Sentences with phrase «with judicial rulings»

Federal agencies will need to consider not only the privacy interests of the subject of the protected health information in the record requested, but also, when appropriate, those of a deceased individual's family consistent with judicial rulings.

«Legislators are free to disagree with judicial rulings, but punishing judges in a partisan manner for making valid rulings is not acceptable.»

Not exact matches

These risks and uncertainties include competition and other economic conditions including fragmentation of the media landscape and competition from other media alternatives; changes in advertising demand, circulation levels and audience shares; the Company's ability to develop and grow its online businesses; the Company's reliance on revenue from printing and distributing third - party publications; changes in newsprint prices; macroeconomic trends and conditions; the Company's ability to adapt to technological changes; the Company's ability to realize benefits or synergies from acquisitions or divestitures or to operate its businesses effectively following acquisitions or divestitures; the Company's success in implementing expense mitigation efforts; the Company's reliance on third - party vendors for various services; adverse results from litigation, governmental investigations or tax - related proceedings or audits; the Company's ability to attract and retain employees; the Company's ability to satisfy pension and other postretirement employee benefit obligations; changes in accounting standards; the effect of labor strikes, lockouts and labor negotiations; regulatory and judicial rulings; the Company's indebtedness and ability to comply with debt covenants applicable to its debt facilities; the Company's ability to satisfy future capital and liquidity requirements; the Company's ability to access the credit and capital markets at the times and in the amounts needed and on acceptable terms; and other events beyond the Company's control that may result in unexpected adverse operating results.

This summary is based on the Code, U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, rulings and other administrative pronouncements issued by the IRS, and judicial decisions, all as in effect on the date of this information statement, and all of which are subject to differing interpretation and change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect.

The aftermath of these votes is the absence of reception by the church's ministers and members, and an ecclesial landscape littered with continuing legislative maneuvers, invocation of parliamentary rules, judicial appeals, trials in church courts, and the departures of congregations and ministers.

Mayor Barry's alliance with Farrakhan was but the latest episode in the series of Reichstag fire incidents that began with the fraudulent claims of Tawana Brawley and have escalated since, in which the normal processes of the judicial system are converted by leftwing racists and black «nationalists» into their standard morality play about oppressive Amerikkka ruled by white devils and in need of liberation.

For Rule 7 of the Code of Conduct provides that «Where a Judge commits a breach of any rule of this Code he shall be sanctioned with reference to the gravity of the act or omission constituting the breach in accordance with the Judicial Service Regulations.&raRule 7 of the Code of Conduct provides that «Where a Judge commits a breach of any rule of this Code he shall be sanctioned with reference to the gravity of the act or omission constituting the breach in accordance with the Judicial Service Regulations.&rarule of this Code he shall be sanctioned with reference to the gravity of the act or omission constituting the breach in accordance with the Judicial Service Regulations.»

Or has the Senate changed the rules without officially changing the written rules, like they did with judicial filibusters?

The Code of Conduct further provides in Rule 5 (B) that a judge may engage in «avocational activities», that is «activities to improve the law, the legal system, and the administration of justice if such avocational activities do not detract from the dignity of his office or interfere with the performance of his judicial duties».

In the last years, EU have faced several cases of countries with judicial independence issues and I am wondering if there is a connection between party in power ideology and judicial independence / rule of law issues.

Judicial review underpins the rule of law and is central to our constitutional make - up, in which parliament sets out the laws, public bodies implement them and courts make sure that this implementation complies with the law.

«We will continue, perform, and strengthen our constitutional rule in accordance with the well - known principles of judicial integrity,» she added.

The tribunal, in its ruling, agreed with the argument of Justice Ngwuta that, as a serving Justice of the Supreme Court, he could not be tried in any court or tribunal, except after he had been subjected to the investigatory and disciplinary processes of the National Judicial Council (NJC).

In a terse, five - page ruling on Wednesday, the Second Judicial Department Appeals Court agreed with the defense lawyers, saying the Brooklyn district attorney's office had indeed failed to turn over crucial evidence and had never corrected «the knowingly false or mistaken material testimony of a prosecution witness.»

