Not
with any moral authority anyway.
If the wartime Vatican had taken a moral stand against Nazism, the outcome might or might not have been different; the Church might have emerged from the war
with the moral authority to stand against the secular tide that has swamped it.
He can speak
with moral authority on the issue: In his state, a gunman killed 20 young children, as well as six adults, at Sandy Hook Elementary School in December 2012.
Not exact matches
The Churches are undermining their own
moral authority with their foolishness.
They would be on much better intellectual and
moral ground if they just allowed for the fact that yes, the religious Jews had Jesus killed so that they could protect their
authority, but that as much to do
with modern Jewish people as the Romans killing the Maccabees has to do
with modern Italians — it's utterly irrelevant.
Kierkegaard shares
with Kant the assumption that being
moral inevitably involves a struggle to thwart the impulses of human nature, which by definition must tug the agent in the direction of aesthetic indulgence — and where does ethics derive the
authority to make me go against my feelings?
How does he feel entitled to make any claim to be a better Catholic than Santorum (for that is what he's implicitly claiming) on questions that the church rightly leaves to the prudential judgment of voters and public officials, within broad boundaries, when in the next breath he confesses his complete failure to be any kind of Catholic at all on a question on which the church speaks
with categorical
moral authority?
When you believe that your mind is all you need to know right from wrong, you are establishing yourself as the
moral authority, and neglecting the notion that others may disagree
with you.
It is a perfectly consistent position to hold that lawmakers have a
moral obligation to legislate in accordance
with the natural law and to hold that judges possess only the limited
authority to interpret those laws according to the lawmakers» original meaning.
Once you equate your morality to the morality of a «God», it's just personal opinions framed as «objective» and your opinion of what is God's «
morals» carries equal
authority with anyone elses.
To cite but a few examples, there is no mention of distinctively Catholic
moral teaching, or of bishops and communion
with Peter, or of the teaching
authority of the Magisterium.
It's just your opinion and your opinion of what is
moral carries equal
authority with that of Hitler and serial killers.
When the Church speaks
with clear magisterial
authority on questions undoubtedly within the compass of «faith and
morals»» sexual ethics and the meaning of marriage and procreation» the Catholic house divides one way.
In February 1960, Nikita Khrushchev authorised a covert plan to discredit, because of its fervent anticommunism, the Vatican's
moral authority in Western Europe
with a campaign of disinformation, Pope Pius XII being the prime target.
The Church speaks
with Christ's own
authority on faith and
morals and evils such as abortion, casual sex, the culture (or «anti-culture») of recreational drugs, binge - drinking, and pornography.
It was the economic and productive unit of society, tilling the land together; it was the political unit of society,
with parental
authority as the supporting microcosm of the state; it was the cultural unit, transmitting letters and arts, rearing and teaching the young; and it was the
moral unit, inculcating through cooperative work and discipline those social dispositions which are the psychological basis and cement of civilized society».
what upsets people is what i DO N'T do: such as lead in a particular way, teach
with authority, be more charismatic, not setting a higher
moral standard, stuff like that... it's not about what i or we DO as a community.
Neo-fundamentalists believe they alone are remaining true to the fullness of the gospel and orthodox faith while the rest of the evangelical church is in grave, near - apocalyptic danger of theological drift,
moral laxity, and compromise
with a postmodern culture — a culture which they see as being characterized by a skepticism towards Enlightenment conceptions of «absolute truth,» a pluralistic blending of diverse beliefs, values, and cultures, and a suspicion of hierarchies and traditional sources of
authority.
When a patient's problems are related to religious or
moral conflict, the staff clergyman would be the most likely person for the patient to see because of his
authority in this area and because he may be perceived by the patient to be the most appropriate person to deal
with these problems.
Bibliolatry became a problem when, confusing traditionalism
with Tradition, the Protestant Reformers claimed the Bible as the ONLY binding
authority for faith and
morals:
Since his first arrest, Byle has been plagued by problems
with Turkish
authorities, including a five - year court battle for residency that ended, seemingly, in January 2015, when a court ruled that the government had not shown significant evidence that he was «a threat to national security and public
morals» or that he had ever even committed a crime.
Once God has ceased to exist in human experience as the omnipotent and numinous Lord, there perishes
with him every
moral imperative addressed to man from a beyond, and humanity ceases to be imprisoned by an obedience to an external will or
authority.
If the Imam does not comply
with the Sunnah it is the
moral and religious obligation of a Muslim to rebel against his
authority.
But such an objection would only prove that Christians have frequently been wrongly educated, that they have unintentionally been imbued
with the idea that they are allowed to do anything not explicitly forbidden by the
authorities of the Church and that one has less confidence in the power of the gospel and its grace than in detailed external
moral prescriptions.
We, the president and the members of the commission, wish to affirm that our obligations under civil law must certainly be followed, but even beyond these civil requirements, we all have a
moral and ethical responsibility to report suspected abuse to the civil
authorities who are charged
with protecting our society.
