Sentences with phrase «with none of the concerns»

With the Mom Care Baby Wrap, you and your newborn or younger baby will be able to enjoy all the great benefits of babywearing with none of the concerns.

This allows for rapid, large - scale CBDV creation with none of the concerns around growing marijuana.

Not exact matches

None of the principals appeared much concerned with the cognitive dissonance between Marston's champion - of - truth faà § ade and his secret harem of smart, accomplished women.

By itself, none of this would be overly concerning, but in conjunction with foaming - at - the - mouth bullish sentiment, stretched valuations and a sharp slowdown in money supply growth, it is hard to be anything but concerned.

And, from a practical viewpoint, with the economy in the tank, unemployment out of limits, and us fighting a war that never had a possible solution, anything a couple of people can do to make themselves happy is none of anyone's business and, as far as I am concerned, OK.

«That this House expresses profound concern that, despite voting 279 in favour and none against the motion calling on the Government to refer genocidal atrocities of Daesh to the United Nations Security Council on 14 April 2016, still, no such referral has been made; recalls the words of the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs in an article in the Telegraph on 27 March 2016, Daesh are engaged in what can only be called genocide of the poor Yazidis, though for some baffling reason the Foreign Office still hesitates to use the term genocide; and calls on the Government to ensure that the unanimous will of Parliament is implemented with urgency.»

A major difficulty in interpreting Process and Reality is that of reconciling his theory of extension in Part IV with his system of categories in Part I. None of those categories concerns the concept of region.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

None of these approaches to the public expression of Protestant faith have dealt effectively with what I take to be the most important question facing those concerned with world order.

Free will doesn't answer the question since if your god was concerned with that, then why the radical chance of its modus operandi from the supposed personal appearances of these gods to none at all?

It may be a heavy - handed allegory, but Neill Blomkamp's sci - fi blockbuster is part of a wave of recent films concerned with humanity's future — none of... More

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

Religious freedom becomes then merely the right to worship any God you please or none at all, with the implication that religion is a purely private matter of no interest or concern to political society.

Although we know that Jesus was less concerned with minute details of the Law than with man's basic relation to God, he is here saying: If you truly understand what God asks in the Law, you will see that none of it (not an iota or dot) is lost in my teaching.

Early codes limiting the rights of masters concern themselves with Hebrew slaves only, implying that at first only fellow Hebrews in bondage were conceived as having rights, while foreign slaves were still regarded as having none.

None of those teams are overly concerned with those results however.

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Biggest Concern is with Arsenal that they can not spend on transfers the way City, Chelsea and United can... And if Ozil and Sanchez leaves this summer then we would Require 3 players in squad including 1 striker but certainly we don't that much Financial strength to spend 150 Millions for buying 3 players... We would only able to replace either Ozil or Sanchez or none of them if buy any striker...

As far as I am concerned Wenger has come out and said the board have backed him with the cash if he requires it, whether Arsene has gone out of his way to lie and cover for the powers that be to save his job is none of my business.

Less concerned at this stage with rumors about who we might bring in as the seeming lack of movement on the exit front... We need to offload at least 4 players beyond arteta an roszicky from Walcott Ramsey Campbell ox mert Gibbs flamini... None is a guaranteed starter at arsenal but no one seems interested in taking the bite other than for ox

etc) If your child has none of these at 18 months, then it's time to be concerned with speech / language.

But Home Office minister Vernon Coaker said that during meetings with policemen, victims of crime and drug addicts over the past few months, «none of them have raised the classification system as a concern that affects them with me».

Amusingly, the only reason any of my friends use such terms (being the largely libertarian group that we are) is to have a dig at you pain in the arse lefties who can't help but concern themselves with things that are none of their business.

None of our results can be replicated, we're all drawing unsurprising conclusions, and none of us would allow moral concerns to interfere with resuNone of our results can be replicated, we're all drawing unsurprising conclusions, and none of us would allow moral concerns to interfere with resunone of us would allow moral concerns to interfere with results.

The researchers themselves have always wanted to publish without restriction, and of the 22 people who met in Geneva, fully half were leading flu researchers, and none of the rest were biosecurity experts concerned with bioterrorism.

One dimension is the degree of saturation, which concerns how many double bonds they possess, with saturated fats possessing none, monounsaturated fats having only one, and polyunsaturated fats having two or more.

