Sentences with phrase «with more explanation»

Had Microsoft arranged these options in a better way with more explanation, they at least could have dulled some of the criticism.

Below you will find the most frequent types of insurance with more explanation and the average premiums that Canadians pay:

All of the seven TOROG documents, along with some more explanation about third party opinion practice, can be found on Slaw at slaw.ca / torogmemos.

Below you will find the most frequent types of insurance with more explanation and the average premiums that Canadians pay:

Standard Batman plot with more explanation as to how he became Batman and how he obtained his futuristic weapons.

(HERE is another project that I dry brushed, with more explanation and photos.)

Not exact matches

The data sets aren't huge — 232 participants in October before the election and 152 after, with a total of 772 negotiations recorded — and there may be some other difference that explains the later group's more aggressive behavior, though Low tried to control for factors, like party affiliation, that might offer alternate explanations for the shift.

Make your answer more palatable with a positive explanation.

The more plausible explanation for the stock market's success this year has less to do with Trump, and more to do with the woman he just declined to reappoint as chair of the Federal Reserve, Janet Yellen.

As part of the explanation as to why Europe gives proportionately more ODA, Gunzburg noted that countries with bigger welfare states — like those for which the Scandinavian nations are famed — tend to pay higher taxes, leading to more government revenue that can be spent on aid.

The nation boasts immense human diversity, with limbs and muscles of all sizes, so race or genetic characteristics aren't a valid explanation, said Anirudh Krishna, professor at Duke University, and co-author of a 2008 paper called «Why do some countries win more Olympic medals?»

What matters, in these cases, is that someone on your team is brave enough, vulnerable enough, to use a sentence that starts with, «The story I'm making up right now is...» The idea is to reach the truth as quickly possible, instead of wandering around with your made - up explanation, which more than likely consists of your own shame triggers, and has little relation to reality.

My full report, with many more examples and a deep explanation of how and why channel synergies function, is available here.

In Afghanistan and Iraq, however, the explanation more often lies in the company's relationships with powerful government officials.

It usually requires an explanation on the order of infinite retention («yes, our sales and marketing costs are really high and our annual profit margins per user are thin, but we're going to keep the customer forever»), a massive reduction in costs («we're going to replace all our human labor with robots»), a claim that eventually the company can stop buying users («we acquire users for more than they're worth for now just to get the flywheel spinning»), or something even less plausible.

We went back and forth a bit in the editing, with me trying to shoehorn in more explanation and @TA rightly wanting to simplify to make the article halfway readable to a retail investor (or indeed, just to us!)

The more nuanced explanation for retail's popularity among investors has less to do with Manhattan market fundamentals and more to do with the global flow of capital.

As it is, the book is basically more like a «check list» with explanations than a real «investing book».

I am reasonably certain that biologists have investigated your example curiosities, and more, and likely have explanations consistent with evolution.

I guess that makes more plausible sense than a God with no form, mass or explanation.

No different than my rambling post agreeing with him and providing even more real life human scenarios that can evoke strong emotions, that can easily cause someone to either A: Seek out religion, even if it's only for some semblance of accepttion and / or explanation of the unknown, or B: If they already have a religion, re-embracing it with new enthusiasm.

'' Thomas Jefferson omitted it (Revelation) along with most of the Biblical canon, from the Jefferson Bible, and wrote that at one time, he considered it (Revelation) as «merely the ravings of a maniac, no more worthy nor capable of explanation than the incoherences of our own nightly dreams.»

Unable to deal with that you need some kind of explanation, so you've decided there is an all - powerful, all - knowing sentient being you call God who is responsible for, well, pretty much anything you can't explain with more verifiable causes.

No, a far, far more reasonable explanation is that it is all baloney and that the accounts were interpreted and altered with the intent to show them as evidence for the resurrection.

[30] Thomas Jefferson omitted it along with most of the Biblical canon, from the Jefferson Bible, and wrote that at one time, he «considered it as merely the ravings of a maniac, no more worthy nor capable of explanation than the incoherences of our own nightly dreams.»

It is interesting to note, however, that one of the more common Jewish explanations of this text is that the skin which Adam and Eve were clothed with was snake skin.

As such, this explanation of how a loving, in - control God can be reconciled with suffering is more nearly an affirmation of belief than it is an explanation of anything.

