Not exact matches
The difficulty of those questions stems most of the time from being unable to reconcile the
obvious nonsense of religion
with reality.
It's
obvious that anyone that doesn't agree
with your perverse and hate filled perspective is automatically plastered
with your turn about
nonsense.
Every year we seem to need 4 or 5 top quality players and at most end up
with 2 - remember the summer we only signed Cech despite needing a CB, CDM and ST.. It is still glaringly
obvious that we need a top quality CB (VVD / Manolas / De Vrij / Tah / Sakho / Koulibaly), a no
nonsense CDM (N'zonzi / Danilo Pereira / Carvalho / Diawara / Krychowiak) and a creative central midfielder (Seri / Kovacic / Banega / Pastore / Trigueros).
Not that it doesn't have fun
with the
obvious archetypes — Josh Brolin was basically born to play the kind of gruff, no -
nonsense commanding officer who stands on ridges talking to the wildfires as he tries to predict where they're headed next.
The next stages are easy to predict as well — the issues of «process» will be lost in the noise, the fake overreaction will dominate the wider conversation and become an alternative fact to be regurgitated in twitter threads and blog comments for years, the originators of the issue may or may not walk back the many mis - statements they and others made but will lose credibility in any case, mainstream scientists will just see it as hyper - partisan noise and ignore it, no papers will be redacted, no science will change, and the actual point (one presumes) of the «process» complaint (to encourage better archiving practices) gets set back because it's associated
with such
obvious nonsense.
Something has changed
with DC's and John Mashey's investigation: we scientists used to think of denialism as a science problem, something that could be set right
with more science; the WR was
obvious nonsense and not even peer reviewed, so the scientific response was to so argue this and ignore the report.