About Blog I'm a lifelong Lutheran, and although I'm aware of some of the problems
with Liberation Theology, it has spoken to me for much of my adolescent and adult life.
About Blog I'm a lifelong Lutheran, and although I'm aware of some of the problems
with Liberation Theology, it has spoken to me for much of my adolescent and adult life.
About Blog I'm a lifelong Lutheran, and although I'm aware of some of the problems
with Liberation Theology, it has spoken to me for much of my adolescent and adult life.
Though the curtain of secrecy is drawn over such meetings (one of the abuses that Boff had criticized in his writings), Boff emerged from the encounter smiling, believing that he had made the point that, when dealing
with liberation theology, the church ought to consult people directly involved in the struggle, rather than relying solely on European theologians who, as he told reporters, «look on poverty from the outside, from a position of security, in a paternalistic way.»
Whitehead, as we have just seen, seems unable to support a revolutionary interpretation and is in consequence not so immediately» compatible
with a liberation theology in the strict sense.29 Nevertheless, he has a number of important qualifications to address to the standpoint of a revolutionary theology.
Instead it is reduced to an aid in understanding either the unfolding cosmic drama (as with process thought) or the class struggle of history (as
with liberation theology).
The trouble
with liberation theology is not Jesus» death and resurrection and sending of the Spirit, but his earthly life of solidarity with the oppressed is normative.
Troeltsch also has much in common
with liberation theology.
Jones: Process theology is inept as a theology of liberation, It works at cross-purposes
with liberation theology about 40 percent of the time.
This brings me to my enduring difficulty
with liberation theology and its attempt to ground its vision of social and economic reform in the Bible.
Is there common ground evangelicals might share
with liberation theology?
As
with liberation theology, feminisms elsewhere are a point of reference for an indigenous development, the nature of which has yet to be adequately described.
A third reason for selecting political theology rather than liberation theology for discussion in this book is that other process theologians have begun the dialogue
with liberation theology, and I am confident that this will continue.
If process theology moves in this direction, then the result would be an appropriate complementarity
with liberation theology.
Process theology, in spite of its claims to the contrary, is not very compatible
with liberation theology and in fact often works at cross purposes to it.
On a scale of 1 to 10, Jones predicts that process theology will tally 6 points of compatibility
with liberation theology's gospel and mission of economic, social, and political liberation for the wretched of the earth.
Jones uses these guidelines as a «grid» in order to evaluate process theology's compatibility claims
with liberation theology.
This global perspective contrasts not only with political theologies of the past which correlated theology with the needs of particular states, but also
with liberation theologies.
Not exact matches
The university is striving to overcome the intellectual insularity of the Soviet era, but few of the
theology students I met had wrestled
with the difficult challenges that have shaped contemporary Western
theology, such as historical criticism or
theologies of
liberation.
While having enough respect for Michael Novak to read him
with openness and humility, I was left disturbed by some of his insinuations in the article, «
Liberation Theology» What's Left» (June - July).
Liberation theology is not the occasion for the ideological promotion of a vantage point, and the fact that it can be done from all vantage points, ecumenically and universally,
with each correcting and corrected by the other, should effectively discourage such.
What we end up
with, if we hold fast to Walker's Hartshornean, black
liberation theology is an «in the by - and - by»
theology.
Liberation theology «is obliged» to provide African American theologians
with the guidelines for theological construction.
In the latter decades of the twentieth century, the phrase
liberation theology often has been used synonymously
with Latin American
liberation theology.
The second element has to do
with the implications of
liberation theology's concrete focus on Jesus Christ.
Under the influence of the recent varieties of
liberation theologies we are learning to appreciate this way of theologizing, and some of the more creative work in the interpretation of Wesley and the Wesleyan tradition has drawn on correlations of theological method
with the
liberation theologians.
«We need to move toward a dialogical
theology in which the praxis of dialogue together
with that of human
liberation will constitute a true locus theologicus, i.e., both a source and basis for theological work.»
I can not identify
with any one form of
liberation theology, and insofar as they are separated from the technical, historical and methodological questions dealt
with by the «establishment,» these
theologies suffer incompleteness.
