Sentences with phrase «with objects known»

The beauty of the Standard Model is in its symmetry; mathematicians describe its symmetries with objects known as Lie groups.

Not exact matches

Should your broker (IB) opt to stop doing business with an FCM, your account will follow the broker to its new clearing arrangement in a transaction known as a «bulk transfer»; unless, of course, you specifically object.

As Trapani explains: «The intellect [for Maritain] is a superior, intuitive, immaterial knowing power that operates together with the instrumentality of the senses in a diversity of ways, and, having being as its proper object, it puts us in direct contact with reality itself.»

Yet having encountered this fantastic tree with human features, readers can no longer look upon real trees as mere objects meant only for our manipulation.

The laws of physic requires that there be forces and objects that interact with each other, such as the four forces now known, of gravity, electro - magnetism, the strong and weak nuclear forces (and now there is possibly dark energy) that is interwoven within matter.

In spite of his early and short - lived embrace of nationalist sentiment and language and the military games he played with household objects, he knew that history was elsewhere, away from Jerusalem and what it represented.

But this past week I was talking to someone about grace, and they objected with the grace litmus test, and I don't know what happened, but I sighed out of exasperation and decided to give a different answer than the one I had always given before.

There emerges reflection or self - consciousness.23 Reflection is «the power acquired by consciousness to turn in upon itself, to take possession of itself as of an object endowed with its own particular consistence and value: no longer merely to know, but to know oneself; no longer merely to know, but to know that one knows.»

In manus tuas commendo spiritum meum.17 Into the hands which broke and quickened the bread, which blessed and caressed little children, which were pierced with the nails; into the hands which are like our hands, the hands of which one can never tell what they will do with the object they are holding, whether they will break it or heal it, but which we know will always obey and reveal impulses filled with kindness and will always clasp us ever more closely, ever more jealously; into the gentle and mighty hands which can reach down into the very depth of the soul, the hands which fashion, which create, the hands through which flows out so great a love: into these hands it is comforting to surrender oneself especially if one is suffering or afraid.

It will naturally be objected that the real expert can not share his specialized knowledge with the untrained, and that is no doubt true.

The Faith movement's push for such coherence involves affirming, in a neo-Augustinian manner, the dynamic relationship of spiritual mind (whether of the absolute God or of the human soul in his image) with the objects of its knowing, as a metaphysical first principle.

With this relationship you could no longer infer what the properties of an object are from the observed spot P, and from a knowledge of how the apparatus was arranged, and so on.

His solution was the disengaged form, but with that the form of the object becomes abstract — not in the sense that it is grasped as an abstract essence but insofar as it no longer remains the form of that individual — and this is the problem that Whitehead saw and tried to solve.

Hence, new qualities that emerge are not merely empirical qualities of new «occasions,» they are also «eternal objects,» belonging to a world of what Plato called forms or ideas; they are both immanent and transcendent: «Here Alexander inclines towards an empiricist tradition... which identifies that which is known with the fleeting sense - datum of the moment; Whitehead, with his mathematical training, represents a rationalist tradition which identifies that which is known with necessary and eternal truths.

Buber agrees with Kant that we can not know any object in itself apart from its relation to a knowing subject.

The «word» may be identified with subject - object, or I - It, knowledge while it remains indirect and symbolic, but it is itself the channel and expression of I - Thou knowing when it is taken up into real dialogue.

First, yes... I know... I'm being hyper - literal here, but I wouldn't argue with an inanimate object such as a book.

The reason children require a number of years to develop mastery of certain basic concepts, according to some child psychologists, is not that they are slow in learning the words — they actually know the words quite early — but that they have to start experiencing the world in a new, more simplified way that corresponds with the classifications suggested by these words.4 For example, young children may know the words spoon, teaspoon, silver, knife, and metal but find it difficult for several years to apply them appropriately to objects in their environment, the reason being partly that these words form multiple and overlapping classifications.

We embody the truth when we live the right kind of life, but we should not claim to know it with certainty because it is still work in progress — an object of aspiration — and we will not know till the end.

Now the knowing subject can not be indifferent to the abyss with which it has to do, especially also when this Whither is not its explicit object; hence it has the freedom to be inevitably concerned with God himself even if this happens always within the sphere of the concrete individual.

-- be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object; «She doesn't know this composer»; «Do you know my sister?»

In the special theory of relativity, one shows that the mass of an object is no longer constant, but varies with velocity according to the relationship

Consequently as regards the fundamental contention we are examining, it is not appropriate, in view of the historical associations that burden the word «material» to subsume under the term «matter» the subjectivity which is also met with within the primordial unity we have described, because to do so would at least obscure the equally fundamental difference encountered in that unity between the knowing subject and the object which is merely met with.

Confronting the same constellation of objects as before and knowing that he does so, he nevertheless finds them transformed through and through in many of their details... Operations and measurements are paradigm - determined... Scientists with different paradigms engage in different concrete laboratory manipulations.

