Sentences with phrase «with noncustodial»

Arizona's statutes encourage judges to order «frequent and continuing contact» with the noncustodial parent when a child lives with her custodial parent the majority of the time.

The findings regarding the relationship between child adjustment and contact with the noncustodial parent are inconsistent and do not lend themselves to a general conclusion.

The research tells us that overnights with the noncustodial parent are NOT detrimental for young children, and that attachment processes and the impact of divorce / parenting plans on disrupted attachment must be thoughtfully considered as we make recommendations for parent - child access.

When parents share physical custody, or when a child spends a substantial amount of time with the noncustodial parent, the burden on the parent who wants to move with the child is heightened.

Children do not have a right to establish specific visitation schedules with the noncustodial parent, but once a child turns 12, the judge may consider the child's suggestions.

In order to enforce this right, the parent with sole physical custody must give the provider a written request not to allow the child to leave with the noncustodial parent, or visit with the child outside the noncustodial parent's visitation hours, and show the provider a copy of the court order.

Click here to see the Office of the Attorney General's My Sticker Calendar, which shows the dates the child spends with the noncustodial parent in gold.

Children spend spring break with the noncustodial parent in even - numbered years and with the custodial parent in odd - numbered years.

The Safe Haven Child Visitation Center is a supervised visitation and monitored exchange center that provides a safe environment for children, in families affected by domestic violence, to visit with their noncustodial parent.

Reunification therapy can be used as an intervention for divorcing or separated families, particularly where children are finding difficulty, for whatever reason, with visiting with the noncustodial parent.

Sole physical custody is awarded only when spending time with the noncustodial parent represents a danger to the child.

This Manual discusses a different type of liability which may result from interference with the noncustodial parent's rights: loss of custody.

The family court's ultimate goal is to determine a custody and visitation plan that is in the best interests of the child, and a court generally finds it in the child's best interests to have visitation with the noncustodial parent.

Each child typically has regular visitation with her noncustodial parent.

Many times custodial mothers struggle with noncustodial fathers who violate custody and visitation court orders.

Parents of very young children should note that Oregon does not recommend overnight visitation with the noncustodial parent for children under age 1.

(a)(1)[«In making an order granting custody to either parent, the court shall consider, among other factors, which parent is more likely to allow the child frequent and continuing contact with the noncustodial parent...»].)

The court considers the child's relationship with the noncustodial parent and how the move affects that relationship, the child's relationship with his community and whether the child enjoys the same educational, spiritual and recreational activities in the new community, whether the custodial parent is likely to encourage a continued relationship with the noncustodial parent, the reasons for the move, plus any benefits the child receives from it.

Today, approximately 41 percent of children are born to unmarried parents and nearly one - third of children live apart from at least one of their biological parents.1 These changes in family structure are cause for concern because unmarried fathers have no automatic legal ties to their children, and children living apart from at least one parent are considerably more likely to live in poverty and spend less time with the noncustodial parent.2

The negative proposition was that children who lose contact with their noncustodial parents after divorce are likely to experience problems.

The judges, attorneys, advocates, court administrators, court services personnel, and law professors interviewed for the study reported that evaluators and guardians ad litem were «heavily influenced by the social and legal policies that facilitate contact with the noncustodial parent without regard to the risks attendant upon contact or relationship.»

Courts determine the custodial parent based on a variety of factors, including who is the primary caretaker, more likely to encourage an ongoing relationship with the noncustodial parent, more strongly bonded with the child, who the child wants to live with and who is the more competent parent.

And joint legal custody, or shared custody, with one parent remaining as the primary physical custodian does little to alter the amount of time a child spends with the noncustodial parent, and does a lot to create control conflicts between parents who continue to harbor resentment stemming from the failure of the marriage.

Generally, a court prefers the child to remain with the noncustodial parent because it is less stressful on the child.

The support obligation will be lowered according to how many overnights the child spends with the noncustodial parent.

For children who had a strong relationship with the noncustodial parent prior to the divorce, sole custody agreements are generally harmful unless there is a compelling safety reason to keep the child away from the other parent, according to Gould.

