Thank you for your permission to disagree
with junk science!
I can even better, thanks to Anthony Watts
with his junk science blog.
Al Gore's new movie, «An Inconvenient Sequel,» is riddled
with junk science and hysterical alarmism.
And a growing body of high - quality scholarly research finds that subsidies for efficiency cost twice as much as their benefits — a finding that NRDC and its allies actively seek to deny
with junk science.
This is a wonderful post and much needed in the blogosphere debate
with the junk science experts — thanks so much!
it's always hyperbole or speculation
with the junk science you adore.
Not exact matches
@awanderingscot, 1 I don't worship
science 2 I try very hard to avoid
junk / psuedo
science like YEC, homeopathy, psychics, etc. 3 what does any of that have to do
with my opinion.
Once we get to a point in this country where people like you aren't blasting people like me
with lies, misinformation,
junk science, and scriptural hypocrisy, then we'll talk.
Interesting discussion — Totally agree about the «punching above their weight» problem
with the current spate of «popular» atheists and
junk writers, as well as the «Hollywood» treatment of Pullman, but you don't need to wade through Pullman's trilogy to get a useful insight into institutionalism vs genuine spirituality — just pick up the excellent «The Dragon in the Sea» by Dune author Frank Herbert or «The Moon is a Harsh Mistress» by Robert Heinlien — great works from the Golden Age of
Science Fiction literature.
Our
science kits - I majored in physics in university, and the Walter Kraul
science kits that we carry from Germany are absolutely inspirational; they are about a hundred times better than any of the «Follow Step 1 -2-3» and discard a hunk - of -
junk in - a-flashy-box
science kits you'll find out there, as they offer dozens of different ways to explore and think about what you've built or what you're observing,
with excellent booklets
with probing questions, offering different levels of explanation or exploration, depending on the child.
Starting
with your commentary on research, it is important to not that there are many examples of
junk science in every medical field.
; subsisting on
junk food for the sake of
science; and putting to rest my debate
with a libertarian.
The American Statistical Association and other research groups have issued serious cautions about using test scores to measure teacher effectiveness,
with some concluding it is
junk science.»
But I have an expertise, I would say, in reading
science and spotting
junk science because that's what I do
with most of my time.
Advances in molecular genetics have propelled progress in fields that deal
with inherited diseases, cancer, personalized medicine, genetic counseling, the microbiome, diagnosis and discovery of viruses, taxonomy of species, genealogy, forensic
science, epigenetics,
junk DNA, gene therapy and gene editing.
As Michigan Tech made it clear they want nothing to do
with Heartland's
junk science, Harvard University again confirmed that career climate denier and Heartland contractor Willie Soon has no formal affiliation
with the school beyond office space on their campus.
«Policymakers, when confronted
with claims that sugar guidelines are based on «
junk science,» should consider whether «
junk food» was the [funding] source.»
Looks can often be deceiving, as RoboCop is, underneath the
junk cinema exterior, one of the more intelligent and savvy thrillers of the
science fiction genre, perhaps only bested by The Terminator in terms of blending intelligent, complex sci - fi
with all - out supercharged action.
So while the teachers keep barking up the tree that the teacher evaluations are
junk science, when will the teachers speak up
with the same loud voice in regards to the personal and private data that is being stolen from our kids within Smarter Balanced Assessments and included in CT's Statewide Longitudinal Data Base, and shared
with 3rd party vendors without parental consent?
This volume positions ongoing debates within the wider context of an education landscape struggling to displace
junk -
science ideology
with empirical research.
With no physical evidence, the prosecution's case was built on
junk science and the testimony of jailhouse snitches and convicts.
I wouldnt take my dogs off TOTW but if price is a concern, this is the same price as
junk Science Diet and Iams so youre much better off
with the 4Health for the money.
Cat Wars is, to anybody familiar
with the topic, an obviously desperate attempt to fuel the ongoing witch - hunt against outdoor cats «by any means necessary,» including the endorsement of discredited
junk science, an oceanful of red herrings, and B - movie - style scaremongering.
Building on Artists Space's history as an institution whose program has increasingly emphasized community participation and political organization (see last year's Decolonize This Place, which turned the gallery into a weekly activist meeting hub), Coop Fund foregoes traditional media like painting or sculpture in favor of video, art -
science hybrids, updated
junk sculpture, and institutional critique, making an implicit statement about these media that, for their associations
with high - modernist seriousness, are appropriate to a politically engaged exhibition.
Halfway between castaway
junk and
science apparatus, Han's new series of sculptures feature clinical glass jars bubbling
with tiny dye - filled bubbles.
With the significant funds made available by Exxon - Mobil and others for debunking what they call
junk science, you might think that some persuasive mechanistic theories and testable predictions would be forthcoming.
I am all for requisite restraint
with regard to political rhetoric also, but for someone
with next - to - no knowledge of the topic like me, your critiques of the «
Junk Science» found by mainstream pundits is probably the most valuable function your site provides.