Another simple explanation would be that Jesus gave the same essential teachings more than once, with slightly varying words each time.

But, on the other hand, it is quite unjustified for theists to hold that we must tolerate or swallow the paradoxes or explain them away (by feats of ingenuity so subtle, and verbal methods so remote from intuitive insight or definite logical structures, that only deity could know with any assurance what was taking place), giving as justification the claim that the alternative position of atheism is even more paradoxical (lacking, it may be urged, any principle of cosmic explanation at all).

You follow this sentence (the rest of the paragraph) with the same statement 3 more times, with no explanation as to why you feel this way.

He believes that religionists prefer humanist to social - scientific explanations because they find them more compatible with their personal theological convictions.

Keillor has a keen ear for parody, and makes use of it in unlikely ways, as in the marvelous «Your Wedding and You» with its explanation of the «alternative wedding» (only Garry Trudeau's «Doonesbury» has caught this «60s and «70s language as accurately), and in his more recent homage to punk rock in «Don: The True Story of a Young Person.»

Thomas Jefferson omitted it (Revelation) along with most of the Biblical canon, from the Jefferson Bible, and wrote that at one time, he «considered it as merely the ravings of a maniac, no more worthy nor capable of explanation than the incoherences of our own nightly dreams.»

We're not satisfied with consciousness, we need to attribute that to a connection with higher being and create a convoluted explanation to justify our tenacity to seek validation that indeed we can not just be a mass of molecules... there's got to be more for our insatiable egos!

I have a hunch that one explanation accounts for the silence of evangelical biblical scholars more than any other: the basic fear that their findings, as they deal with the text of Scripture, will conflict with the popular understanding of what inerrancy entails.

[30] Thomas Jefferson omitted it along with most of the Biblical canon, from the Jefferson Bible, and wrote that at one time, he «considered it as merely the ravings of a ma - niac, no more worthy nor capable of explanation than the inc - oherences of our own nightly dreams.»

The author does assume a prior knowledge of Therese, and some instances of her life are mentioned with little explanation, but this is not off - putting; rather it makes the reader want to learn more.

Naturalistic explanations have already been successful enough in explaining natural order to conclude with assurance that the argument from design simply does not carry much weight any more.

A more likely explanation was first put forward by Wellhausen, 15 and it has been widely adopted.16 This states that the story of the discovery of the empty tomb ends with these strange words in order to explain to readers why, as late as the mid-first century, they had never heard of this story before.

Griffin & Sherburne, New York: The Free Press, 1978, 96) His comments are conjectural because he has left metaphysical generality and is»... considering the more special possibilities of explanation consistent with our general cosmological doctrine, but not necessitated by it.»

I'm more than willing to oblige and so is any member of my family with some resonable explanation.

Then I realized that any explanation I came up with from this form of thinking would be nothing more than my own invention.

It could only be denied by offering an alternative and more convincing explanation of the actual phenomena in the New Testament texts to which these scholars are calling attention and with which they are dealing.

Anyone that reads your «explanation» will see that you're more mentally ill than most, have no problem with children being ki11ed because they're «unclean» while their sisters aren't so unclean as to marry them off to the men who ki11ed their families.

The problem of reconciling mental realism with physicalism is felt more keenly by Kim than it is by some of his fellow physicalists because of a third basic assumption, «the principle of explanatory exclusion:» which says: «No event can be given more than one complete and independent explanation» (SM xii, 239).

Below are seven categories (which have been revised from time to time since the original publication of this article), with a little more explanation.

Each «morphology» — even when it results in the form of a static description of structure — is capable of finding a more profound explanation only with the help of the genetic analysis, which alone can show how and why a structure has become that which it is.

With an explanation that leaves the reader possibly more puzzled than Nathanael, Jesus answers, «I saw you under the fig tree before Philip called you.»

[35] Perhaps with this explanation, her comments quoted earlier become more meaningful for this discussion of identity, and her concluding comments on the use of the «master's tool», offer an intelligible link that connects the idea of «politicised identity» with an «imagined identity»:

When he discusses «the hierarchy of societies composing our present epoch,» he says he is «deserting metaphysical generality» and only «considering the more special possibilities of explanation consistent with our general cosmological doctrine, but not necessitated by it» (PR 147).