Fasting is in the Bible and there's a variety of reasons why they fasted in the bible, none of which had to do with physical health, but spiritual concerns.

For those of you who aren't as concerned with price (don't worry, none of these are like $ 1,000 jeans because lets be real here) I'm rounding them up by style for you below.

Director James Ponsoldt gives us all of the teen awkwardness and curiosity with none (or at least very little) of the melodrama, and Miles Teller and Shailene Woodley are spectacular leads; though the film is primarily about Sutter, Woodley steals the show with her quiet love and concern that manifest themselves so plainly in her every expression.

None of the technical concerns with value - added testing involve perverse incentives.

None of the panelists directly responded to Wolk's concerns about the wisdom of maintaining an adversarial relationship with downloaders, as in his view, strict enforcement has proven utterly ineffective for slowing unauthorized distribution, A punishment - based approach can also be problematic because it overlooks the possible positive effects of widespread unauthorized distribution, particularly around brand - building, awareness, and the sale of licensed properties.

But I had many UK publishers, not one: Faber, Hodder, Scholastic, S&S, Penguin, A & C Black, Larousse, Corgi, OUP, CUP... Some editors were better than others, but none of them were simply concerned with how much they could market the book for — which is what asking the writer only to change the word count amounts to.

While none put their concerns on record for this feature, Portland - area rescuers have openly complained about the difficulty of finding available shelter space for local animals when shelters and foster homes fill with out - of - state transports.

«[It's] is a purely experimental, creative label with none of the typical concerns like schedules, profitability, or even target audience.

Many have raised concerns about the ways that you interact with the world, but none have criticised the fidelity of what they could see.

If it makes those of you with questions and concerns feel better: none of this is surprising to hear, and it's built on the lessons of what we've been learning for years now.

On the other hand, Rothko showed none of Doerner's concern for the careful construction of stretchers, and he adopted the late medieval technique of interposing an isolating egg - white glaze between layers of pigments or vanish, which Doerner had specifically discouraged since egg white becomes very brittle with time and turns brown.

Despite first appearances, and shared formal concerns, maybe none of these paintings have much in common after all: Gallagher's is one part emo to Barrett's Monty Python, and Summer Wheat's grotesque girl has nothing to do with Kinder's psychedelic psychology.

With his quest against the word «forecast», a word whose definition is none of his concerns, Don Don is casting himself as a climate Don Quixote.

None of the funds made available to the Environmental Protection Agency by this division or any other Act may be expended for purposes of enforcing or promulgating any regulation (other than with respect to section 202 of the Clean Air Act) or order, taking action relating to, or denying approval of state implementation plans or permits because of the emissions of greenhouse gases due to concerns regarding possible climate change.

If none can be found, we can state with certainty that GISS is an untrustworthy source of information concerning temperature trends and the manipulation of data is purposeful and dishonest.

None of this, though, takes anything away from ongoing warming driven by ongoing increases in forcing as Hypothesis 3 is only concerned with shifts away from the longer term forced trend.

Piles of the stuff are virtually everywhere, a fact that these recyclers - by - trade seem none too concerned with.

None of the Acts seems to deal with a need for a witness or (with a limited exception in section 24 of the Ontario Land Registration Reform Act) a need for a document to be sworn or declared, both of which can be common concerns in real estate dealings.

OTLA is hardly out of step with this position: The very same concerns were raised in 2007 by none other than Ontario's former associate chief justice Coulter Osborne, who wrote in his report on the Civil Justice Reform Project:

In R v Spencer, which dealt with informational privacy relating to Internet service subscriber data in the hands of third - party companies, Cromwell J, for the court, organized the expectation of privacy analysis into four general areas: (1) the subject matter of the alleged search; (2) the claimant's interest in the subject matter; (3) the claimant's subjective expectation of privacy; and (4) whether this subjective expectation of privacy was objectively reasonable, having regard to the totality of the circumstances.6 None of these tests are inconsistent; they are articulations of the same overarching concerns grouped differently as suited to a particular inquiry.

Only, none of us have extra funds just lying around to pay for her burial expenses when the time comes, and while her passing is most likely some time away, with the rising costs of funeral expenses, I'm concerned what that burden may be.

None of this should concern you though, as the build and feel in the hand are phenomenal, with Blackberry adding their own textures and small hardware design touches to the core phone.

As mentioned, there are only a couple of changes with the Xperia XZs when compared to its predecessor, but none as far as the design or build quality are concerned.