Sentences with phrase «with observational facts»

The signature of CO2 warming, the tropical tropospheric hot spot at 8 km is not observed which is consistent with the observational fact that there has been almost no tropical region warming.

Not exact matches

All observational facts are theory - dependent, it is said; they therefore do not provide an independent criterion with which to adjudicate between theories.

If you read the part you quoted in context, you will see that it is a call for more studies in light of the fact that «Increasingly better observational studies suggest that planned hospital birth is not any safer than planned home birth assisted by an experienced midwife with collaborative medical back up, but may lead to more interventions and more complications.»

u «A great array of observational facts must be explained by a satisfactory theory [on the evolution of the solar system], and the theory must be consistent with the principles of dynamics and modern physics.

In fact, one observational system of which I am aware (i.e., the TAP System for Teacher and Student Advancement) is marketing its proprietary system, using as a primary selling point figures illustrating (with text explaining) how clients who use their system will improve their prior «Widget Effect» results (i.e., yielding such normal curves; see Figure below, as per Jerald & Van Hook, 2011, p. 1).

In fact our real argument turned around is that we reject a model amplification of 1.2 and even 1.0 over land since that is inconsistent with the observational analysis of observed ratios of surface and lower troposphere trends.

In fact, NO ONE HAS YET FOUND A WAY WITH OBSERVATIONAL DATA TO TEST CLIMATE MODEL SENSITIVITY.

that CO2 plays a very small to insignificant role in climate change (when we consider observational facts and physical laws instead of models that do not even agree with measured facts).

As someone who follows climate change news fairly closely, something that's been simultaneously frustrating and scary is how many people seem to believe that scientists are exaggerating the effects of climate change as a scare tactic, when in fact, if you compare their predictions with the actual observational evidence, scientists have overwhelmingly UNDERestimated the speed and violence of climate impacts.

Even Richard Lindzen agrees that tropical tropospheric amplification follows from basic physics and has nothing to do with the greenhouse effect mechanism... and that the fact that is a problem with the observational data, not the models (and, at any rate, nothing to do with the mechanism causing the warming).