Sentences with phrase «with meeting spending requirements»

And there are ways you can earn points on your rent and mortgage payments, which is a major expense for most of us that can help with meeting spending requirements.

After you are done with meeting the spending requirements, you will have enough miles in your coffers to get two business class tickets to Europe and Latin America, and almost enough miles for two business - class tickets to Asia.

Not exact matches

You can spend up to a year working with legal and financial advisors to meet requirements, such as obtaining an independent appraisal to value the company's stock.

In order to qualify for the Relationship Rate for Standard Savings, you must have a linked Standard Checking, Performance Checking, Virtual Wallet ® with Performance Spend, Performance Select Checking or Virtual Wallet with Performance Select and meet any one of the following requirements:

In order to qualify for a Relationship Rate for Premiere Money Market, you must have a linked checking account (for the Performance Checking Relationship Rate, you must have a linked Performance Checking or Virtual Wallet ® with Performance Spend; for the Performance Select Checking Relationship Rate, you must have a linked Performance Select Checking or Virtual Wallet with Performance Select) and meet one of the following requirements:

Guerreiro is one left back that would meet the requirements but we would face stiff competition with Liverpool who may be looking to spend this summer for Klopp, there is no doubt that he looks like a player for the future but for the fee that he could command with popular interest, it may force Wenger to look at other opportunities and one may have dropped in his lap.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Taking Success's argument «to its logical conclusion,» Ms. Elia wrote, «would mean that D.O.E. would be required to provide charter schools» prekindergarten programs with public funding without any mechanism to ensure» that they were meeting quality requirements, and that «public funds are being spent in accordance with the requirements.»

Marty Connor, an election lawyer and the former leader of the State Senate Democrats, pulled Teachout's voting records and spent Friday and Saturday sharing them with journalists, noting that she claimed to be a permanently disabled voter (this lets her vote by absentee ballot), had no record of voting in New York in 2011 or 2013 and questioned whether she met the five - year residency requirement to be governor.

Schools therefore have to be more creative with where and how they spend money whilst also ensuring that they meet all mandatory requirements, such as providing training and Continuous Professional Development (CPD) for all staff members.

The teachers» union contract signed last year required teachers to spend 40 minutes each week on activities like meeting with, writing to or calling parents, replacing a requirement that they spend that time tutoring after school.

However, failing to meet the debit spend requirement drops you to APY for the month, making it important to keep up with the 10 - transaction requirement.

These cards often come with a very good sign - up bonus if you meet the minimum spending requirement in the requisite timeframe.

After taking into account the convenience fee, about the only time I can think of that purchasing crypto with a credit card could be a «good deal» is when your crypto purchase is enabling you to meet the initial spending bonus requirement for a new card.

You can get the card, buy the ticket with it, and because tickets are over $ 1,000 you will instantly meet the spending requirement.

So you'll earn 45,000 Wyndham points (worth 3 nights at any Wyndham hotel) after meeting minimum spending requirements with the premium version of the Barclaycard Wyndham Rewards card.

Several cash - back cards offer rewards of $ 150 to $ 200 once you spend a certain amount within the first few months, and you would meet that requirement easily with your ticket purchases.

With the no - annual - fee version of the Barclaycard Wyndham Rewards card you can earn 18,000 Wyndham points (worth 1 nights at any Wyndham hotel) after meeting minimum spending requirements.

While you can also meet your minimum spending requirements by using your credit card to donate outright to a charity, you would be parting with your money forever.

This is a great way to help meet the minimum spending requirement on ANY credit card, or even for earning miles and points for transactions which don't usually earn miles and points as long as you buy Vanilla Reload cards with your credit card at Office Depot and load them on your Bluebird card.

With this card, you no longer have to worry about which cards to use for which type of expenditures or how much to spend on each card to meet various requirements.

But, if you don't meet the spending requirements for the bonuses, you're be better off with the Platinum Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Card.

Note: that this is assuming that you pay off your balance to get the full second 1 % cash back with Citi Double Cash, and that you meet the $ 500 spending requirement to get the $ 150 bonus for the Chase Freedom Unlimited.