Here he was in 2005, pleading with Senate Republicans to change the rules to forbid judicial filibusters:

Except where excluded by law, any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be finally settled in accordance with the Comprehensive Arbitration Rules of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service, Inc. («JAMS») by three arbitrators appointed in accordance with such Rules.

In a state known for judicial activism, and with the trial judge calling for more money for schools, the high court's February 15 ruling was rather stunning.

The judicial review hearing on Tuesday in the high court in London is scheduled to last one day, with a ruling expected within a few months.

The Department for Education (DfE) has said it disagrees with «some aspects» of the court's decision last month to rule against education secretary Nicky Morgan in a judicial review brought by six parents, but has not said which.

Contrast the Louisiana and Georgia judicial experiences with Indiana where the state Supreme Court ruled unanimously — the vote was 5 - 0 — in April that public tax dollars could be used to fund private school tuition.

(c) As to transactions entered into after May 20, 1996, a creditor shall have no liability under this chapter for any act or practice done or omitted in conformity with any (i) regulation of the administrator, or (ii) any rule, regulation, interpretation, or approval of any applicable Alabama or federal agency or any opinion of the Attorney General, notwithstanding that after such act or omission has occurred, the regulation, rule, interpretation, opinion, or approval is amended, rescinded, or determined by judicial or other authority to be invalid for any reason; provided, however, that any interpretation or opinion issued after May 20, 1996, shall not have any effect on any litigation pending on May 20, 1996, nor shall any interpretation or opinion issued after May 20, 1996, have any effect on litigation if issued subsequent to filing of the litigation.

Only to the extent permitted by Rule 14d - 10 (b)(2), the Offer will exclude all holders of Shares in a U.S. state where Purchaser is prohibited from making the Offer by administrative or judicial action pursuant to a state statute after a good faith effort by Purchaser to comply with such statute.

The AVMA Judicial Council can take action up to, and including, dismissal from the AVMA in accordance with the AVMA's Rules of Disciplinary Procedures...

Siding with four teenage plaintiffs and the environmental groups that backed them, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on Tuesday ruled that the state has failed to fulfill its legal obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Both were ruled by state regulators to be beneficial for Massachusetts ratepayers, but the project is overcoming court hurdles, with A D.C. appeals court case, a case before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and a third in a federal district court remaining.

As I noted then at my Media Law blog, the rule came under fire most recently when one - time Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney condemned his own judicial appointee for her release of Daniel Tavares, who was charged with shooting a Washington couple in November.

Florida lawyers have been trying to get the Florida Bar's Rules of Judicial Administration Committee to pass a rule change that would require judges to grant continuances, with no success.

The number of law school courses offered in judicial opinion writing has increased, 1 along with the total number of elective courses in legal writing.2 The growth of judicial opinion writing courses, in particular, may be due to the rise in popularity of judicial externships.3 Several schools have added a classroom component to externships in response to rules of the American Association of Law Schools (AALS) 4 and the American Bar Association (ABA).5

With respect to judicial interpretation, therefore, while the national legal traditions on which the articles and rules in question are modeled can provide some guidance, over-reliance on a narrow inquiry can lead to the perpetuation of the default position, according to which, as Byrne («The new public international lawyer and the hidden art of international criminal trial practice», 25 Connecticut Journal of Int» l Law (2005) 243) notes, some international judges «interpret legal norms through the lexicons of their respective traditions», rather than through a truly sui generis prism.

The fatality of this misstep would have been reasonably evident to any lawyer familiar with the Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010 and case law governing judicial review.

Thus, in our system, evidentiary rulings provide the context in which the judicial process of inclusion and exclusion approves some conduct as comporting with constitutional guarantees and disapproves other actions by state agents.

Exercising the profession as a Supreme Court lawyer gives me the opportunity to confront with the highest judicial body, entrusted with the role of guaranteeing uniformity at national level in the interpretation and application of the rules that form the Italian legal system.

In California, the rule states, «It is the duty of an attorney... to employ, for the purpose of maintaining the causes confided to him or her those means only as are consistent with the truth, and never to mislead the judge or any judicial officer by an artifice or false statement of fact or law.»