Before I knew it, it was being littered with every conceivable object — skateboards, wristwatches, wallets, walkmans, shoes, checkbooks, sunglasses, palm pilots, cell phones, candy, necklaces, and various other things.

Actually not every thing is equally related to the concept of knowledge and to know - ability, even though ii is also true that precisely as something and as an object of knowledge it must somehow enjoy equal status with everything else with respect to conceptual comprehension.5 The differing internal relations of the objects of knowledge to the concept of knowledge establishes the relevance of these as philosophical objects.

So throughout history: we treat each other with suspicion; we are no longer persons for each other but objects to each other.

When, through the «breaking - through,» i.e., through a «cutting off» of the ego from the world, and through an identification of the ego with the motivating dynamis of the unconscious, this severance is once more resolved, God disappears as object and becomes the subject which is no longer distinguished from the ego, i.e., the ego as a relatively late product of differentiation, becomes once more united with the mystic, dynamic, universal participation (participation mystique of the primitives).1

There does seem to be something fundamentally wrong with activity exclusively determined by the pursuit of power, or claims to «know» which simply reflect the imposition of the perspective of the knower upon the object known.

In 2012 the lines between the sacred and the profane will get even more blurry: Scientists will religiously maintain their search for the elusive God particle (they won't find it); evangelical sports superhero and Denver Bronco quarterback Tim Tebow will continue to be both an inspiration to the faithful and an object of scorn to skeptics (he will be watching, not playing in, the Super Bowl); at least one well - known religious leader or leading religious politician will be brought down by a sex scandal (let's hope all our leaders have learned a lesson from former Rep. Anthony Weiner and stay away from sexting); and the «nones» - those who don't identify with one religion - will grow even more numerous and find religious meanings in unexpected places (what TV show will become this season's «Lost»?)

Nature knows of consciousness; but only man is self - conscious, with the capacity to make himself into his own object.

«We are concerned only with Nature, that is, with the object of perceptual knowledge, and not with the synthesis of the knower and the known» (PNK vii).

We can only praise him for having chosen the religion he knows best as the object of his critique, and can only admire the loyalty with which he agrees unreservedly to submit Christianity to criticism.

By rendering feeling as the interactive function of dative and concrescent actual entities, he can maintain that the subject - object distinction does not merely supervene at any special cognitive level and hence need not be identified either with the difference or the identity of knower and known.

«Objects from these islands are often difficult to date and authenticate, but with these we know where they've been since they were brought back by Williams.

Even inferior teams seam to know how to cope with our attacking formula and our defence is an open book.Money will not be a no object so we're stuck with the irish jig wearing cowboy unless Arsenal start losing money.I'm afraid the future is not looking bright with him, this board and the French lacky hold the reins.

We all know that money is no object to Chelsea, especially when Roman Abramovich continues to financially support the club with his small change.

You can make the game fun by starting with objects that you know the child already knows, such as cars, and then sneak in new objects and words.

25 to 36 months Your child doesn't know what to do with everyday objects, doesn't understand simple instructions, doesn't use two - word phrases by 30 months, doesn't ask questions, can't pronounce vowels or be understood half the time by someone who doesn't know him by the time he's 3, or loses skills he once had.

A small, cozy «buddy», often known as a transitional object, is a great way to provide your baby with extra security around the time that they are ready to transition from being swaddled to sleeping with arms free.

So, it's really keeping them out of those areas and setting up the areas for your older children that they can play in, with those toys like the Lego's or you know the dolls or the clips and stuff that have little objects and then they have other areas where the older child can play with the younger child for age appropriate toys, so that they can play together by keeping the non - age appropriate toys either in a separate room or in that older child's room so that you can keep them separated and not necessarily have to baby proof that older child's room, because It's gonna be nearly impossible to do.

Even when baby no longer needs a mat on the floor, the play mat converts into pyramids, with plenty of «object permanence» peekaboo games to play.

Baby's emotional communication with an adult starts long before he knows how to perform simple actions with the objects.

And if the child already knows the letters, choose one and name the objects that begin with it.

It is known that babies love to interact with every object around them.

When your crawling baby or roving toddler heads toward an unacceptable or dangerous play object, calmly say «No» and either remove your child from the area or distract him or her with an appropriate activity.

«Growing up in the big world is scary for children, and security blankets, known in child development jargon as «transitional objects,» help them transition from the familiar to the unfamiliar with more ease,» pediatrician Dr. Bob Sears said in an interview with Parenting.

For me, I know that my preschooler can confidently recall numbers 1 - 10 and can associate the number name with an amount of objects.

• They may also now be able to put objects into a container and understand and respond to simple instructions as well as let you know what they want with gestures.

To keep him from getting frustrated, start out with a few objects — a cat, a cookie — you're sure he knows.