Since without such
authority there is no entity competent to determine just cause, exercise right intention, aim at the establishment of peace, and control armed forces in accord
with the
moral limits of the jus in bello, this lack of sovereignty means that the United Nations as an institution can not have a jus ad bellum in the fundamental just war sense.
Christian Reconstructionism offers a formula for reinstituting
moral authority and control in a society supposedly faced
with chaos and lawlessness.
The ecclesial reality of the Church is intricately interwoven
with its life as a
moral community — it has to constantly test its
authority to be the
moral voice in the world against its ability to respond
with courage and conviction to the voices of the excluded, the voices from the margins.
The Decade has pointed this out repeatedly to the churches - first that the veneer of silence
with which violence against women is dealt
with is a
moral failure of the Church and secondly that outrageous biblical and theological legitimizations of violence, calling into question the
authority and power of the church, as a
moral community.
It begins where women in theology attempt to deconstruct basic ethical principles such as «the common good» and «the question of
moral power and
authority,» but from there it moves to the creative impulses we see around us, as women in faith and faithfulness reconstruct the future image and face of the Church as a «community of Christ, bought
with a price, where everyone is welcome, «14 as Letty Russell describes it.
In our generation there is danger and hope — danger that these noncognitive accouterments will lose their aesthetic harmony and hypnotic power when integrated
with the basic prehensions of science, and be reverted into impotent and empty symbols, jarring, ugly, and without force in final satisfactions: hope that the power of Jesus as lure will reassert itself in an aesthetic context devoid of supernaturalism, a context such that (the language now picks up echoes of van Buren) the vision of Jesus, the free man, free from
authority, free from fear, «free to give himself to others, whoever they were «1 — such that this vision in its earthly, human purity will lure our aims to a harmonious concrescence, integrating scientific insight and
moral vision and producing a modern, intensely fulfilling human satisfaction.
In short,
authority is a way of investing power
with moral and religious accountability.
But
with the same claims to residual
authority, some states in the past had objected on
moral grounds to interracial marriages.
In contrast, «cultural relativism,» which Professor Arkes equates
with legal positivism, holds that there are «no
moral truths which hold their validity across cultures... [So that statutes or constitutional provisions] have the standing of law only because they are «posited» or set down by the
authorities in any country.»
As a working hypothesis, «infallibility» is kept in order to affirm
with the Christian tradition that the Bible as «Godbreathed» has full doctrinal and
moral teaching
authority.29»
To support his slurs, Eichenwald first tries to undermine reliance on Scripture as a supreme
authority for
moral discernment and then to show how Christians, oblivious to the problems
with biblical inspiration, ignore its clear teaching.
Your personal attacks on my character not
with - standing, I am still interested in how you can justify defending a church that makes claims of absolute
moral authority while protecting ped - ophiles.
Pursued
with the right kind of arguments and
with sufficient vigor, an escape from the «exemptions ghetto» can bring us out into an open field of religious freedom in full — and of
moral freedom in full for all, thanks to the indispensable leadership role of religious conscience, and the recognition of the duty of men and women to obey God before any
authority of the state.
So, although the law of which Antigone speaks somehow has divine
authority, she has not learned it by reading something like a Bible,
with moral rules delivered by the gods.
«How shall I know in a given case what I ought to do,» he can always turn to the Church which claims to possess the infallible truth of God and which therefore claims to speak
with final
authority on every
moral situation.
Yet it will be an ethic which holds in creative balance the
authority of enduring
moral principles
with the freedom of the Christian spirit.
Speaking at a Mass at St Chad's Cathedral in Birmingham, he said: «It is simply unacceptable to suggest that the resources of the faith communities -LSB-...] can work in cooperation
with public
authorities only if the faith communities accept not simply a legal framework, but also the
moral standards at present being touted by government.»
It shouldn't be surprising that apologists will defend biblical chattel slavery given they are equally willing to defend the slaughter of children and infants; completely disregarding any notion of judgment based on an exercise of free will, completely disregarding any notion of empathy for their suffering, and
with complete rejection of any personal
moral culpability in offering their various incarnations of a Nuremberg defense by placing their self - serving deference to perceived
authority over any and all other
moral considerations.
I for one don't think so, but I do have a problem
with people who push their religion (any kind of religion) on others and act like they are a
moral authority while at the same time commit horrible sins.
It offered to counterbalance the global economic power of the market
with its «universal
moral authority».
He despoiled the reign of Satan through the exorcising of demons, he offered forgiveness to sinners and celebrated the eschatological banquet
with them, and he asserted divine
moral authority in many ways including the striking «but I say unto you» sayings of the Sermon on the Mount.
Young people tend to think out religious and
moral questions for themselves,
with less reliance on churchly
authority.
I get a little tired of an ancient organization
with a history of molesting children and setting people on fire trying to claim
moral authority over a civilization that it threatens
with annihilation.
We go to work, socialize, and share public space
with many people who reject the
moral law's
authority over their lives, people who regard abortion as a fundamental right or who think sexual liberation an imperative.
He recognized that the simple recognition by whites of their race's association
with racism created a vacuum of
moral authority that opened opportunities for black rage.