As you can see, social media and social media content raise serious issues for the judiciary, with regards to independence, integrity and ethical standards, admissibility of evidence, the availability of ex parte information, the extent of judicial notice, practice rules, the right to a fair trial and juror conduct.

«Confidentiality in the mediation process is important and this Directive should therefore provide for a minimum degree of compatibility of civil procedural rules with regard to how to protect the confidentiality of mediation in any subsequent civil and commercial judicial proceedings or arbitration.»

Provides information to practitioners, jurists, and the public about the law governing the awarding of attorney fees and costs with a focus on California state law and rulings coming from California federal judicial forums.

The process used to identify partial fingerprints is sufficiently reliable to allow courts to admit expert testimony regarding the matching of a partial (or «latent») impression with a full fingerprint, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled today.

The Supreme Judicial Court ruled, under the Insurance Liquidation Act, G.L. c. 175, § § 180A - 180L, that the term «policyholders» is limited to parties with in - force policies at the time of the appointment of the receiver.

The Model Penal Code: Sentencing project provides guidance on some of the most important issues that courts, corrections systems, and policymakers are facing today, including the general purposes of the sentencing system; rules governing sentence severity — including sentences of incarceration, community supervision, and economic penalties; the elimination of mandatory minimum penalties; mechanisms for combating racial and ethnic disparities in punishment; instruments of prison population control; victims» rights in the sentencing process; the sentencing of juvenile offenders in adult courts; the creation of judicial powers to review many collateral consequences of conviction; and many issues having to do with judicial sentencing discretion, sentencing commissions, sentencing guidelines, and appellate sentence review.

The court's procedural rules, as well as judicial resistance to the idea of rewarding aggressive litigation with monetary bonanzas, have historically limited the amounts recoverable under these doctrines.

However Federal Court Justice Mosley, in his judicial review of the Judicial Council, ruled that the role of Independent Counsel was inconsistent with the creation of a solicitor - client relationship with the judicial review of the Judicial Council, ruled that the role of Independent Counsel was inconsistent with the creation of a solicitor - client relationship with the Judicial Council, ruled that the role of Independent Counsel was inconsistent with the creation of a solicitor - client relationship with the Council.

In a particularly exalted mood, the Court has held that «the very existence of effective judicial review designed to ensure compliance with EU law is of the essence of the rule of law.»

Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses thus advances the proposition that Member States are to set up all bodies that may potentially rule on a matter «covered by EU law» (whatever else they do, or however rare the occasion may be that they actually have to have anything to do with EU law) as bona fide «courts and tribunals» safely tucked into the EU judicial hierarchy.

Tagged with: Charter of Rights and Freedoms constitutional law constitutional supremacy constraint judicial restraint legal philosophy original intent original meaning rule of law section 7

Because it seems so evident that this judge is unwilling to follow the rules and has a hostility against you to the point of threatening to hold you in contempt simply because you are asking her to follow the rules on your motions, you have the right to file a complaint against this judge with the state supreme court judicial commission.

«By continuing to demand that the commission provide him with copies of their rulings in specific cases, the governor is continuing to improperly interject himself into judicial proceedings to control the outcome,» Kathryn Williams, Monaco's attorney, said in a statement.

The reasons: (1) implied contractual indemnity — individual brokers were not parties to the listing agreement with sellers (only the bankrupt brokerage business was a party); and (2) equitable indemnity — although brokers were jointly and severally liable with sellers as far as buyers» damages, this theory could not be used to create a new attorney fee exposure basis under the American Rule, or else the appellate court would be creating a new exception through judicial fiat.

although brokers were jointly and severally liable with sellers as far as buyers» damages, this theory could not be used to create a new attorney fee exposure basis under the American Rule, or else the appellate court would be creating a new exception through judicial fiat.

If the student understood how a judicial opinion was created, how legislation was produced, how administrative rules and regulations were made, then she could deal with these materials in any format.

Without such a further shift in culture of the kind engendered by Lord Woolf, coupled with adequate judicial resources and administrative support for the civil court system, it is difficult to see further rule changes alone achieving what Lord Woolf desired but which for large and complex claims his reforms failed ultimately to deliver.