Sentences with phrase «with manmade warming»

It is virtually certain that 2015 will be the warmest year on record, with one of the strongest El Ninos ever recorded combining with manmade warming to send global temperatures soaring.

It is virtually certain that 2015 will be the warmest year on record, with one of the strongest El Niños ever recorded combining with manmade warming to send global temperatures soaring.

Not exact matches

He and Gingrich don't disagree on evolution and manmade global warming probably happening, but the ex-governor does have a firmer grasp on what's required to deal with the economic crisis of our time.

With respect to global warming, it's better to think in terms of manmade climate and environmental change.

Several studies suggest that recent Californian droughts have a manmade component arising from increased temperatures, with the likelihood of such warming - enhanced droughts expected to increase in the future.

Dive with docile whale sharks, the world s largest fish, at Ningaloo Reef between April and June, swim with wild bottlenose dolphins in the warm waters of Monkey Mia and get up close to sea lions, manta rays, dugongs and humpback whales, explore the charming old pearling port of Broome and take a camel ride down Cable Beach at sunset, fly over the beehive shaped domes of the Bungle Bungle Range, boat down the huge, manmade Lake Argyle at Kununurra, explore the wineries and beaches of the Margaret River region, cruise spectacular Geikie and Windjana Gorges in the remote and rugged Kimberley, see the stark outback come alive with glorious wildflowers in winter and early spring and enjoy the sophisticated delights of Perth and the historic port of Fremantle.

We can argue about how to deal with manmade climate change and we can argue about how bad the impacts will be but arguing about whether there is global warming or whether humans are causing it is, quite frankly, absurd.

Also, the idea is to keep warming below +1.5 ºC even with the current energy imbalance (warming in the pipeline) and reductions in aerosols that accompany emissions reductions (though Hansen says the impact of aerosols from fossil fuels was overstated and other manmade aerosols seem to dominate).

10: Given that the authors of the largest ever survey of peer - reviewed opinion in learned papers marked only 64 of 11,944 papers, or 0.5 %, as stating they agreed with the official «consensus» proposition that recent warming was mostly manmade, on what rational, evidence - based, scientific ground is it daily asserted that «97 % of scientists» believe recent global warming is not only manmade but dangerous?

That's how the contradictions happen because they aren't basing their claims on a consistent framework but are just hack and slashing manmade global warming with whatever they can and so don't spot contradictions.

With climate projections showing a trend to higher average and higher extreme temperatures across the West, it's likely that any drought will be more severe than it would have been without manmade warming, the study — along with others — waWith climate projections showing a trend to higher average and higher extreme temperatures across the West, it's likely that any drought will be more severe than it would have been without manmade warming, the study — along with others — wawith others — warns.

Researchers who disagree with the government's apocalyptic manmade global warming theory have been subjected to hundreds of documented death threats.

Manmade warming fanatics repeatedly cite NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, whose director, James Hansen, asserted: «Nine of the ten warmest years in history occurred since 1995, with 1998 the warmest,» an assertion eagerly reported in the media.

I watched the shows with friends who are both «believers» & «sceptics» and surprisingly the «believers» commented that both shows, in different ways, were hardly concealed propaganda pieces in support of the so called consensus on manmade global warming.

Nonetheless, with the passage of time, Pope Francis has seemed to take an ever more decided stance behind the notion of manmade global warming, while sending signals that there was not much room for debate on the issue.

The thermometer network is made up of a patchwork of non-research quality instruments that were never made to monitor long - term temperature changes to tenths or hundredths of a degree... Furthermore, land - based thermometers are placed where people live, and people build stuff, often replacing cooling vegetation with manmade structures that cause an artificial warming (urban heat island, UHI) effect right around the thermometer.

They supported this with poor science and because they blamed the whole fact on manmade global warming, they were able to convince very intelligent scientist that their assumption was correct even with their suspect facts and the assumption became a peer reviewed fact with no facts to support it except poor science and blaming it on man created global warming.

Witness the US Republican politicians, for example, where not one of them believes the science of significant manmade warming coming, and so they focus on the scientists themselves rather than coming up with a policy.

If manmade global warming is true the temperature is going to keep rising, irregardless of past changes and whether you can fit them with various curves.

«With all the hysteria, all the fear, all the phony science, could it be that manmade global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people?

At the end of the day, the discussion about a single calendar year obscures the more important long - term trend of warming air temperatures, warming and acidifying oceans along with melting ice sheets, all of which are hallmarks of manmade global warming.

Literally thousands of scientists disagree with claims that we face an imminent manmade global warming disaster, or that warming is connected to disease or harvests.

But the effects of recent El Ninos have coincided with water that's already warmer because of manmade climate change, Hughes said.

2014 Warming maybe due to near NINO conditions in equatorial Pacific and North West Pacific, No proof that manmade greenhouse gas had anything to do with this wWarming maybe due to near NINO conditions in equatorial Pacific and North West Pacific, No proof that manmade greenhouse gas had anything to do with this warmingwarming.

As for lying, I have observed many scientists seem to have no difficulty with lying when they connect, without a shred of evidence, supportive modeling or any data or often even any theory such things as extreme weather is getting worse or is linked to CO2, wet areas will get wetter and dry areas will get drier, that the ocean swallowed the «missing heat», using a proxy upside down doesn't matter, the models are still adequate for policy even after such a huge divergence from reality, coral die - back is due to manmade warming rather than fishing, all warming must be bad rather than beyond a certain threshold, etc, etc, etc..

With the discussion biased in such a way no wonder so many people go away thinking nothing is known on various subjects and thinking that each new fad overturns manmade global warming.

As the Environmental Protection Agency nears a final ruling that manmade global warming endangers the public health and welfare, «the chamber will tell the EPA in a filing today that a trial - style public hearing» on the science of climate change is needed to «make a fully informed, transparent decision with scientific integrity based on the actual record of the science.»

Furthermore, land - based thermometers are placed where people live, and people build stuff, often replacing cooling vegetation with manmade structures that cause an artificial warming (urban heat island, UHI) effect right around the thermometer.

> There can be little doubt that it would have been much harder to sell the idea of manmade global warming if the Third Assessment Report had been illustrated with, for example, Briffa's reconstruction.

Not only are the posters (or vast majority of them) on this site entirely genuine, they are the people who are expected to make the (immense) sacrifices and dig (deeply) into thier pockets should political governace force through a policy of (attempted) mitigation to the (percieved) threat of manmade global warming such that it is necessary that the scientific community carries these people with them on the journey to the sacrificial altar.

With these outlets included, almost eight percent of print media quotes were from those casting doubt on manmade warming.

In his book Spencer contends that short - term fluctuations in the energy balance and surface temperature are consistent with a low climate sensitivity: «A careful examination of the satellite data suggests that manmade warming due to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide could be less than 1ºC — possibly much less.»

Why does Professor Reif continue to champion the notion of dangerous manmade global warming when it is so greatly at odds with observation?