Sentences with phrase «with judicial intervention»

The current annual workload is around 750,000 and rising; and fully 95 % of these are undefended, leading to the automated award of default judgment with no judicial intervention at all.

Not exact matches

As for US intervention with their government — countries tend to stay out of each other's internal affairs and specifically, other's judicial systems lest a diplomatic incident lead to war.

The U.S. Supreme Court confronted the hard - edged politics of electoral redistricting, with justices divided over whether judicial intervention or allowing legislative majorities to manipulate maps posed a greater threat to democracy.

Speaking to Citi News, lawyer Bediatuo noted, «whenever there is judicial intervention of this kind it helps everybody,» and he expressed hope «that the police would cooperate with citizens who want to express themselves and to exercise their constitutional rights.»

This underlying narrative is reflected in the structure of the book, which begins with the most basic of questions about the nature of judicial review (described as the keys to understanding what the court is doing), before moving on to parameters of judicial review (further dominant themes shaping the law and practice) and grounds for judicial review (public law wrongs justifying the court's intervention).

Instead, the impression one gets, especially from Lord Reid's speech, is that there is now a list of nullifying errors, a list of reasons for judicial intervention in respect of unlawful administrative decisions, with no area of administrative action walled off from judicial oversight.

The scrapping of employment tribunal fees has been described as the «most significant judicial intervention in the history of British employment law» — a statement I would agree with; it's going to make a huge difference and employers need to be prepared.

Its other recommendations include: greater judicial case management, with specialist judges and early intervention; agreement on circumstances in which parties might lose costs protection; drawing up realistic budgets; and allowing the courts to continue to exercise cost - capping powers.

Is There Too Much Judicial Intervention in Civil Litigation, Law Times, June 23, 2014 (co-author with Keith Landy)

The concept of jurisdictional error, with its teaching that on some matters an administrative decision - maker must be correct or face judicial intervention, has usually been at the eye of the storm.

As noted by Mr. Justice Edwards in E.G. v. F.B.G., 2004 BCSC 564, courts must be cautious in replacing a workable custody arrangement contained in a separation agreement with a court - imposed custody order in the absence of evidence justifying judicial intervention.

Consistent with Weatherford, earlier decisions had demonstrated a reluctance to allow 3rd parties to «interfere» during prosecution by seeking judicial intervention at the time (as opposed to retroactively / post issuance as in Weatherford).

Judicial responses to alienation include: ordering an assessment; ordering supervised access on a permanent basis; intervention in the early stages of the dispute, before the problem has had time to become «true» alienation, or in the early years of a child's development; changing custody on a temporary basis; determining whether «pure» or «mixed» alienation is taking place; keeping the courts involved; suggesting counselling; making a finding of contempt; making a no - contact order; involving the Children's Aid Society; not making a parallel parenting order; meeting with the children; and in extreme cases, putting the alienating parent's actions on court record, in hopes that if the child revisits the issue as an adult, they may be able to see what actually took place.

The Guidelines are intended as a best practice guide for therapists, attorneys, other professionals and judicial officers when there is a need for therapeutic interventions with court - involved children or parents.