The distinction between the emphases that have been characteristic of
liberation theology and process
theology respectively can be indicated
with the words «interests» and «perspectives.»
It would complicate this paper too much to deal
with all the
theologies of
liberation; so in this paper I shall limit the reference to Latin American
liberation theology.
The pastor espoused a black
liberation theology that equates Jesus» life and death
with the plight of those who Wright saw as disenfranchised, from African - Americans to Palestinians.
There is little doubt that the concern for cultures and religions expresses the middle class social location of most process theologians, whereas the focus on political and economic issues and the concomitant demand for justice express the identification
with the poor that is the glory of
liberation theology.
Although Brown does not uncritically agree
with everything said by theologians of
liberation, he presents his form of process
theology more as a supplementation and conceptual grounding of their insights than as expressing a different understanding of the theological task.
This is at odds
with the teaching of
liberation theology, where you had black theologians like Dr. James Cone who wrote that the gospel is essentially for the oppressed and not the oppressor.
They all claimed they had the right to question / disagree
with his black
liberation theology.
How do you feel
Liberation Theology competes
with or compliments different understandings of the gospel?
I think that all
theology outside of the religious right has a PR problem in the U.S. Glenn Beck's comments about
liberation theology — in conjunction
with the clips from Jeremiah Wright's sermons — brought
liberation theology to the attention of mainstream media.
According to Sigmund,
liberation theology needs to move into a third phase, one of «dialogue
with liberalism.»
But the fundamentalists are popular
with the Pinochet government because of their political conservatism and emphasis on passive acceptance of authority — in contrast to socially activist Catholic groups inspired by
liberation theology.
Our visitor nodded, took notes, and finally probed
with clinical precision: But would you say
liberation theology is dead?
He contends, first, that
liberation theology should free its social analysis from a preoccupation
with global «dependent capitalism» and move toward more specific analyses of land reform and of other pressing needs which would help popular Christian movements be «more politically effective at a national level.»
Other essays in the collection compare and contrast Hartshorne's theism
with Latin American
liberation theology (Peter C. Phan),
with phenomenology and Buddhism (Hiroshi Endo), and
with European philosophy (André Cloots and Jan Van der Veken).
In particular I think the theological style associated
with the various «
liberation theologies» tends to continue the assumption that Christians have a stake in using violence to make history «come out right» — except that now power will be used to aid the oppressed.
We have also held conferences
with Hindus and Neoconfucianists, on African cosmology and various
liberation theologies,
with political theorists and economists,
with psychiatrists and educators,
with biologists and physicists.
He would like to see
liberation theology take its cues from base communities» populist «grass - roots communitarian democracy» and then extend this «populism» into a liberalism that, contra Marx, offers «democracy and equality to all human beings, regardless of sex, race or social class (Rousseau)» Sigmund's agenda would purge
liberation theology of much of its «early revolutionary fervor,» but in its dialogue
with liberalism it would still perform «a radical «prophetic» role in reminding complacent elites of the religious obligation of social solidarity, and in combating oppression.»
Yet even if many of the questions posed by
liberation theology are relevant, one can not necessarily respond to them
with identical answers or even necessarily apply the same method in obtaining those answers.
Such efforts represent the sort of sociopolitical praxis that can realistically shed light on theological reflection for those who work
with the heritage of
liberation theology.
Indeed, a «sociological imagination» is slowly transforming all
theologies — sometimes
with unsettling and explicit power, as in the use of critical social theories in political and
liberation theologies; sometimes
with more implicit but no less unsettling effect, as in the increasing use of sociology of knowledge to clarify the actual social settings (or publics) of different
theologies.
Accordingly, in Roots of a Black Future: Family and Church, Roberts draws heavily upon traditional African resources to develop his vision of the black church as an extended family, and in Black
Theology in Dialogue he dialogues with South Korean Minjung theology and with Jewish liberation t
Theology in Dialogue he dialogues
with South Korean Minjung
theology and with Jewish liberation t
theology and
with Jewish
liberation theologytheology.
The status of a strictly metaphysical assertion, taken alone, or only in combination
with other strictly metaphysical assertions, is a matter about which black
theology and most other
theologies of
liberation have shown little interest, and this is so for the best of reasons.