Sentences with phrase «with less fuel consumption»

The TNGA - derived V6 develops more power with less fuel consumption than before.

Harvesting all wasted heat could eventually almost double ICE efficiency allowing a smaller cleaner engine with less fuel consumption.

This initial application of Mazda's SKYACTIV engine and transmission technologies — their first application in a production vehicle — will realize higher torque at low - and mid-range engine speeds resulting in better drivability with less fuel consumption in everyday driving.

The 3.5 - liter V6 engine delivers 301 hp with less fuel consumption.

Not exact matches

In theory, if a city or region has policies that encourage biking instead of driving, the researchers should be able to see the change in consumption patterns, with less car fuel consumed and fewer vehicles overall and a drop in consumption - based transport emissions, she said.

Turbine blades made out of materials with higher melting temperatures would require less fuel consumption and lead to lower CO2 emissions.

Most efficient is the less powerful engine with a stop / start system fitted; claimed fuel consumption is 67.3 mpg, while 95g / km CO2 emissions currently ensure UK road tax is free.

The Sonic was also unable to confidently trump the Swift in fuel consumption figures, with the Suzuki being largely more economical under duress, and only slightly less economical under regular driving — the Suzuki sipping 6.3 l / 100 km, whilst the effortless torque of the Chevrolet helped it to figures of 6.2 l / 100 km.

With the higher torque of a diesel and efficiency the fuel consumption would be less than gas

«The result of all these enhancements and advances is that the new Versa Sedan engine burns cleaner and uses less fuel, which combined with the improved CVT performance and better aerodynamics reduces overall fuel consumption by about five miles per gallon versus the 2011 Versa Sedan,» says Castignetti.

With the new weight - saving techniques, the new Range Rover Sport has a huge advantage over competitors, not because we don't like big cars, but because less weight means less fuel consumption.

These excelent data of fuel - saving belongs to the «EcoDynamics» version (starting at more less $ 12,000), that includes a series of specifics rules to reduce the consumption, with a intelligent stop and go system engine (Kia calls it ISG) low rolling resistance tyres, a drag - reducing front grille, gearshift indicator and rear spoiler.

In 2008, Volvo Cars will introduce a Volvo C30 1.6 - liter turbodiesel with fuel consumption of less than 4.5 l / 100 km (52.3 mpg US) and CO2 emissions below 120 g / km.

The reason for the move from six to four is efficiency, and the 2.0 L turbo delivers with NEDC fuel consumption of 6.9 litres per 100 km, a significant 1.0 litre per 100 km less.

Its the fuel saver 1.1 CRDi with 75 hp that consume only 3,2 liter / 100 km (at the moment, the internal combustion engine with less consumption and emissions sold in Europe).

At a curb weight of less than 2,200 kg, Lamborghini's team of designers and R&D engineers focused on weight reduction throughout the car's chassis, with an intelligent materials mix to ensure maximum stiffness for the best possible comfort and handling as well as lower fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

The 112TSI quotes a CO2 figure of 194g / km which, though about ballpark with most of its competitors (except the Skyactive Mazda CX - 5), is less impressive than the fuel consumption figure.

Even better, the Lexus LX 450d will save owners more money at the bowser with combined fuel consumption of 9.5 L / 100 km — significantly less than the LX 570's 14.4 L / 100 km.

8A / 12A switchable Level 1 charging cable CHAdeMO DC quick charge port Battery warming system MiEV remote system (pre-activated air conditioning, heater and timer battery charging) Approaching Vehicle Audio System (AVAS) for alerting pedestrians Charging Times: 3 22 hours for 8amp 14 hours for 12 amp 7 hours with 240V / 15A Level 2 charging system Less than 30 minutes to 80 % full with CHAdeMO Level 3 DC Quick Charger Driving Modes: «D» — allows maximum performance as it generates 100 % torque in direct response to accelerator input «ECO» — helps maximize energy usage («fuel economy») by slightly reducing overall power output to reduce the rate of battery consumption «B» — increases regenerative brake biasing to augment energy recycling (with 100 % of power production available)

This improves intake airflow volume and speed management - and, subsequently, combustion process management - to deliver more power for less fuel consumption, with reduced CO2 emissions.

In spite of these impressive performance figures, the average fuel consumption is less than 2.5 litres per 100 kilometres, with a CO2 emissions level of less than 60 g / km.

Fuel consumption is decent to if not exactly class - leading, with the manual transmission offering an average of 31 mpg and the automatic slightly less at 30 mpg.

Familiar from the 2012 CLS63 AMG this new engine can produce either 518 hp or 550 hp, together with an impressive reduction in fuel consumption — 22 percent less based on the European driving cycle.

Lubrication was enhanced with three oil jets dedicated to each cylinder, supporting better fuel economy, dynamic performance, less knocking, and less oil consumption.