Never overreach with your finances in order to meet the minimum spending requirement for the bonus rewards.

If you're a traveler who spends enough to meet the minimum spending requirement for the 50,000 bonus points, you'll be better off with the Chase Sapphire Preferred ® Card.

Travel hacking has been easier than I expected as well, we meet all the spending requirements with just our regular spending.

@Linda - I'd eventually get both, but start with the one which you can more easily meet the spending requirement on.

The biggest draw here is the 100,000 points you'll earn for meeting the spending requirement — a significant increase both over the standard offer of 50,000 points and the previous increased sign - up bonuses 80,000 points (with a lower minimum spend).

Once you've got the card, meet its minimum spending requirement — spend $ 3,000 with this card within three months of account opening.

You can earn your way to a free flight within your first 90 days by meeting the spending requirement for the signup bonus, which will award you with a nice chunk of miles.

You can earn 40,000 Hyatt points with the Chase Hyatt after meeting minimum spending requirements.

Be sure to read my post with 40 + powerful ways to meet minimum spending requirements.

For instance, as of December 2014, cards affiliated with American Airlines, Southwest Airlines and British Airways all have offers of 50,000 miles when you get the card and then meet their initial spending requirements.

When you spot a balanced dog who seems to meet all your requirements, ask to spend some time in a room alone with him.

Because Arrival rewards can be applied to travel purchases within the past 90 days, Erica can go back in time to apply her bonus credit, allowing her to lock in her trip as soon as she receives her Arrival card rather than waiting to meet the minimum spend requirement and for miles to be deposited in her account as would be necessary with other programs.

Whether it's worth it for you depends on how highly you value the points or miles you're manufacturing, and whether you are using this technique to meet minimum spending requirements you can't meet with your everyday purchases.

In order to earn the sign - up bonus, you usually have to meet a spending requirement of some sort — spending a certain amount in a specified amount of time, making a certain number of purchases or making at least one purchase with the card.

With a 40,000 points signup bonus after earning at least a point per dollar meeting the $ 3,000 minimum spend requirement on Chase Sapphire Preferred, it appeared that earning the 44,000 points needed for two (more) nights in the best Hyatt properties was doable.

Because you'll earn at least 1 mile per dollar in meeting the minimum spend requirement and because you earn 10 % of your miles back on redemptions, you'd actually end up with enough miles for a free one - way flight in the US and Canada after redeeming for a roundtrip to Europe.

Because the sign - up bonus nets cardholders 40,000 points ($ 400) and because cardholders earn 2x points on all purchases, they'll start with a minimum of 42,000 points after meeting the minimum spend requirement.

For instance, as of December 2014, cards affiliated with American Airlines, Southwest Airlines and British Airways all have offers of 50,000 miles when you get the card and then meet their initial spending requirements.

Hitting credit card spending requirements with tuition payments There is one case in which it might be worth it to pay a large bill, such as a tuition payment, with a rewards - earning credit card, even if there is a fee: when you are trying to meet a minimum spending requirement to trigger a big sign - up bonus.

Points transfer at a 1:1 ratio, so if you were to eventually move all of your Ultimate Rewards points, you'd have a minimum of 43,000 Avios to work with given the lowest number of points you'd earn meeting the minimum spend requirement.

The card comes with a hefty sign - up bonus if you meet the minimum spending requirement within the stated timeframe, which can get you off to a fast start.

Many cards offering travel rewards will also come with signup bonuses, which can be worth tens of thousands of points if you can meet the spending requirement.

So it makes no sense to register for 3 cards all at once with a minimum spend requirement of $ 10,000 within 3 - 4 months, if I know I can not meet that spending obligation.

If on the other hand, meeting minimum spend requirements is not ever an issue for you, then I say go with this offer.

The Chase Sapphire Preferred obviously comes with the larger sign - up bonus, but it does require a larger minimum spending requirement to meet.

Even though the minimum spending requirement is a little bit higher with the Chase Sapphire Preferred, you earn 10,000 ($ 100) more points after meeting the minimum spending requirement.

Discover has been sending out email with targeted offers similar to Amex Offers that trigger when you meet a certain spending requirement at a specific merchant.