Sentences with phrase «with less profits»

If you do not want to go to cash and keep holding the stock, you may very well end up selling the stock at the wrong time with less profits and / or may not be able to take advantage of another undervalued opportunity in time.

i always exit early with lesser profits or close of an intending profitable market all because of panic.But afterwards the trade will continue in my direction.

However, some Redditors suggested that miners would wait for the price growth to compensate for their losses even if they have to operate some time with a lesser profit or with no profit at all, similar to gas and oil producers that do not shut down their operations because of the current decline of prices.

Posted by Jennifer on December 16, 2009 at 12:31 pm permalink Reply Having worked for a couple of the employers on the list, and having gone to do something with less profit more social focus, I beg to disagree.

Not exact matches

But with the price of bitcoin skyrocketing (at least on a monthly basis) and other currencies following suit, it's probably no surprise that some less legitimate folk have sought to profit from the boom.

Tech companies with no profits (or even much of a business plan) soared to extreme valuations that were justified, in part, by the belief that future profits would be made faster and that equities were less risky than in the past.

As inflation rises in tandem with economic growth, growth stocks» future potential profits look less enticing compared with the steady profits of value companies, many of which are in industries where they can pass their costs through to customers.

At least part of the reason is that GDP growth has less to do with corporate profits than you might expect.

According to a report on food franchising by Franchise Business Review, 51.5 percent of food franchises earn profits of less than $ 50,000 a year; roughly 7 percent top $ 250,000, with the average profit for all restaurants coming in at $ 82,033.

This year's awards are open to all Australian business women that meet the entry criteria in the following categories: * Westpac Group Business Owner Award (owners with a 50 per cent share or more in a business, with responsibility for key management decision making); * Australian Government Private and Corporate Sector Award (employees in the private and corporate sectors, or owners with less than a 50 per cent share of a business); * Hudson Community and Government Award (employees of government departments, statutory bodies and not - for - profit organisations); * Panasonic Young Business Women's Award (women aged 30 years and under, with any of the above criteria).

Wellard shares were hammered for a second time in less than a week, with the company warning of yet another potential profit hit before the end of the financial year.

Finding a distressed seller who needs immediate cash often means they will sell at less than market value, which provides you with biggest profit potential.

(Public or venture - backed companies with 50 % or less Canadian ownership will be judged by PROFIT on a case - by - case basis)

That makes you more conservative and while your growth is often slower, you stay in the game, learn to profit from various market inefficiencies and succeed far more, with far less stress, in the end.

But if you're serving a larger market and operate on miniscule profit margins, it might not be worth your time to optimize your site for keywords with less than 3,000 to 5,000 average monthly searches.

With manufacturing kits that retail for less than $ 1,000 a pop, MakerBot's nearly 3,000 initial orders have generated enough revenue to cover the company's overhead, pay its 22 employees» salaries, and turn a small profit for Pettis and his two co-founders, Zach Hoeken Smith and Adam Mayer.

This quarterly national survey, conducted in October by APCO Insight, polled for - profit U.S. companies with less than $ 10 million in annual revenue.

Beauty products giant Estee Lauder (EL) is expected to post second - quarter sales and profit that more or less line up with Wall Street's expectations this morning.

It usually requires an explanation on the order of infinite retention («yes, our sales and marketing costs are really high and our annual profit margins per user are thin, but we're going to keep the customer forever»), a massive reduction in costs («we're going to replace all our human labor with robots»), a claim that eventually the company can stop buying users («we acquire users for more than they're worth for now just to get the flywheel spinning»), or something even less plausible.

The facts are not right here, energy is cheap that means the cost of manufacturing and transporting of goods is low, food and consumers staples already more affordable, so what if a few American oil companies going out of business.the cost of producing oil in middle east is less than $ 10 / bl and we were paying more than $ 140 / bl for it, with that huge profit margin the big oil companies and oil producing nations became richer and the rest of us left behind, with the oil price this low the oil giants don't want to reduce the price at pump even a penny, because they are so greedy.worst case scenario is some CEOs bonuses might drop from $ 20 million to $ 15 millions I am sure they will survive.in terms of the stock market it always bounces back, after all it's just a casino like game.

If you're a short to intermediate - term swing trader of stocks, keep reading for juicy details that will put you on the path to greater trading profits with less risk.

Double your revenue and profit in less than three years with this step - by - step guide to enjoying the rollercoaster ride of growth.

These initiatives, along with similar moves in other markets, will likely weigh on profits at the outset, but Coke should ultimately emerge from this transition period as a higher - margin, less - capital intensive business.

In the case of call options the maximum profit is theoretically unlimited, while with put options the profit is limited to the share price less the premium of the options.

Assuming the exact same investments above, if you were to pay 20 % carry on each of your investments, despite not generating any profit, you would still have to pay the full $ 20K in carry on the one successful investment, and would therefore end up with less money than you started with, or $ 80K returned (probably less after other fees and expenses).

Owing to their recurring revenue model, assuming customers stay with the business, the profit in the future will expand significantly as the business matures and spends less on these items.