A move - away case is one of the most difficult cases for the family courts to hear, because the request by the custodial parent to move away with his / her children often has a negative impact on the frequent and continuous contact the children will have with the noncustodial parent.

The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry report «Frequency of Visitation by Divorced Fathers,» claimed that «40 percent of mothers reported that they had interfered with the noncustodial father's visitation on at least one occasion, to punish their ex-spouse.»

The plan should also specify who will provide transportation to and from visits with the noncustodial parent, as well as what the parents will do if the schedule needs to be changed.

As a result, these revisions provide a parenting credit based upon the number of overnights with the noncustodial parent ranging from 52 overnights annually to equal parenting time.

A credit should be awarded for the number of overnights each year that the child (ren) spend with the noncustodial parent.

If workable, it is recommended that no more than two days go by without contact with the noncustodial parent.

Jeremy had spent alternating weekends and one night each week with his noncustodial parent.

On week nights with the noncustodial parent, this usually consisted of dinner and conversation.

If, however, the custodial parent interferes with visitation and takes other actions that appear to be intended to keep the child from having a relationship with the noncustodial parent, the court might alter the custody arrangement.

Child support is calculated using what is referred to as the Arizona Child Support Guidelines and requires a determination of each parent's gross income, the cost of health insurance for the child (ren) only, daycare costs, parenting time days with the noncustodial parent, and extraordinary education costs such as private school tuition.

There is a presumption in favor of relocation for custodial parents with primary custody of children, with the burden being with the noncustodial parent to rebut the relocation presumption, and thus the custodial parent no longer has the responsibility to prove a real advantage to herself or himself and to the children in relocating.

In evaluating the best interests of a child in determining custody in the case of a proposed relocation of one parent, the trial court may appropriately consider several factors including: the advantages of the relocation in terms of its capacity to improve the life of the child; the motives of the custodial parent in seeking the move; the likelihood that the custodial parent will comply with visitation orders when he or she is no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of North Carolina; the integrity of the noncustodial parent in resisting the relocation; and the likelihood that a realistic visitation schedule can be arranged which will preserve and foster the parental relationship with the noncustodial parent.

The factors to be considered include: each parent's reasons for seeking or opposing the move, the quality of the relationships between the child and the custodial and noncustodial parents, the impact of the move on the quantity and quality of the child's future contact with the noncustodial parent, the degree to which the custodial parent's and child's life may be enhanced economically, emotionally and educationally by the move, and the feasibility of preserving the relationship between the noncustodial parent and child through suitable visitation arrangements.

The court may also consider how the child has adjusted to home, school, and community since the parents divorced and which parent is more likely to allow frequent contact with the noncustodial parent.

A sum of money awarded by the Court to the custodial parent to correct any disparity in the financial circumstances of the parties if the court finds that the disparity has resulted or will result in a lower standard of living for the child than the child would have if living with the noncustodial parent.

How parents can use telephones, the Internet, and other technological aids to visit with their noncustodial children when face - to - face meetings are not a viable option.

Kids sometimes propose spending an entire summer, semester, or school year with the noncustodial parent.

Not exact matches

It might be tempting to tell young children little white lies about where they came from or where an absent parent is — especially if a noncustodial parent has abandoned the family or has struggled with drugs or mental illness.

It gives the noncustodial parent more time with the baby, while also giving the custodial parent time to catch on some (probably much - needed) sleep.

One commentator has suggested that, psychologically, the children deprived of contact with one parent may suffer feelings of loss akin to mourning as well as uncertain or conflicting attitudes about men, who most often are the noncustodial parent.

This can leave the noncustodial parent with little time to spend with the child and few rights regarding important parenting decisions.

When parents divorce or break up, the noncustodial parent (the one with less parenting time) usually pays child support to the custodial parent (the parent with more custodial time) based on the parents» respective incomes.

When parents divorce or break up, the noncustodial parent (the one with less parenting time) usually pays child support to the custodial parent (the parent with

If the custodial parent interferes with the ability of the noncustodial parent to see his or her child during scheduled visitation hours, then the noncustodial parent can file a petition for enforcement of a visitation order.