasons for a move in cases where there has been no previous determination with respect to custody, or where there is a pre-existing joint custody order or de facto joint custody / shared residency arrangement.
After considering the jurisprudence with respect to the double - bind question, the Court found that the risk of it resulting in a presumptive disposition may be greater where a joint custody or shared residency arrangement requiring both parents to reside in the same locale is in the best interests of the child.
If your custody agreement is a joint custody arrangement with a primary residential parent, the primary residential parent will most likely receive child support.
Joint physical custody is a shared physical custody arrangement of the children, where the intention is that the children spend significant periods of time with each parent, such as alternating weeks between mother and father.
If your shared physical custody or joint legal custody arrangement isn't working out post-divorce, you can file a motion with the court to change it.
Absent a joint custody agreement by the parents that includes an unequal physical custody arrangement, a judge is now required to order joint custody with an equal amount of parenting time, regardless of where the parent lives, unless one parent is ruled to be unfit.
However, most states define joint physical custody as any parenting time arrangement where both parents have significant overnights with the child.
However, Texas courts prefer joint custody arrangements so the child maintains a meaningful relationship with both parents.
In comparison to children in sole custody arrangements, children in joint custody arrangements who spend at least 35 percent of their time with each of their parents enjoy the following benefits:
The court may order sole legal custody with shared physical custody, joint legal custody with sole physical custody or make other custody arrangements.
Suntan12 - While I agree that both parents should have joint custody of the child there can be problems with that arrangement as well.
The specific arrangements depend entirely on the best interests of the child, but joint physical custody always means that each parent gets substantial time with the child rather than just a few days of visitation.
[ANONYMOUS LISTSERVE COMMENT]: «The recommendation involved a joint physical custody arrangement with an odd contingency... if the mother didn't agree with the recommendation, then the father would automatically get primary residential custody... this was after the evaluator had outlined numerous reasons why the mother had serious concerns about the father having primary custody... it appeared that the evaluator had set up the mother to agree to a plan that she had clearly not agreed to during the entire evaluation...» (Florida doctorate - level MHP, January 14, 2007).
In joint physical custody arrangements, parents share physical time with their child.
While this is more of a kidnapping case it can still happen in a joint custody arrangement in which the parent leaves the country with the child.
In many Western countries, an increasing number of children with separated parents live in a joint physical custody arrangement, that is, live equally (or close there to)... Continue reading →
Teachers and other third parties report that children in joint custody arrangements are better adjusted than children who only have visitation with their non-custodial parent.
The court may award one of three types of custody arrangements: joint legal custody to both parents, where one parent is responsible for residential custody; joint physical custody, where both parents provide homes for the child; or sole custody to one parent with visitation, also called «parenting time,» allowed to the non-custodial parent.
These cases hinge on whether the parties actually share physical custody of the child; a joint legal custody arrangement with one party acting as the primary physical custodian is not generally sufficient to invoke this higher standard of review.
Depending upon the arrangements, physical custody may be sole or joint, but sole custody with the mother is more the norm.
The most common custody arrangement involves the parties sharing joint legal custody, with one parent having residential custody of the child.
In joint legal custody arrangements, parents share equally in decision - making responsibility for a child but may not necessarily spend equal amounts of time with them.
That's where an experienced divorce mediator can help by providing you with sample parenting plans and worksheets to help you determine if joint custody or some other arrangement is practical in your particular situation.
In joint physical custody arrangements, parents share physical time with the child.
Children in a joint physical custody arrangement suffered from fewer psychosomatic problems than those living mostly or only with one parent but reported more symptoms than those in non-broken families.
The court stated that this concern with the nature of the parties» custodial arrangement was not dependent on the terms used by the parties to describe their arrangement as the terms of their agreement and the divorce judgment indicated that the parties only had joint legal custody.
In simplest of terms, joint physical custody is an arrangement in which both parents share equal rights in terms of time and contact with their children.
The parenting plan must identify both parents, identify the child or children subject to the plan, state whether both parents agree to the plan, identify a preference for sole custody or joint custody with respect to decision - making authority concerning various aspects of the child's life, and describe preferred visitation arrangements.
Joint custody arrangements do not necessarily require parents to split time with the child equally, and there are many joint custody options available to famiJoint custody arrangements do not necessarily require parents to split time with the child equally, and there are many joint custody options available to famijoint custody options available to families.
Joint physical custody is an arrangement in which parents each have extended periods of time with the children.
Both mothers and fathers may report lower levels of stress, greater satisfaction with their custody arrangement and better attachment to their children when engaged in joint custody arrangements.
It's primarily about economic well - being, but: «Children living with both biological parents reported higher levels of life satisfaction than children living with a single parent or parent / step - parent... Controlling perceived family affluence, the difference between joint physical custody families and single mother or mother / stepfather families became non-significant... [and] children in the Nordic countries characterised by strong welfare systems reported significantly higher levels of life satisfaction in all living arrangements except in single father households.
Martha Jacobson felt that the father should have joint custody, even though he had not asked for it, and even though she knew that he was planning to move 40 miles away to the next county right after the divorce, which would pose logistical problems with this kind of arrangement for a child in preschool or kindergarten.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z