Not exact matches
I emphasize «analogously» because of the
nonsensical implications
resulting from a strictly literalistic transference to God of our mundane experience of causation when referring to the sense that our universe is ultimately cared for and impregnated
with purpose.
A completely
nonsensical rebuild, the
result of a jackass owner
with no vision and a steady diet of fermented quarterly earnings reports.
I wish I could even call this dud half - baked, because I don't even think it was ever in the same room as an oven,
with such ill - conceived characters and a bizarre,
nonsensical storyline, it's like the
result of pouring everything you have in the fridge into a blender and pressing puree.
With its story of a love triangle gone sour, the unintentionally comic result was a masterpiece of inept moviemaking — inane, non-sequitur-filled dialogue, hilariously melodramatic acting, gratuitous sex, and a nonsensical narrative rife with inconsistencies, red herrings, and plot ho
With its story of a love triangle gone sour, the unintentionally comic
result was a masterpiece of inept moviemaking — inane, non-sequitur-filled dialogue, hilariously melodramatic acting, gratuitous sex, and a
nonsensical narrative rife
with inconsistencies, red herrings, and plot ho
with inconsistencies, red herrings, and plot holes.
The game demands a lot of the PS4's already aging hardware
with the
nonsensical amount of colorful neon signs, Tokyo-esque amount of pedestrians and real - time rendered buildings, which
results in a much slower experience than before.
let's take this to an extreme... suppose that internal variability is zero... then the «within group» s.d. is zero... suppose that models agree pretty well
with each other and observations fall within the tight band of model projections... then by steve's method you create the average of models and call it a model...
with an s.d. of zero... show that the model falls outside the observational s.d.... proclaim that the model fails... claim that this is a test of modelling... hence extrapolate that all models fail... even though observations fall slap bang in the model range... this
result is
nonsensical... per tco it isn't how models are used... where's structural uncertainty?
Sometimes, Burns says, in an attempt to outline quantifiable
results, numbers and percentages, candidates succeed only in confusing potential readers
with buzzwords and
nonsensical phrases, he says.