It's simple, with less fees and no other shareholders profiting, more money in our pockets!

As with any business venture, the promise of profits attracts some less - than - savoury characters.

When a product cost is in the $ 70 - 170 price range, it's large enough to make a reasonable profit per order without needing to service the sale with too many customer pre-sale questions or with a little less demand for more detailed content.

On the other hand — with reduced money to play will their will be less profits.

Its first - quarter net profit slumped by 79 percent, it replaced its CEO of less than three years, John Cryan, this month with new CEO Christian Sewing whose game plan revolves around «painful» cuts.

They usually coincide with periods where profits might temporarily be less (that's how the business cycle works, good years and bad years).

This trade tripled in value in less than 3 weeks, and if one had invested only $ 500 in it then they could have paid for their SK Options Trading subscription for the next 2 years with the profits.

Companies with solid balance sheets, that have better credit ratings and less debt - to - equity than peers, can weather economic downturns, make opportunistic acquisitions, waste less of their profit on debt interest, and easily absorb unexpected problems and keep moving forward.

The result of outsourcing is an improved quality of life for the farmer because they can focus more time on growing higher quality coffee and turning a higher profit with less physical labor.

Sixteen global food businesses are being asked by a team of investors to sell more plant - based protein and less meat, with a view to improving the health of people and planet... and their company profits.

This kind of thinking, along with superb food, has enabled Centeno's first effort as restaurateur to turn a profit in less than two months — this while opening in an edgy area of the city, in a struggling economy, in an industry with a 27 percent failure rate.

Positively impact your triple bottom line — people, planet and profit — with products that usually cost less than old - fashioned, harsh cleaners and sanitizers.

With the gaudy contract numbers we're seeing, the league's less fortunate franchises are going to feel nonplussed about small profits or breaking even.

Why should anyone buy the Grizzlies or the Hornets (currently held in ownership by the NBA) when neither team can make a profit, much less compete with the championship payrolls of the Lakers and the Celtics?

@Fatboy Gooner The Ozil deal was far less that 40 plus million as has been exposed on football leaks it was more in the region of 32 million with verious clauses that enable REM to take a percentage of any profit we make on selling Ozil and I would assume there are similar attachments with the Sanchez deal, even our record signings are clouded in smoke and mirrors so let not run away with the idea that its all SWengers fault, if your employer is on your back and pushing for results then you perform at a higher rate and push harder where as Wenger has no push from above so does nt go out of his way Kroenke does nt have the culture around him to win trophies cos thats not his aim and that filters down to the grass roots at Arsenal and shows in Wengers transfer policy and in the players performance.

Jonm; As a major share Holder no one can throw them out, but with no profit, from ECL TV revenue, less TV revenue from EPL, and class come player willing to come to Arsenal like last year Aubumeyang refused and Vardy snubbed, 2 years ago Suarez refused to come, pretty soon they are forced to sell and get out or buy and compete with big clubs like MU, MC, CHELSEA LIVERPOOL SPURS and even LEICESTER.

Yes we owe the banks around 230 million it's a long term loan we pay back around 25 million a year, this season 2014/15 we ar going to turn ower around 330 + million And our outgoing is going to be around 220 million or less, this season and the next 5 seasons we will be malikng around 110 million profit a year, we had 170million in the bank in April which was confirmed by the club we have spent some money on players 70 + million leaves you with 100 million in the bank then in June we recived 3 new sponsership deal worth around 130 million (wether or not it was paid lump sump or spread across the season to lower profit margin that I haven't looked at) all in all we can spend ready cash ower 200 milion if we realy want we can spend double and more of that sum and we still be within the FFP rules becouse they look at accounts 3 years acumalation

The behemoth generating structure of La Liga's distribution of revenue makes it all the more important for the lesser teams to generate their own profits, and perform in the market with the sale of their assets.

WTF are u talking sbout arsene, pls do nt make us pity eith those comments... mou is talking about competing for the EPL and PL, because he is used to win things... arsene, u were «dealing with that situation» but because ur only interest is top 4, some FA cups and making profit for the owners to get ur fat pay check... even so, u are constantly losing with teams with less resourses than us being one of the vest paid coaches... pls start to deal with reality, do nt hurt ud anymore and go away

Since 2003, underdogs receiving less than 20 % of spread bets have gone 86 - 66 during the regular season, resulting in a 56.6 % winning rate and a profit of 15.59 units with a 10.3 % return on investment (ROI).

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

It's hard to believe with less than 2 weeks to go in the transfer market we're on our way to make another profit from transfer dealings!

Bettors may be interested to know that if you focus on road underdogs with an over / under of 44 or less the return on investment jumps to 19.2 %, however, the number of past matches is more than cut in half resulting in a profit of just 49.16 units.

Arsenal are becoming less and less profitable, through Kroenke... probably missing out on Champions league, sponsors are going to be less willing with all the protests and empty stadium, he's said that all he cares about is money, so I don't see why he just doesn't take the profit and go.