So it doesn't really matter where L draws the energy from there is more cooling
with more evaporation.
Not exact matches
(Note: you may see
more evaporation of liquids
with the stovetop method.
The planet overheated and water on the surface rapidly evaporated, filling the atmosphere
with water vapor; the vapor trapped
more heat, which caused
more evaporation, and so on.
«It turns out that Titan's north pole is even
more interesting than we thought,
with a complex interplay of liquids in lakes and seas and deposits left from the
evaporation of past lakes and seas.»
That means that for the same amount of liquid,
more heat transfer occurs during the
evaporation of water compared
with the alcohol.
The clearest impact of warming on drought is when higher temperatures cause
more evaporation and increase water demand, as has happened
with this drought.
Alarmists have drawn some support for increased claims of tropical storminess from a casual claim by Sir John Houghton of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that a warmer world would have
more evaporation,
with latent heat providing
more energy for disturbances.
The higher temperatures associated
with climate change near the surface are resulting in increased
evaporation, leading to
more water vapor in the stratosphere which chemically reacting
with the ozone — resulting in ozone depletion.
Recent record snowfall months have coincided
with unusually warm water in the lakes, lack of ice, leading to
more open water for
more evaporation, Feb, 2007 as an example.
As surface water increases
with melting ice will
more evaporation create
more overcast, and stop the warning, and even send us shivering for the igloo.
However,
with me at least, a bit part of the deal is the increased acidity reducing fish harvests, water shortages, droughts severely reducing crops (sure —
more rain, but
more over the ocean, less on land — and
with greater
evaporation before the water trickles to a dry stream bed), increased heat reducing rice production and other heat sensative crops, the heat waves, etc..
There isn't any clear evidence for a missing thermostat in existing models, and if something is going on it's
more consistent
with Clement's temporary thermostat than the old
evaporation / cloud ideas.
In your paper (co-authored
with Wenju Cai) presented to the Pan
Evaporation Workshop at the Academy of Science in Canberra in late 2004, which I attended, you used the SRES A2 scenario projections to reach the conclusion that «By 2100, the equivalent CO2 reaches a level that is
more than three times the level of 1870 (concentration ppm).»
I am interested in learning
more about the potential
evaporation rate (W / m2) in the NCEP / NCAR Reanalysis dataset (Kalnay et al., 1996)- Does anyone have familiarity
with this particular variable and / or know how it was derived?
One thing that does seem clear is that warmer oceans (a la global warming) mean
more evaporation, and that likely leads to storms
with more and
more dangerous rainfall of the kind we saw
with Hurricane Irene last year.
With the Earth known as the «water planet» because of over 70 % of the globe covered by deep oceans, warmer temps directly result in
more evaporation of the ocean water into the air - clouds.
With warming planet, there is increased
evaporation and
more water present in atmosphere.
Although the Middle East is not currently rebounding from an ice age, the scientists say those ancient rebounds have things in common
with the way the climate is changing today: Rainfall is decreasing and higher temperatures are causing
more evaporation that is drying up the land.
He had already been warned on this thread that when I had earlier answered a legitimate question from a commenter far
more polite and sensible than he, I had replied
with a straightforward account of how Professor Lindzen, in a talk that he had given under my chairmanship at the Houses of Parliament, had calculated that if the increase in
evaporation from the Earth's surface
with warming was thrice that which the models predicted then climate sensitivity was one - third of that which the models predicted.
You claim such a justification from the coincidence that the 1 % to 3 % increase in
evaporation seen across the models yields a range of climate sensitivities
more or less in line
with the IPCC range.
While the years
with warm and wet weather extremes have also become
more common in the state, increased temperatures accompanying the precipitation tend to lead to quicker
evaporation, Diffenbaugh said.
(right)
With the transition from dimming to brightening (1980s — 2000s), the enhanced greenhouse effect has no longer been masked, causing
more rapid warming, stronger
evaporation / LH, and an intensification of the water cycle.
The geochemist Wallace Broecker, to whom we owe a number of the important ideas about abrupt climate change, speculates that there is a chain of causation starting
with more far - northern winter sea ice and (because of the ice preventing the winds from stirring up waves and
evaporation and salt excess) thereby fewer sinks for the Gulf Stream, which in turn diminishes the big conveyor loop of currents linking the North Atlantic to the Pacific.
«
With global temperatures warmer now than they were at the beginning of the last century, that means our temperatures are warmer too, which increases the rate of
evaporation and increases the demands on water, increases the stress on the water supply, and also leaves us
more susceptible to breaking the high - temperature record, which we've been doing lately,» Nielsen - Gammon said.
Decreased flows are projected in the summer months in both basins,
with up to a 55 percent decrease in August in the
more southern Kootenay river basin due to higher
evaporation rates.»
With evaporation being the
more powerful effect the rate of energy flow to the air above is likely to increase rather than decrease and the 1 mm deep layer descend and / or intensify despite a warming of the topmost few microns.
«The logic is clear: when temperatures increase there is
more evaporation and the atmosphere has a greater capacity to absorb water vapour,
with the result that its energy content is higher.
The skin layer does get warmer
with more DLR but at the same time the interacting layer above it gets cooler because of the deficit created by increased
evaporation taking place in that interacting layer.
So if they must be kept seperate, as they must, is it not obvious that the DLR takes care of itself, disappears completely in
more evaporation and radiation and providing for the evaporative energy deficit that it causes itself
with no knock on effect on anything?
In the case under discussion additional DLR external to the system being considered has been introduced so as to provoke
more evaporation with the consequences that I described.
Evaporation from the open surface of the container continues throughout and removes
more energy from the liquid than is added from contact
with the air.
Those
with larger surface would be also subject to
more evaporation due higher temperature.
He presents an entirely reasonable analysis, stating little
more than the obvious: that global warming has contributed to warmer ocean temperatures, and that warmer ocean temperatures affect
evaporation and precipitation associated
with hurricanes.
(Every indication of the NOAA
evaporation pan experiment deviations appear to have
more to do
with the change in the surface moisture saturation.)
One of the most well - known effects of global warming is an intensification of the water cycle,
with higher air temperatures leading to increased
evaporation from the seas and soils, and
more atmospheric water vapor contributing to
more frequent heavy precipitation events.
Huntington is the author of a recent review of
more than 100 peer - reviewed studies showing that although many aspects of the global water cycle — including precipitation,
evaporation and sea surface temperatures — have increased or risen, the trend can not be consistently correlated
with increases in the frequency or intensity of storms or floods over the past century.
Mulching your containers will help
with evaporation and you'll have
more time to water before the soil dries out completely.
They claimed a CO2 increase would cause a temperature increase and higher
evaporation with more water vapour in the atmosphere.
R. Gates (09:54:53): Steve, Good work... as the last 10 years were also the warmest, and we know
with more heat we get
more evaporation, and thus, in the winter,
more snow.