New V8 bi-turbo engine in the S 560 Coupe and Cabriolet models Claimed to be one of the world's most ecomomical V8 petrol engines, the latest - generation bi-turbo V8 is said to consume 8 % less fuel than its predecessor (with average fuel consumption of around 35mpg in the Coupe and 34mpg in the Cabrio), thanks partially to active cylinder shutdown.

The PHEV version will be interesting with less weight, more internal space and less fuel consumption.

Fuel consumption is 21 city / 28 highway / 24 combined mpg with rear - wheel drive and 1 mpg less with all - wheel drive.

From today (July 1), the LCT threshold has increased from $ 61,884 to $ 63,184 (up $ 2300), while the threshold for vehicles with combined fuel consumption of less than 7.0 L / 100 km remains unchanged at $ 75,375.

Presented at the Frankfurt Motor Show in the autumn of 2009, the Mercedes Vision S 500 Plug - In Hybrid previewed the S 500 Plug - In Hybrid, the first luxury car with a fuel consumption less than 3 l / 100 km.

Despite this, the 208 GTi remains more frugal than most, with combined fuel consumption of just 5.9 L / 100 km — less than the Polo GTI (6.1 L / 100 km), Fiesta ST and Fabia RS (both 6.2 L / 100 km), and the DS3 DSport (6.7 L / 100 km).

In its 175hp trim, the engine is equipped with a particulate filter on the Privilège Carminat, Initiale and GT versions, making Laguna the ultimate compromise in terms of performance (0 - 100kph in less than 8.5 seconds), driving pleasure (360Nm from as low as 1,750 rpm), fuel consumption (5 litres / 100 km, extra-urban cycle) and comfort.

To express this in figures, the E 250 CDI with 150 kW / 204 hp and 500 newton metres develops a 25 percent higher torque than the previous V6 diesel engine, but uses around 23 percent less fuel at only 5.3 litres per 100 kilometres (combined NEDC consumption).

Efficient Dynamics focuses on three specific areas — weight, dynamics and consumption — with the intent of developing more power from less fuel in a lower - weight vehicle.

In combination with the diesel engine, the fuel consumption was less than 6 l / 100 km.

With less weight to lug around, fuel consumption is also reduced, and for even more economy a plug - in hybrid «e-tron» model with a diesel engine and electric motor may also be on the With less weight to lug around, fuel consumption is also reduced, and for even more economy a plug - in hybrid «e-tron» model with a diesel engine and electric motor may also be on the with a diesel engine and electric motor may also be on the way.

These extraordinary performance figures contrast with lower combined fuel consumption figures which, at 9.4 — 9.3 l / 100 km, are up to 1.1 l / 100 km less than that of the previous model (New European Driving Cycle or NEDC).

The efficient and very fun - to - drive system, with 335 kW (449 hp) combined system power, propels the CT6 from 0 - 100 km in 5.6 seconds; delivers an all - electric range of more than 60 km (37 miles) and an all - electric top speed of 125 km / h (78 mph); and features combined fuel consumption of less than 2.0 L / 100 km (117.7 mpg US).

The quest for better driveability combined with lower fuel consumption and less environmental impact has led to increased focus on internal friction inside the engine.

The diesel hybrid prototype delivered zippy 0 — 100 km / h acceleration of less than 8 seconds — but with fuel consumption of less than 4 - liters / 100 km (58.8 mpg)-- 25 % more fuel - efficient than the conventional diesel model with the same displacement engine.

Fuel consumption and CO2 emissions are 11 per cent lower than the old Gallardo's — the LP610 - 4 Coupe claims 22.6 mpg and 290g / km — but with such immense performance at your disposal, you can expect to achieve far less than that in the real world.

It reaches a maximum speed of 243 km / h and 125 km / h in electric mode, while the electric range is between 18 and 36 km and the fuel consumption is the same as Mercedes - Benz's (3.4 l / 100 km, 79 g / km CO2 emissions), with less power than the GLE.

Oil is especially useful due to its portability (I don't expect coal - burning cars to come on the market any time soon), so I wouldn't expect the drop in oil consumption to be made up for with other lesser fossil fuels.

I have also experimented with driving at 70km / hr on open roads with very little traffic, and found that fuel consumption per kilometre travelled is perhaps 20 % less than when travelling at 90km / hr.

Simply improving messaging in accordance with recommendations of psychologists or following the recommendations of economists to create economic incentives to engage in less GHG producing behavior will not likely create strong citizen support for climate change policies unless citizens better understand that the narrative created by opponents of climate change policies about high levels of scientific uncertainty and unacceptable harm to the economy from the adoption of climate policies is not only false but has been manufactured by fossil fuel companies and other entities which have economic interests in continuing high levels of fossil fuel consumption.

Just as I stated a few comments earlier with BaustinB, the WHOLE point of driving hybrid and alternative vehicles is to reduce pollution in addition to less consumption of fuel whether it be petroleum or electricity.