Even people who don't agree
with me on everything and are somewhat of a skeptical bent should see some advantage in making common cause to get rid of the
junk science arguments being made by a lot of the skeptics.
Steve Milloy of
Junk Science is linking to O'Sullivan and identifying him as affiliated
with RFE / RL.
I should point out, however, that funding further study
with the likes of the the hockey team seems to be a complete waste, since it seems to produce results ranging from bias confirmation, at best, to
junk science, to outright corruption.
You can not bring yourself to admit that that paper is
junk science at its worst... because you agree
with it.
We're winning the information war, but the «Church of Global Warming» isn't giving up the ghost just yet and we need to keep countering the
junk science and hysteria
with facts and reason.
Often justified largely on the basis of
junk science they have come up
with such wonderful policy prescriptions as using only unreliable sources of energy because they are «sustainable,» keeping natural resources in the ground rather than using them to meet human needs, having government tell manufacturers what requirements their products must meet to use less energy rather than encouraging manufacturers to meet the needs of their customers, all in the name of «energy efficiency,» substituting government dictates for market solutions on any issue related to energy use, and teaching school children
junk science that happens to meet «environmentalists» ideological beliefs in hopes of perpetuating these beliefs to future generations even though they do not conform to the scientific method, the basis of
science.
«I am disappointed that a scientist like Judy would repeat what smacks of
junk science without even raising an eyebrow, and worse yet, proposing that a perfectly sound name be changed to «Tyndall effect» without bothering to check whether there is any substantive justification for this urban legend that originated
with Wood's parody of a physics experiment.»
Big Picture News — IPCC Watts Up
with That Climate Depot
Junk Science Climate Audit SEPP CO2
Science SPPIblog GlobalWarming.org TallBloke's Talkshop Greenie Watch JoNova Heartland.org/Wikipedia Fakegate NIPCC, Climate Change Reconsidered Climate change in Perspective, a tutorial for policy makers Left Exposed
I've discussed the subject
with family members that were at one point dead certain that AGW was «only a theory» and was wildly overstated if not «
junk science», but who grasped the relevant issues relatively quickly and revised their opinion as they went along.
Some
with reasonable
science, some
with a variety of sophistry and dishonest rhetoric, some
with a mixture of mis - understood «
science», blather, and nasty rhetorical
junk.
As much as I dislike James Hansen's activism based on
junk science, I have to admit that he understands the power issue, and agree
with his support for nuclear power as a way to maintain civilization.
But a half - century of distinguished service to climate
science - the directorships, the prizes, all the peer - reviewed papers, the shared platforms
with the great Dr Mann - is swept into the garbage can of history, and Bengtsson is now just another «denialist» peddling «
junk science.»
These uni-dimensional
junk science professors are confident in their intellectual abilities to continue getting away
with indulging in their idle speculations and spreading their flapdoodle about things that have proven to be untrue; and, they demand that we appoint them as elites to rule over the rest of us despite a complete absence of supporting evidence for their many predictions that have been falsified by real - world observations.
Climatology really is a
junk science like social science, political science, economics or Christan Science, requiring True Believers with no objectiviit
science like social
science, political science, economics or Christan Science, requiring True Believers with no objectiviit
science, political
science, economics or Christan Science, requiring True Believers with no objectiviit
science, economics or Christan
Science, requiring True Believers with no objectiviit
Science, requiring True Believers
with no objectiviity left.
Horner posed for a photo
with Marc Morano, Steve Milloy of
Junk Science, and Steven Goddard / Tony Heller at what appeared to be an event promoting Morano's new book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change, by Regnery Publishing.
Those who point out the problems of making arguments for policy on the back of PR stunts and
junk science are labelled as «sceptics» or «deniers», motivated by profit, «ideology» or simple bad - mindedness rather than the desire for a sensible debate about our relationship
with the natural environment and concern about development.
Similarly deceptive is an upcoming
junk study from a Koch - funded think tank that has taken on the format and appearance of a truly scientific report from the US Government, but is loaded
with lies and misrepresentation of actual climate change
science.
You're adding an interesting point but if Climate
Science was capable of monitoring its «
Science» would it have allowed the IPCC to gum - up the
Science with junk from Greenpeace, WWF advocacy, and politics?
And just this afternoon, Simon Singh — purported defender of free speech; enemy of
junk science — joined the ranks of those disgraceful hypocrites
with a message on Twitter.
Reading the reports that savage ethanol fuel, it's easy for anyone
with science or engineering background to spot
junk science.
Then there is the larger problem
with essay writer Hackney's conclusions about «unreliable
junk science funded by corporations»:
Otherwise, we
junk up the argument
with stuff that has nothing to do
with climate
science and it's use in proving CAGW warming in the future.
In climate change, there is a political agenda
with its necessary
junk science propaganda and alarmist claims.